Better feat

Wait so you're now saying it had stellar mass but no gravitational forces acting on it?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
And that proves what exactly? Just because he has a CORE does NOT automatically mean he has the same mass as a stellar star. Again go back to the nuclear fusion mention. Those have cores too. BUT hur DuR NoPe Cuz nOT sTaTeD!

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Thats Cuz you understand science, or anything. at all.

The star the was in the spear underwent supernova. Do you think a star that underwent supernova would have the same if not a gravitational pull at all? Doesn’t dispute THE fact that it had mass on a stellar proportion when it was plucked out of the dimension.

You didn’t even know the difference between fusion and fission and now you proven you don’t understand what happens after a star goes supernova.

You’re argument here flies against astronomy. Google it and then compare the results with your post and tell me why you’re an idiot for posting this. Your post doesn’t even make a pick of sense. Like WTH is “... Do you think a star that underwent supernova would have the same if not a gravitational pull at all?”....

Are you saying that a star loses gravitational pull after going supernova? Get your caregiver to hold you together man, you’re all over the place.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Wait so you're now saying it had stellar mass but no gravitational forces acting on it?

We know a star large enough to go supernova can collapse into a blackhole and have blackhole level gravitational pull or a neutron star at least. Yeah

Or.... if a star goes supernova, it has no mass. A supernova is an explosion.

You understand how a star can be seen at night. It’s the same power as Nightcrawlers teleportation. Thus it can happen.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Or.... if a star goes supernova, it has no mass. A supernova is an explosion.

I pointed that out to JBL who hasn't been seen since.

And after I said it, Albert changed his position and changed it to red suns, not supernova lol.

Look at it like a diagram. A goes with b when a is an aspect of c. Thus continuum is maintained.

Did jbl post pics of his boat?

Originally posted by Diesldude
Of course I understand Science you colossal moron. You’re the one that is getting confused by all the google searches you’re doing.

You didn’t even know the difference between fusion and fission and now you proven you don’t understand what happens after a star goes supernova.

You’re argument here flies against astronomy. Google it and then compare the results with your post and tell me why you’re an idiot for posting this. Your post doesn’t even make a pick of sense. Like WTH is “... Do you think a star that underwent supernova would have the same if not a gravitational pull at all?”....

Are you saying that a star loses gravitational pull after going supernova? Get your caregiver to hold you together man, you’re all over the place.

😂 COMPLETE dumbass, I don't even know what you're on about at this point.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lmao.

So we are straight up ignoring the RL ramifications of stellar mass within the Earth's atmosphere suddenly appearing?

But screaming about RLmanmade fusion reactors (which aren't really feasible apart for a few seconds)?

Cool.

Did he cause a gravitational anomaly due to his mass?

Was there a specific mention to mass being abnormal for a man sized being?

Was it stated on panel that he had the mass of a star? Was there a statement or a demonstration of him having abnormal mass for a person sized object? Was there a feat of gravitational anomaly taking place around him?

Did he cause a gravitational anomaly due to his mass?

Go ahead and answer these questions, I want a COHERENT answer for it too. It better make sense

We don't SEE see ANYTHING there that indicates his mass is something abnormal or noteworthy

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So in your perspective. A star somehow doesnt have a stellar mass? The comic didnt state he is a nuclear reactor, So keep your headcanon for yourself

Yeah no it's the same thing, it stands. How you feel about is irrelevant

This is like the 5th time i've had to dismantle the superman bridage on another "feat" they desperately want the masses to believe 😂 same old same old

Like I said you see the sun rise and set every day.

So too True believers did Thanos know it.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 COMPLETE dumbass, I don't even know what you're on about at this point.

You don’t believe me? 100% you don’t know what this crap is.

“Do you think a star that underwent supernova would have the same if not a gravitational pull at all? Doesn’t dispute THE fact that it had mass on a stellar proportion when it was plucked out of the dimension.”

You know when it gets to be 90 degrees. Every angle is at 90degrees
So if a star follows that rule then it could happen.
It could be on top of Hulk and not destroy the world. I hope that clears it up.

Originally posted by Wonder Man
You know when it gets to be 90 degrees. Every angle is at 90degrees
So if a star follows that rule then it could happen.
It could be on top of Hulk and not destroy the world. I hope that clears it up.

ww.youtube.com/watch?v=mZsaaturR6E

Fusion on Earth is not achieved the same way as fusion in a star, hence you don't need to build massive star-sized devices to replicate it.

First of all, experimental fusion reactors use Deuterium or Tritium for the fusion proces, which is MUCH easier to fuse than normal hydrogen.

Second, stars need to be massive for the fusion process to occur because otherwise their cores aren't hot enough (at 15M kelvin). THey need to exert additional pressure via gravity to make it work.

On the other hand, temperatures of 150M kelvin can be reached on Earth, hence there is no need for the gravity element. That's why experimental fusion reactors don't need huge mass because the temperatures and containment techniques are the substitute for the pressure exerted by a star's gravity.

To sum up, POTUS in DC could scorch a country with a nuke. Superman could do the same with HV. The effects are the same but the methods are different. So we can't say POTUS = Superman just because they're causing the same effect.

In the case of Last Son it was said he's a living star (not a reactor) and it was said he was fusing hydrogen (not Deuterium or Tritium) so the comparions with fusion reactors are not accurate.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Here is a miniature sun.

In the article it even says the scientists weren't able to replicate the fusion process. So that's kinda moot

Even if they could, they would have done it in a different way than a star does.

Stars use brute force to fuse hydrogen that's why they need to be massive.

Humans use different mechanisms to achieve the same effect.

The initial argument was that a certain amount of mass is required before fusion can occur IN A STAR.

Comparing that to REACTORS is inaccurate because the methods of fusion IN REACTORS don't require high gravitational pressure (hence reactors don't need high mass)

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil

Yeah no it's the same thing, it stands. How you feel about is irrelevant

This is like the 5th time i've had to dismantle the superman bridage on another "feat" they desperately want the masses to believe 😂 same old same old