Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Brought to you by the guy who just posted...
And yet you kept addressing me, so unless I put you on ignore I'll probably respond.
Also i get that you have no rebuttal so just have to troll at this point.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Want me to give you a perfect example of why Sunak would utterly fail, contrary to what you think? And more so than if they even put Johnson forward again?Because that encapsulates your typical little englander Tory voter.
Yeah I don't think you get that the electorate is different to Tory members. Rishi gets elected, markets will start to recover on the news, and Tory's poll numbers will start to recover.
But I like how you've quickly changed argument basically conceding your original rebuttal was retarded:
"Oh Rishi said something immoral once, so clearly he can't help them"
Originally posted by Darth Thor
And yet you kept addressing me, so unless I put you on ignore I'll probably respond.Also i get that you have no rebuttal so just have to troll at this point.
Yeah I don't think you get that the electorate is different to Tory members. Rishi gets elected, markets will start to recover on the news, and Tory's poll numbers will start to recover.
But I like how you've quickly changed argument basically conceding your original rebuttal was retarded:
"Oh Rishi said something immoral once, so clearly he can't help them"
You really are utterly dense. I haven't "quickly changed" anything. I've given 2 reasons why he won't make a difference to the Tories polling numbers. There's plenty more. You know. The reasons you were begging for.
But sure, go ahead, put me on ignore, wrong guy. Being wrong sure brings out the chicken shit phaggotry in your eyes.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You really are utterly dense. I haven't "quickly changed" anything. I've given 2 reasons why he won't make a difference to the Tories polling numbers. There's plenty more. You know. The reasons you were begging for.But sure, go ahead, put me on ignore, wrong guy. Being wrong sure brings out the chicken shit phaggotry in your eyes.
You absolutely attempted to move away from your first retarded point. But let me get this straight. Your 2 reasons now on why Sunak can't improve Tory's polling numbers are:
1) He said something stupid once
2) He's brown
Think it's pretty clear whose dense here (and seriously triggered).
I gave a point.
You cried about wanting more points
I gave another point
You cried that I was moving away from my 1st point
Now you're crying again about wanting more points.
Will you cry about me moving away from those 2 points if I give another point?
Probably!
How about the fact that Johnson supporters are now saying they will continuously rebel against Sunak until he calls a General Election? Meaning he won't get anything through Parliament and all these miracle policies you somehow think will restore the polling of the Tories won't even happen?
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I gave a point.
You cried about wanting more points
I gave another point
You cried that I was moving away from my 1st point
Now you're crying again about wanting more points.
Will you cry about me moving away from those 2 points if I give another point?
Probably!How about the fact that Johnson supporters are now saying they will continuously rebel against Sunak until he calls a General Election? Meaning he won't get anything through Parliament and all these miracle policies you somehow think will restore the polling of the Tories won't even happen?
The only one crying here is you, for me making a completely valid point. You were simply triggered by the suggestion of Tories poll numbers improving.
Then you cried you didn't want to explain how retarded your initial rebuttal was.
Then you claimed he won't be able to improve numbers because he's brown, posting a racist Tory member's comments (Fun fact: 40% of members votes still went to him in the last leadership race, and 25% of the ones that went to Truss admit now they made the wrong choice).
Now you're going on about him not having enough support from MP's, despite him perhaps getting the support of 200 by the end of today. So who exactly does? The names you threw out had ZERO supporters from MP's.
If Tory's don't want to back their next leader, then that's their choice to commit suicide, just like it was their choice to put Liz Truss forward, and then turn on her when the DUH moment came about how terrible she was.
But fact remains, Sunak is their only chance for mere SURVIVAL. Because fact is then you're looking at a Sunak vs Starmer. And Sunak already has some credentials with the GE for his helping out during Covid with Furlough e.t.c., and calling out the Truss's plan as disastrous before being implemented. Whereas Starmer has ZERO credentials and refused to criticise Truss's plans in advance (captain hindsight). Now Starmer will of course still win, but Sunak is by far the best hope to start to close the gap.
But I get it's easier for you to rage than just admit you were triggered by the reality of Sunak being their best option.
Originally posted by Macklemore
*who'sThat is the short version of "who is" whereas 'whose' is a possessive pronoun and not correct in your context.
😛
I understood the mistake with your first word. You didn't have to explain 😂
But my grammar and accuracy of words is generally terrible when posting from my phone.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
The only one crying here is you, for me making a completely valid point. You were simply triggered by the suggestion of Tories poll numbers improving.Then you cried you didn't want to explain how retarded your initial rebuttal was.
Then you claimed he won't be able to improve numbers because he's brown, posting a racist Tory member's comments (Fun fact: 40% of members votes still went to him in the last leadership race, and 25% of the ones that went to Truss admit now they made the wrong choice).
Now you're going on about him not having enough support from MP's, despite him perhaps getting the support of 200 by the end of today. So who exactly does? The names you threw out had ZERO supporters from MP's.
If Tory's don't want to back their next leader, then that's their choice to commit suicide, just like it was their choice to put Liz Truss forward, and then turn on her when the DUH moment came about how terrible she was.
But fact remains, Sunak is their only chance for mere SURVIVAL. Because fact is then you're looking at a Sunak vs Starmer. And Sunak already has some credentials with the GE for his helping out during Covid with Furlough e.t.c., and calling out the Truss's plan as disastrous before being implemented. Whereas Starmer has ZERO credentials and refused to criticise Truss's plans in advance (captain hindsight). Now Starmer will of course still win, but Sunak is by far the best hope to start to close the gap.
But I get it's easier for you to rage than just admit you were triggered by the reality of Sunak being their best option.
There's those goalposts mysteriously moving again, wrong guy.