Voidtry vs World Breaker Hulk

Started by carver911 pages

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So he only melted heralds when the plot called for it. When Strange, Cho, Cosimo etc were around, nothing happened.

Got ya.

Just to show us how powerful he was in the beginning, kind of in line with Superman, who was amped beyond anything he's ever been at but did little damage to a planet or to humans and metas around him. Just how comics work. Both Hulk and Superman are weak AF.

Originally posted by carver9
Just to show us how powerful he was in the beginning, kind of in line with Superman, who was amped beyond anything he's ever been at but did little damage to a planet or to humans and metas around him. Just how comics work. Both Hulk and Superman are weak AF.

So plot driven, I see. He's powerful because he's done this, he's done this because he's powerful.

Well in a forum fight there's no writer or plot driving that WBH has to melt anyone or anything. So he can't, according to your logic.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So plot driven, I see. He's powerful because he's done this, he's done this because he's powerful.

Well in a forum fight there's no writer or plot driving that WBH has to melt anyone or anything. So he can't, according to your logic.

Right!!! Superman punch against World Forger was weak AF even while amped and Hulk can't melt heralds. I agree.

Well considering all WBH has is collateral damage, then it looks pretty poor for him.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Well considering all WBH has is collateral damage, then it looks pretty poor for him.

Looks pretty poor for Superman and World Forger since Superman at his most powerful ever couldn't melt let alone injure low tier beings with his punch or destroy a planet. Can't get any worse than that.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Well considering all WBH has is collateral damage, then it looks pretty poor for him.

Originally posted by carver9
Looks pretty poor for Superman and World Forger since Superman at his most powerful ever couldn't melt let alone injure low tier beings with his punch or destroy a planet. Can't get any worse than that.
collateral damage isn't proof to maximum power. It's proof to minimum power.

For example, collateral damage that lifts a 65 ton tank in the air proves that the actual force applied was between 65 and infinite tons.

Originally posted by carver9
Looks pretty poor for Superman and World Forger since Superman at his most powerful ever couldn't melt let alone injure low tier beings with his punch or destroy a planet. Can't get any worse than that.

Yeah you can.

See amped WBH lol. Normal pickup trucks, human Amadeus and Cosimo.

At least Batman has herald level feats. Remember him and WW? I'm sure you do.

Besides, Superman isn't here, even though you're the guy who keeps using that as an excuse.

Originally posted by carver9

Both Hulk and Superman are weak AF.

True, which is why Sentry wins, like we've established it on page 1.

Originally posted by Enzeru
True, which is why Sentry wins, like we've established it on page 1.

Lol, it's pretty much "But WBH has all these collateral damage feats!"

"What about his lack of collateral damage later on?"

"Oh...collateral damage doesn't count!"

But glad we all now agree that Dark Dimension matter is more fragile.

Why does Sentry win, Saint? What fts?

Originally posted by carver9
Why does Sentry win, Saint? What fts?

BFR 😂

Edit: yes, I waited until it was past editing time for the thread lmao.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
BFR 😂

Edit: yes, I waited until it was past editing time for the thread lmao.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
BFR 😂

Edit: yes, I waited until it was past editing time for the thread lmao.

Show me Void Sentry bfring anyone.

First, what do you define as Void Sentry? Very important, after all.

That's up to the thread starter.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
First, what do you define as Void Sentry? Very important, after all.
At his most powerful and dangerous.

Which one?

Lawrence doesn't know.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Which is kinda my point - there shouldn't be ANY variance.
Aside from artists that rely on computer models for reference like Brandon Peterson, I find it unrealistic to expect that artists can perfectly recreate various perspectives of the same scene from different angles.

That kind of argument appears ignorant of the medium.

And I still don't see what difference in their positions you're seeing.