Being critical of Immigration does not make you racist.

Started by eThneoLgrRnae7 pages

Washington Post lol.

This comes back to what I said earlier about where you get your "news".

Washington Compost is more like it lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Washington Post lol.

This comes back to what I said earlier about where you get your "news".

Washington Compost is more like it lol.

They left an sig across their entire site that smeared Trump as xenophobic racist homophobic yadda yadda yadda

Totally not a biased news source.

Originally posted by cdtm
They left an sig across their entire site that smeared Trump as xenophobic racist homophobic yadda yadda yadda

Totally not a biased news source.

Yeah, totally. 🙄

Originally posted by Newjak
Oh definitely.

I just wanted point out that comparing the struggles of the Irish and Italian immigration events to the more ethnically diverse immigration we see today or the slave trade there is that one major difference.

That being that the Irish and Italians could more easily blend into the white culture within a generation or two. That wasn't and isn't the case for other types of immigrants where race can still cause problems generations later.

I don't think their integration was as quick as that. Maybe 3-4 is a better number.

Originally posted by cdtm
Weren't the elites protestant?

W.A.S.P.'s.

Any Irish elites were either still catholic, or had become pawns of the Brits.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Washington Post lol.

This comes back to what I said earlier about where you get your "news".

Washington Compost is more like it lol.

Yeah they must've deep faked those quotes in those videos eh? Because dear leader totally never said those things he's on video saying. Because that would mean he either doesn't have an "amazing" memory or he lied. And dear leader is an infallible source of pure truth.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't think their integration was as quick as that. Maybe 3-4 is a better number.

Any Irish elites were either still catholic, or had become pawns of the Brits.

That's fair I wouldn't argue if you want to say it was closer to that.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't think their integration was as quick as that. Maybe 3-4 is a better number.

Any Irish elites were either still catholic, or had become pawns of the Brits.

So wasp's were British?

Originally posted by Newjak
That's fair I wouldn't argue if you want to say it was closer to that.

I suppose it's a close enough gap that it doesn't really matter either way.

Originally posted by cdtm
So wasp's were British?

Yes. Though the catholicism of the time might be (and probably was) very different at the time, the vast majority of Irish people were catholic back then. When the British were in power they did try to make Protestantism (?) the dominant religion in Ireland (you literally had to convert to get food etc, and catholicism practice was technically illegal), but it never really took hold.

It's a fair assumption that if an Irish person that landed in America had a religion, that it was catholicism.

Originally posted by cdtm
So wasp's were British?
it stands for white Anglo Saxon Protestant. The English flag is white, it was founded by Anglo saxons, and it invented the Protestant religion. Shit, the King James Version is named after James the first and wizards come from English folklore.

I’m wasting my time.