Originally posted by h1a8
So you're moving the goalposts now? You only accept the narration? Yet you've accepted character statements in Marvel multiple times, even when they conflict with what was shown. You've also dismissed the narration in some DC feats. DS posted a few examples of that.
Name the statements I accepted outside of narration. I've asked you this multiple times.
Sure.
H1, would you like me to post Carver's publicly available posts where he blindly accepts Marvel statements? 😂 you can say yes, or no, I'll still probably post them anyway.
While H1 is thinking.....
Hey carv, remember when you said Hulk could juggle suns? What was that based on?
I got loads more lol.
Originally posted by Stoicthat’s not a good argument bro, it was explicitly shown and stated that superman benched the weight of the planet for 5 straight days in the absence of the sun. This feat can’t be argued, there were no hyperboles or ambiguity. They couldn’t be any clearer and all it did was cause Superman to break a single drop of sweat. Unless this feat is retconned or the scientist comes back and says he was just stroking Superman’s ego we have to accept that feat for what it is. Yes or no?
The Destroyer armor, Adamantium, Mjolnir, America’s Shield, even c were at one time or the other said to be indestructible. What happened? Time happened.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Sure.H1, would you like me to post Carver's publicly available posts where he blindly accepts Marvel statements? 😂 you can say yes, or no, I'll still probably post them anyway.
While H1 is thinking.....
Hey carv, remember when you said Hulk could juggle suns? What was that based on?
I got loads more lol.
When did I use "juggle suns" in a debate? I'm sure I mentioned it when you all was using cheese fts.
Originally posted by carver9
When did I use "juggle suns" in a debate? I'm sure I mentioned it when you all was using cheese fts.
Really?
Originally posted by carver9
Hulk nearly overpowered an Abstract entity off of brute strength alone. This same entity presence was ripping reality apart. His PRESENCE and it nearly took every piece of energy he had to hold Hulk and Hulk was getting stronger. Planetary is a non ft. Let's also not forget about him having the weight of a freaking sun on top of him. An all consuming sun. Yep, just like Tony said, Hulk is strong enough to juggle suns. This is NOTHING to him.
One post. Two statements that weren't narration. One was even wrong, lmao (Tony never said he could juggle suns either).
No one was using cheese feats, either, here:
Originally posted by carver9
Hulk just took out Ironman with one hit...an amped Ironman. Can't remember the last time Ironman in standard armor been one shotted and he has fought the most powerful Heralds in comics.Don't think they want to fight a guy that can Juggle suns.
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/19644404/Original_Sin_-_Hulk_vs._Iron_Man_004-002.jpg.html
And:
Originally posted by carver9
😂Juggle suns. Marvel loves Hulk.
Nobody is using cheese feats there either lmao.
I can keep going? I have way more posts from you lol. Or maybe you are tired of using Marvel characters....
Tell me, who is faster, Usain Bolt or Bruce Lee? Bonus question - what DC comic showing is this referring to, and did you accept it at face value?
Now I remember why I accepted that ft. Its not a thought bubble or a bubble related to someone speaking, it's in narrator format which helps its validation. Then it's said by one of the smartest men on the planet. Thats why I said I accept some statements, not all. Depends on the credibility of the character and if its boasting or not.
Oh so now we're moving the goalposts again?? So you now want examples of times Carvy9 accepted statements that involved Marvel characters that were in the form of speech bubbles lmao. And it has to be times that you used them in debates, not when others used 'cheese feats, lol.
How oddly specific. The point being made is that you just accepted things at face value without even questioning it, isn't it funny how you made up a WRONG statement without even reading it properly.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Oh so now we're moving the goalposts again?? So you now want examples of times Carvy9 accepted statements that involved Marvel characters that were in the form of speech bubbles lmao. And it has to be times that you used them in debates, not when others used 'cheese feats, lol.How oddly specific. The point being made is that you just accepted things at face value without even questioning it, isn't it funny how you made up a WRONG statement without even reading it properly.
Not just Marvel. I accepted Batman statements as well. I accepted the statement of Superman being faster than Diana via raw speed. I came to accept Superman bench pressing ft. I accepted Doomsday statement of jumping at the speed of sound to reach metropolis. I accepted Damage statement of being stronger than Superman and punching harder than Doomsday. I also accepted the statement of Flash evacuating the city under the speed of light, and the statement of Cyborg Superman being as fast and strong as Superman.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Tell me what the comic said was done under lightspeed. Exact words, don't add anything.
Ok, word for word.
"As his body sloughs off the screaming after aftereffects of near light travel"
It's literally saying he travel NEAR the speed of light 😂 . Mentioned twice by the way.
We both know what travel means. Is that what you was asking for?
Very good. Both times it mentioned near light speed travel, what was he doing during this time? That's what I was asking.
And tell me how many Koreans were evacuated, the time it took, and how far away they were sent. The comic stated all of this, so we shouldn't ignore any of it, agree? I didn't ask for this scan, BTW, I was asking what he was DOING under lightspeed.
Is that all he was doing?? Travelling? Just running around empty handed in circles lmao.
Originally posted by carver9
It literally states he is fatigued due to running under the speed of light. 🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿
So did you ignore the rest of the text? With the 0.0001microseconds? Yes or no. I mean, its simple, we have to take ALL of the text, not ignore parts which is what you're doing.
We accept all of the narration, which you mysteriously don't when it doesn't suit you. Hypocritical . You go over every single word witha fine tooth comb hoping to fit your conclusion to your theory.
With Tony Stark, you didn't even read the statement properly, but accepted it without question. Hypocritical.
