Saitama runs the marvel hardcore gauntlet

Started by StiltmanFTW43 pages

Originally posted by Astner

astner is trying to flirt with you by offering a threesome with his wife

Makes sense now 👆

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Makes sense now 👆

h1 is said wife

😂

Astner once convinced a woman not to jump off a building using only the potential energy formula.

She ended up hanging herself.

Originally posted by h1a8
Significant digits are irrelevant here because nothing here is measured to any known precision.

Everything that's given or measured has some precision. If you refer to a million as "a billion" (without further specification) then simply you're wrong. The only time you could argue that there's no precision avalible is when dealiing lower- or upper bounds.

Originally posted by h1a8
Anyway, why post irrelevant stuff about kinetic energy and falling or rising objects?

It's not irrelevant. It's how you present a solution to make it legible.

I'll try to explain it again, and hopefully you'll understand it this time.

If you have three equaitons: a = bcd, b = e - f and c = h + g, and you want to calculate a, then you don't start by calculating b and c and plugging the values into the equation for a.

What you do is reduce the equation to a = (e-f)(h+g)d, and then in the last step you plug in the values.

This way the deduction is separate from given values, and in case there's a misstep in the deduction it's very easy to pick up on. Also, if one of the given values happen to be wrong, it's very easy to correct by plugging in the new value in the now avalible expression.

And this way you won't have to deal with walls of text riddled with eight digit numbers.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Sou desuka?

Post the scans where this happens.


Where what happens?

The basis for your calculations.

Originally posted by Astner
Everything that's given or measured has some precision. If you refer to a million as "a billion" (without further specification) then simply you're wrong. The only time you could argue that there's no precision avalible is when dealiing lower- or upper bounds.

It's not irrelevant. It's how you present a solution to make it legible.

I'll try to explain it again, and hopefully you'll understand it this time.

If you have three equaitons: a = bcd, b = e - f and c = h + g, and you want to calculate a, then you don't start by calculating b and c and plugging the values into the equation for a.

What you do is reduce the equation to a = (e-f)(h+g)d, and then in the last step you plug in the values.

This way the deduction is separate from given values, and in case there's a misstep in the deduction it's very easy to pick up on. Also, if one of the given values happen to be wrong, it's very easy to correct by plugging in the new value in the now avalible expression.

And this way you won't have to deal with walls of text riddled with eight digit numbers.

Nothing was measured. Absolutely nothing
Duh

The average person wouldnt see 1.4e8 as a big number as compared to 140,000,000
I use artistic license to display the numbers how I want them to be shown. If I was responding to you or someone I feel is well versed at basic math then maybe.

Lastly,I been teaching mathematics for over 15 years. I have a masters in mathematics.
I did many many proofs.
I know everything you are talking about.
Right now I'm doing something different that is paving the way for my PhD.

My goal wasn't to solve for 1 particular thing. I wanted to calculate multiple things and offer them as information. For curiosity sake

The math inclined wasn't my audience.
I wanted those who aren't math inclined to be able to follow without needing to get a pencil and paper.
In other word, my goal was to make it idiot proof.

Lastly I tutored physics 1 and classical mechanics for same amount of time.
I stress to all my students to solve symbolically before plugging in values

Math man vs math man. This is gonna be interesting, only person missing is Mignon.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
The basis for your calculations.

Math and science is the basis
😕

Originally posted by h1a8
Math and science is the basis
😕

But which scene had these events taking place which you based your calculations on? Post them. Post the scenes where Saitama did the feats you speak of. If you're just talking in abstracts, then that's worthless.

I want to see the actual scans where you base your math and science on.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But which scene had these events taking place which you based your calculations on? Post them. Post the scenes where Saitama did the feats you speak of. If you're just talking in abstracts, then that's worthless.

I want to see the actual scans where you base your math and science on.

DS the garou scene was posted already so was the after image scene in the fight on lo.

Originally posted by Classic NES
DS the garou scene was posted already so was the after image scene in the fight on lo.

Well I'm asking h1, but since you answered....

The Io fight never happened, so when did the Garou fight occur?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85

The Io fight never happened, so when did the Garou fight occur?

We're using the best versions of the characters for this match. So, for the sake of the thread it did.

We use current versions

Originally posted by h1a8
Nothing was measured. Absolutely nothing
Duh

The average person wouldnt see 1.4e8 as a big number as compared to 140,000,000
I use artistic license to display the numbers how I want them to be shown. If I was responding to you or someone I feel is well versed at basic math then maybe.

Lastly,I been teaching mathematics for over 15 years. I have a masters in mathematics.
I did many many proofs.
I know everything you are talking about.
Right now I'm doing something different that is paving the way for my PhD.

My goal wasn't to solve for 1 particular thing. I wanted to calculate multiple things and offer them as information. For curiosity sake

The math inclined wasn't my audience.
I wanted those who aren't math inclined to be able to follow without needing to get a pencil and paper.
In other word, my goal was to make it idiot proof.

Lastly I tutored physics 1 and classical mechanics for same amount of time.
I stress to all my students to solve symbolically before plugging in values


Why would your alledged credentials or experience matter? Your presentation was terrible. And you don't have to be "math inclined" to prefer a basic algebraic presentation over a wall of text riddled with numbers...the worst part is that it's not like it's more difficult either.

This is like a cook trying to excuse his bad cooking by claiming that he's a master chef and that he wasn't really putting effort into the dish in the first place.

Honestly, only thing keeping Saitama from achieving that level is lack of a challenge. So, if Sentry pushes him he'll just amp to Serious levels again. Plus Genos recorded everything so he can just copy his techniques eventually.

Originally posted by Classic NES
We're using the best versions of the characters for this match. So, for the sake of the thread it did.

We are? Quote the part of the OP where this is said.

CIS-off does not mean he is suddenly at the same levels.

1. He was copying Garou's moves (not applicable anymore, and no, Genos isn't in this thread to teach him all the moves lmao)
2. He explicitly only reached those power levels thanks to the level of emotion he attained, 'like none he had ever experienced'.

Without all these additional factors (the death of Genos, the promise to Tareo to stop Garou, the new skills to copy etc), Saitama isn't at the same level of power or mindset, and no CIS-off stipulations changes that.

CIS-off and Full Capacity doesn't mean what you think it means. Saitama outright needed a specific set of conditions to cause his emotions to surge to those levels, and if Sentry (as an example) doesn't cause those conditions (killing Genos, for example), Saitama isn't hitting those.

Not to mention, he still doesn't have the skills. Outright said he didn't remember. Doesn't matter what Genos remembers, he's not in this thread, and neither does Saitama have a crash course before the fight to relearn things lol.