Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Because the comic said he is a star not a nuclear reactor 😂?
The only thing that gets dismantled is your face. Remember you claimed that anti-life amped Superman, But it turns out it actually weakening and even killing him? 😆
😂 and That means nothing, DC has stars which weigh 100 tons. Superman considers them to be heavy.
Originally posted by Diesldude
hey moron you admitted that I know science and I said of course I am. Then had you going in circles about supernova.You don’t believe me? 100% you don’t know what this crap is.
“Do you think a star that underwent supernova would have the same if not a gravitational pull at all? Doesn’t dispute THE fact that it had mass on a stellar proportion when it was plucked out of the dimension.”
When you're still waiting for an idiot to explain his point 🤦
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 COMPLETE dumbass, I don't even know what you're on about at this point.Did he cause a gravitational anomaly due to his mass?
Was there a specific mention to mass being abnormal for a man sized being?
Was it stated on panel that he had the mass of a star? Was there a statement or a demonstration of him having abnormal mass for a person sized object? Was there a feat of gravitational anomaly taking place around him?
Did he cause a gravitational anomaly due to his mass?
Go ahead and answer these questions, I want a COHERENT answer for it too. It better make sense
We don't SEE see ANYTHING there that indicates his mass is something abnormal or noteworthy
Yeah no it's the same thing, it stands. How you feel about is irrelevant
This is like the 5th time i've had to dismantle the superman bridage on another "feat" they desperately want the masses to believe 😂 same old same old
So we didn't see any gravitational anomalies with Proxima Midnight's spear.
Cool.
So it's debunked. Thanks.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil😂 The moving goal post is hilarious.
😂 and That means nothing, DC has stars which weigh 100 tons. Superman considers them to be heavy.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
😂 The moving goal post is hilarious.
First you brought a point complete irrelevant to my posts, Tried to prove Last Son wasnt a star. And you claimed he is a star now?
Also I gave you the benefit of the doubt, Lets assume what you said is true(Even though you didnt provide scans or source). The comic never stated Last Son weighs 100 tons. Only stated he is a star. There are no extra descriptive words to add
So my point stands still. Last Son is a star so he has stellar mass due to linguistic definition.
WELL It's from Adventures of Superman 618, I woulda ASSUMED you'd knew about it considering how much you deep throat Superman 😂 So yeah no unless the living star weight/mass was explictly stated, there's zero "stellar" mass from him.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
WELL It's from Adventures of Superman 618, I woulda ASSUMED you'd knew about it considering how much you deep throat Superman 😂 So yeah no unless the living star weight/mass was explictly stated, there's zero "stellar" mass from him.
And how much does Kuan Yin Xorn 's head weigh 😂
Such double standards.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilLol. Fisrt of all, I never claimed Ive photographic memory. And you used a comic that 1. Wasnt written by the same writer and 2. It was from a comic that nearly a decade ago.
WELL It's from Adventures of Superman 618, I woulda ASSUMED you'd knew about it considering how much you deep throat Superman 😂 So yeah no unless the living star weight/mass was explictly stated, there's zero "stellar" mass from him.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Also I gave you the benefit of the doubt, Lets assume what you said is true(Even though you didnt provide scans or source). The comic never stated Last Son weighs 100 tons. Only stated he is a star. There are no extra descriptive words to add
So my point stands still. Last Son is a star so he has stellar mass due to linguistic definition.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Lol. Fisrt of all, I never claimed Ive photographic memory. And you used a comic that 1. Wasnt written by the same writer and 2. It was from a comic that nearly a decade ago.
So, Like I said beforeUnless you want arguing Last Son wasnt a star. Wait, You did. But you later contradicting yourself LMAO
It's from Post crisis, and its canon so yeah it would DEF Stand, and Like you always say "ExplicTlY sTaTed In A cOmic dUr!" NOW YOU wanna ignore it because it doesn't suit you? That's ****ing hilarious 😂
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
It's from Post crisis, and its canon so yeah it would DEF Stand, and Like you always say "ExplicTlY sTaTed In A cOmic dUr!" NOW YOU wanna ignore it because it doesn't suit you? That's ****ing hilarious 😂
Originally posted by abhilegend
That's a white dwarf star fragment from Atom's belt. Not an actual star.
Unlike Kuan Yin Xorn 😂
So back to my point which Albert is helpfully assisting with.
Comic stars come in all shapes and sizes. To say Hulk struggled under a full sized star when no weight/mass was explicitly mentioned means there was zero stellar mass involved 😂
Also the argument is straight from comicvine.
https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/gen-discussion-1/superman-vs-a-living-star-2122069/
At least Alberto is consistent.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilExcept Last Son wasnt the white dwarf star that you posted.🙂 . I also could post Solaris scans to prove DC has stellar mass stars. But it gets us nowhere. Completely waste of time.
It's from Post crisis, and its canon so yeah it would DEF Stand, and Like you always say "ExplicTlY sTaTed In A cOmic dUr!" NOW YOU wanna ignore it because it doesn't suit you? That's ****ing hilarious 😂
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Except Last Son wasnt the white dwarf star that you posted.🙂 . I also could post Solaris scans to prove DC has stellar mass stars. But it gets us nowhere. Completely waste of time.
So yeah, You yet again posted another completely irrelevant scan.
That's not the point, its evidence that a star can be small and NOT have stellar mass.
Like what we've been telling you super stans for the past few days. 🤦
Originally posted by abhilegend
Also the argument is straight from comicvine.https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/gen-discussion-1/superman-vs-a-living-star-2122069/
At least Alberto is consistent.
😂 cuz you're mindset/motifian, you both have the exact same arguments for the living sun on here and over there like everybody pointed out on that exact thread, they ran you over here after you got debunked on that thread again
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilAnd like I said before. There are no extra descriptive words to define Last Son was only 100 tons. I also could post solaris scans to prove an opposite conclusion star could be small and have stellar mass in dc comics.
That's not the point, its evidence that a star can be small and NOT have stellar mass.
Like what we've been telling you super stans for the past few days. 🤦
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And like I said before. There are no extra descriptive words to define Last Son was only 100 tons. I also could post solaris scans to prove an opposite conclusion star could be small and have stellar mass in dc comics.
All we know is Last Son is a star and a star generally has stellar mass. So by definition, Last Son has stellar mass since he is a star
But it doesn't. That star weighed 100 tons, that's a canon fact. It didn't state ANY weight for the Last son so why would you assume it had "Stellar" mass when the scan I just posted showed a white dwarf star weighing 100 tons? You're desperate at this point. 😂
You've yet to show any references to anything about the mass of a star in relation to something made from a similar recipe with objectively differing facets.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
But it doesn't. That star weighed 100 tons, that's a canon fact. It didn't state ANY weight for the Last son so why would you assume it had "Stellar" mass when the scan I just posted showed a white dwarf star weighing 100 tons? You're desperate at this point. 😂You've yet to show any references to anything about the mass of a star in relation to something made from a similar recipe with objectively differing facets.
So when PM says:
It could easily be 100 tons holding Hulk down? Lmao. Albert, I am absolutely spanking you at this point.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Like Proxima's spear.Cool.
Except Proxima states her spear was made from a life giving star (and you know the rest) while Corvus stated the weight of a star. Now at minimum that's the weight of the sun (since there are stars that have weights at 1.4M and higher), but that would just make it a range and confusing.
Atom here states the white dwarf star he has weighs 100 tons.
None of this is up for dispute
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Except Proxima states her spear was made from a life giving star (and you know the rest) while Corvus stated the weight of a star. Now at minimum that's the weight of the sun (since there are stars that have weights at 1.4M and higher), but that would just make it a range and confusing.Atom here states the white dwarf star he has weighs 100 tons.
None of this is up for dispute
But its showing your bias.
RL stars =/= Comic stars - you yourself have proven this. If I go on wiki, I too can show that in RL, white dwarves are as heavy as our Sun. But as you show, comic stars ignore this RL physics.
So as you said, without an explicit weight/mass given, you can't assume it is stellar mass.