Abortion

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
Abortion is a practice based off of selfish intents and is a ursurption of life. If medical science hadn't figured out how to do it no one would have the choice of it would they now? It would have been better left that way.

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
Then take those things and leave the rest of the world alone. Clearly there are many people who do not have the wisdom to see the truth outright.

What truth? You choose to believe in God, I'm not telling you that you're wrong, because I don't know for an absolute fact that he exists, neither do you, you just have faith. I've accepted that, why can't you accept that christians are not the only people in this world? What athiests and agnostics do has nothing to do with you unless it causes you direct harm, which abortion does not, regardless of any "Yes it does" type remark you may have.

Religion has no place here.

-AC

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
Then take those things and leave the rest of the world alone.

Sage advice for someone who thinks they speak for everyone. Including your own god.

Very clever, but I was directing that to you. So follow advice because you dont seem to be reasonable enough to even listen to the arguments people have given in the past.

I'm listening to your argument. You are suggesting that we should live by and adhere to something that you have chosen to believe, whether we believe the same or not.

That is complete bs.

-AC

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
Very clever, but I was directing that to you. So follow advice because you dont seem to be reasonable enough to even listen to the arguments people have given in the past.

You know, there's a quote button for a reason. Quote the people you are talking to, and there will be less confusion.

It is a system we should adopt... To keep those in line that do not know what is good for themselves or the others they affect.

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
It is a system we should adopt... To keep those in line that do not know what is good for themselves or the others they affect.

Firstly, we? You speak for you and you alone. You do not speak for me, as I do not speak for you. I don't consider myself to have any right to tell you what to and what NOT to believe in. Why do you consider yourself any different? You don't know what's good for me or anyone else besides yourself (although I would doubt that).

Abortion doesn't affect you, at all. You may have a moral problem with it, but you as a christian, probably have a moral problem with a lot of things such as certain music, movies and TV shows. You don't go banning them though, why? Because they have no bearing on you or your life. Don't like the music? Think it's immoral? Don't listen. Don't like the movie? Don't watch. Don't like abortion? F*ck off and leave the female alone.

So unless you are a christian who is pro-banning everything that is immoral to him, to be anti-abortion because of that same reason, is extremely hypocritical and renders anything you have to say, irrelevant.

-AC

Originally posted by soleran30
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_vs_wade

Do yourself a favor and read that. Thats not the whole constitution which by the way has nothing in it that says a women has the right to an abortion which gets all tied up in a cadre of other laws that just get jumbled.

So read that then give me the facts here on why we do not have the right to ban abortions, fair enough? I just gave you a HUGE hand there.

It does not even appear like you disagree with me or the "right to privacy". What are you so aggravated about?

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
It is a system we should adopt... To keep those in line that do not know what is good for themselves or the others they affect.

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
a practice based off of selfish intents and is a ursurption of life.

"F*ck off and leave the female alone."

Precisely.

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
"F*ck off and leave the female alone."

Precisely.

Female, not foetus. Leave the female alone to make her own choices.

They're not the same word because they begin with F. If you're going to rip off my use-their-quotes-against-them technique, get it right.

-AC

You did the same thing. its only fair I return the favor.

I didn't if you look closely. I proved that you contradict yourself all the time because you're a completely selfish, obnoxious christian.

You quoted me and misinterpreted what I meant.

Obviously didn't have the daily recommendation of Smart Flakes this morning.

-AC

Originally posted by StyleTime
The same things I have been saying are congruent with Roe v Wade. I do not need a wikipedia link to know that. The courts called it "right to privacy". I called it "it has shit to do with me or anyone else."

It does not even appear like you disagree with me or the "right to privacy". What are you so aggravated about?

I'm not aggravated at all as a matter of fact my belief is congruent with roe vs wade and not because its the law its because of my science back ground.

Your belief is beyond the extent of Roe vs Wade. Even the govt states the restrictions of 3rd trimester abortions and why it is that way.

Ultimately though I feel people that just blather on about taking away pro-choice as in the state of South Dakota are rather challenged individuals.

"You quoted me and misinterpreted what I meant."

AS DID YOU....

No, I knew what you meant. I merely took it and applied it to your rationale. You evidently didn't know what I mean because you got it wrong.

Next, the alphabet.

-AC

I exploited some words and used them against you, true.

I'd just like to say I haven't misunderstood either of you.

...Well thats good to know... at least we're on the same page.

Let's try this again.

I used your quote and your idea of taking selfish beliefs away from the world because some people are too blind to see the truth, and applied it to your own selfish beliefs that- in turn- blind you from seeing the truth that not everyone believes in God, is a christian, and also that you have no rights over anyone else at all.

You posted a quote of mine and agreed with it in a failing attempt to put across your own point. Despite misinterpreting my quote in doing so. To agree with it is to suggest we make the same point, we don't, so it was a flawed remark.

New to this?

-AC