The answer is yes, you are being blind to arguments. And like I've repeatedly said you've been willfully ignorant to said arguments. As has been noted Blade has been depicted with boy-thing the majority of his arca for the last 2 years. When he's not depicted with it, it has been syayed or shown why with the exception of the Khonshu arc. You brought back King in Black point, so now you're lying once again to try and get a favorable moderator ruling when they clearly are not interested in this.
To anyone that cares the point is simply Blade has been shown with boy-thing more consistently than any of his other equipment over the last 2 years save his swords. For characters with variable equipment, we use their most consistent showings. DS purely for the sake of protecting his ego I guess has shifted it to standard use and is showing arcs in which its shown why Blade isn't using boy-thing for combat but is shown using him for other things (e.g. War of Realms, doesn't use him to fight, is shown using him to travel between missions) or is attempting an absence of evidence argument (e.g. Blade hasn't been shown with BT in King in Black therefore he doesn't have him inexplicably, even though the event is on-goijg and we have advertisements for the event in the future showing that Blade uses BT).
Its been fairly clear for everyone else who has read through the arguments that BT is standard for Blade, and as multiple users began making that point DS panics and make this thread.
Its been 2 years since Blade got BT, and has made use of him in every major arc, save for the Khonshu arc and the current arc so far where he decides that BT should look after a baby while he guards the outside of the base, with clear evidence he will be using him in the next major arc. If 2 years of consistent possession isn't standard for a character with varied arsenal, then to the point there's no reason to assume batman has everything in his belt. Especially since we've seen Blade can have BT do other things. The only counter argument is the exact absence of evidence argument that DS is arguing is insufficient for the belt.
Like I said in BOTH threads though. Its been fairly clear to everyone else involved and I'd be happy to engage in the other threads with people who are interested in having honest debates about it. Not people who continue to make dishonest arguments and lie. This isn't that serious and makes the whole thing worse for everyone involved.