Destroyer vs Imperiex Probe

Started by StiltmanFTW5 pages
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
TBH, I dont want to think

None of us wants that.

Thinking can lead to asking existential questions and such deep brooding never ends well.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
TBH, I dont want to think/make this too complicated.

I personally view EA is to normal probes what Superman/Supergirl/Zod/*Insert any non-generic kryptonian is to generic kryptonians/Daxamites. Even though sometimes they were stated to be as powerful as other kryptonians, But their feats suggest oterhwise

And Like I said before, EA's feats seem to be more impressive. But this just my two cents

And I understand your argument, but it doesn't work for a couple reasons. One is your analogy is flawed, as at least for Clark and Kara there are reasons to but them above, where the Probes were mass produced, not varied genetic potential like with a living race. Two is I'm not arguing the EA feats in general, just tanking the OE, because what Darkseid said supports the Probes are just that durable.

Originally posted by Delta1938
The argument this started from was the Entropy Aegis tanking the Omega Effect. Arguments about the Apokolipsian tech were made. But Darkseid's description was all it was turning Imperiex's own power against him.

Then after it takes the OE, after Superman leaves, Darkseid says the "Imperiex drone's shell repelled even my Omega Effect" He says nothing of Apokolipsian technology being part of it.

https://bit.ly/3ibIveS

If the EA tanked them because of the Probe's shell, wouldn't that be a feat of the shell, so the Probes?

The other stuff I posted was just to argue actually there are examples that the Probes may have done some of the things being used to argue against the EA taking the OE because of the Probe's durability.

Okay?

Originally posted by Delta1938
And I understand your argument, but it doesn't work for a couple reasons. One is your analogy is flawed, as at least for Clark and Kara there are reasons to but them above, where the Probes were mass produced, not varied genetic potential like with a living race. Two is I'm not arguing the EA feats in general, just tanking the OE, because what Darkseid said supports the Probes are just that durable.

Well, Then I think this will go back to whether you want to use specific evidence or implicated powers
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Regardless. Like I said before either EA no sold Omega Beams is a high showing for probes and Tanks example just a low showing for probes. We'll ignore low showings per forum rules

Or we can make arguments that based on some implications, Like the tank was amped and EA wasnt just a normal probe etc


I personally think this problem should be relatively simple or maybe I just dont want to think too hard*shrug*

Originally posted by -Pr-
Okay?

Go home Pr, you're drunk.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Well, Then I think

I personally think

You are thinking too much.

Don't let the existential crisis consume you.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

You are thinking too much.

Don't let the existential crisis consume you.


Im still learning the power that resides in Carver 🙁
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Is it possible to learn the power that lies in Carver,Alberto,JBL,Quan?

Im so bored, I want to be perfectly intoxicated

Nobody can truly master that knowledge, my young Padawan.

And it is way too dangerous to even attempt so.

Now, if you value your life, you must...

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Well, Then I think this will go back to whether you want to use specific evidence or implicated powers

I personally think this problem should be relatively simple or maybe I just dont want to think too hard*shrug*

I mean by definition it would be a high tanking the Omega Effect, but not an outlier. Outside Superman(who had 3 energy examples I can recall, one when all out), I believe they were only damaged(energy wise) by that amped Black Lightning. And think about it. He was amped but it's been used against the Probes like we know how powerful it was. But by definition it would be the outlier.

As mentioned they took energy attacks from an amped GL, one was no selling Doctor Light II and Geo-Force plus someone I didn't recognize simultaneously. What little was shown of Mordru/Legion team. Booster Gold plus Blue Beetle's vehicle blasted one to no avail. There are other examples, mostly not worth mentioning outside they weren't damaged by energy blasts, so taking away Superman, we have one example I'm aware of.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Go home Pr, you're drunk.

I genuinely just didn't know what you were getting at was all.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I genuinely just didn't know what you were getting at was all.

The only actual feat(unless I missed something) for the Entropy Aegis being argued was it tanking the Omega Effect, and Darkseid's statement supports it was the Probes are just that durable, not it was the Apokolips tech. But it got dragged out.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I genuinely just didn't know what you were getting at was all.

I think Delta point is the specific showing( I.E Entropy Aegis no selling Darkseid's omega beams) is a legitimate feat to probes, Which I can understand since Darkseid specifically attributed it to probes' durability

Edit: Delta ninja'ed me

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Edit: Delta ninja'ed me

https://youtu.be/BAqabMWnAmk

(you'll pretty much have to watch the whole clip to get it, also NSFW language, and comedic gore)

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
I think

Again?????

Stop!!!!

Massive action >>>> careful planning

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Again?????

Stop!!!!

Massive action >>>> careful planning


I initially wanted to edit it but Im too lazy to do so 😮

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
I initially wanted to edit it but Im too lazy to do so 😮

Editing it further would require more thinking Stilt is getting on you about. You did the right thing.