Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Well yes, I did. Because I knew your hypocritical antics would catch up to you in a spectacular explosion of asininity.
Oh, BTW. I bumped this thread, it's actually you asked for it lol
But by all means, extol us all about multiversal+ Supergirl.
Even though you "rarely concern about these cosmic beings/never pay much attention to them." 😂
Originally posted by ODG
Well yes, I did. Because I knew your hypocritical antics would catch up to you in a spectacular explosion of asininity.But by all means, extol us all about multiversal+ Supergirl.
I mean, aside from a lot of unfriendly comments you made in these two threads. You seemingly contradict yourself is also somehing
For example:
Originally posted by Test123
Recently he got wrecked by the Terrifics so probably some mid tier Marvel team should be able to do it.
Originally posted by ODG
^ I mean... are we supposed to know how powerful Gold Beetle or Omega-Bam-Man are?
Originally posted by ODG
No different than someone trying to troll Anti-Monitor by focusing on him getting his a$$ beat by no-name D-listers Gold Beetle & Wam-Bam-Man:
https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/oo326/OneDumbG0/Anti-Monitor01.jpg
https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/oo326/OneDumbG0/Anti-Monitor02.jpg
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Contradict what? I was trying to give Anti-Monitor the benefit of the doubt back then.
Nah, you misunderstood. It's much funnier seeing your reactions here.I mean, aside from a lot of unfriendly comments you made in these two threads. You seemingly contradict yourself is also somehing
For example:
Then you decided to act like questionable interpretations of current storylines should supercede the actual storyline of the actual character we're discussing in this thread... COIE Anti-Monitor. So I threw an even more recent storyline back at you to defuse such a witless tactic to focus you back towards the on-topic storyline... COIE Anti-Monitor.
Now you don't like that I did that. Whose fault was it in the first place?
I understand that when hypocrites like you keep twisting themselves around, they lose track of all conversation. Because good-faith discussion isn't what you're relying on anymore. No, it's b1tchmade prevarication.
You're better served focusing on my nastiness than acting like you have a leg to stand on. 👆
Originally posted by ODG
Contradict what? I was trying to give Anti-Monitor the benefit of the doubt back then.Then you decided to act like questionable interpretations of current storylines should supercede the actual storyline of the actual character we're discussing in this thread... COIE Anti-Monitor. So I threw an even more recent storyline back at you to defuse such a witless tactic to focus you back towards the on-topic storyline... COIE Anti-Monitor.
I understand that when hypocrites like you keep twisting themselves around, they lose track of all conversation. Because good-faith discussion isn't what you're relying on anymore. No, it's b1tchmade prevarication.
You're better served focusing on my nastiness than acting like you have a leg to stand on. 👆
as for the second paragraph. It also stemmed from your "taking an established history and power station" stance. I.E, in other multiple sources/established history make it clear COIE's Multiverse contains infinite universes(which you argued multiple pages in this thread)
As for the rest of the words. I can just say, have you ever felt that you're a bit delusional/self-projecting and rude?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Was replying to wrong post so big EDIT:
So....as per you, we don't know how powerful these you called "D-list" here. So how does it fit to a low showing, as you can't even tell how powerful they areas for the second paragraph. It also stemmed from your "taking an established history and power station" stance. I.E, in other multiple sources/established history make it clear COIE's Multiverse contains infinite universes(which you argued multiple pages in this thread)
I agree we don't know how strong Gold Beetle and Wam-Bam-Man are. I, myself, pointed that out. At the same time, it was portrayed as utterly humiliating. So, really, let's not rely on the most recent portrayals of characters to reverse-inflate or reverse-deflate characters when we can just look at the actual storyline being discussed. This thread is about COIE Anti-Monitor.
Either way... if you want to keep COIE Anti-Monitor way up to the level of power you're campaigning for, you still have not addressed what that would mean for Supergirl.
Also, I apologize for being an antagonistic schmuck these last few pages over two threads.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Rude? Definitely. Self-projecting? Disagree. I'm not trying to elevate Living Tribunal in the wake of all the developments with his character. I just feel that's what other people are doing with Darkseid or Anti-Monitor. Delusional? Nah. Drunk, yes. But drunk is different from delusional.
As for the rest of the words. I can just say, have you ever felt that you're a bit delusional/self-projecting and rude?
Originally posted by ODG
But by all means, extol us all about multiversal+ Supergirl.
The only incarnation of the Anti-Monitor that can be considered universal is the one that had absorbed the Anti-Matter Universe. The other incarnations were planet - star level, like the heroes he fought.
Originally posted by Astner
The Anti-Monitor was only ever powered by his own universe, and this was when he was at his most powerful.- Crisis on Infinite Earths #10
Originally posted by Astner
Anyone who makes this argument, or even tip-toes around it, is either an idiot or a troll.The only incarnation of the Anti-Monitor that can be considered universal is the one that had absorbed the Anti-Matter Universe. The other incarnations were planet - star level, like the heroes he fought.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Doesn't GL rely on the Central Power Battery? That does not seem super portable.
If he could destroy universes on his own he wouldn't have built the cannon. Interpreting the Anti-Monitor at his normal level as star level is perfectly coherent with the narrative of the story.
Originally posted by Astner
What's with these mental gymnastics? When the Anti-Matter Wave was stopped the Anti-Monitor had an Anti-Matter Canon built to destroy the remaining universes, but the Anti-Matter Cannon was destroyed before it could be used. It's not something he has access to.If he could destroy universes on his own he wouldn't have built the cannon. Interpreting the Anti-Monitor at his normal level as star level is perfectly coherent with the narrative of the story.
Its sole purpose was to breach the void.
Originally posted by Astner
What's with these mental gymnastics? When the Anti-Matter Wave was stopped the Anti-Monitor had an Anti-Matter Canon built to destroy the remaining universes, but the Anti-Matter Cannon was destroyed before it could be used. It's not something he has access to.If he could destroy universes on his own he wouldn't have built the cannon. Interpreting the Anti-Monitor at his normal level as star level is perfectly coherent with the narrative of the story.
he stalemated the monitor backed by the multiverse for a million year
star level my ass， even weakened he survived galaxy wiping attack no problem
Originally posted by AstnerThe Anti-Matter Cannon has more to do with the fact that Monitor moved the remaining universes and their entire timelines to a new dimension he created that Antimonitor couldnt get to and then were fortified against Anti-Matter by Monitors devices that were placed through eras of timespace to halt the Antimatter.
What's with these mental gymnastics? When the Anti-Matter Wave was stopped the Anti-Monitor had an Anti-Matter Canon built to destroy the remaining universes, but the Anti-Matter Cannon was destroyed before it could be used. It's not something he has access to.If he could destroy universes on his own he wouldn't have built the cannon. Interpreting the Anti-Monitor at his normal level as star level is perfectly coherent with the narrative of the story.
