Originally posted by DarkSaint85
From the running he had just done.
You forgot a crucial piece of that sentence. I'll help you. He's tired due to running shy of the speed of light. It didn't say he's tired from running faster than the speed of light. Running under it fatigued him. Glad that topic is over. What was the other thing you mentioned? Cyborg?
Originally posted by carver9
You forgot a crucial piece of that sentence. I'll help you. He's tired due to running shy of the speed of light. It didn't say he's tired from running faster than the speed of light. Running under it fatigued him. Glad that topic is over. What was the other thing you mentioned? Cyborg?
So you are ignoring the part with the time? This is like my fifth time asking lmao.
Also, where does it say he was tired? See how crucial information gets added by you?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So you are ignoring the part with the time? This is like my fifth time asking lmao.Also, where does it say he was tired? See how crucial information gets added by you?
However you want to read that instance as fatigued, in pain. What we know is, he's experiencing something not comfortable during that instance. I don't know why you're asking me about time when the comic literally tells us he was going shy the speed of light. The comic is literally telling us how fast he went.
Originally posted by carver9
However you want to read that instance as fatigued, in pain. What we know is, he's experiencing something not comfortable during that instance. I don't know why you're asking me about time when the comic literally tells us he was going shy the speed of light. The comic is literally telling us how fast he went.
Lmao so you made shit up again. Anyway,, yes, he's feeling the effects of sublight speed, sure.
The comic also gave a duration and a distance. And it explicitly tells us he made more than one trip.
So him feeling the effects of his last trip doesn't mean he didn't do anything else at under light speed. You are ignoring most of the statement, and focusing on parts of it. This cannot be denied.
Me feeling the effects of my 100th sprint doesn't mean my previous 99 sprints are at the same speed, does it?
Let's simplify it for you. I sprint 100m 10 times in 100 seconds, and I collapse at the end of the 10th sprint, which took me 15 seconds to do.
Did I do all 10 sprints in 15 seconds?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Let's simplify it for you. I sprint 100m 10 times in 100 seconds, and I collapse at the end of the 10th sprint, which took me 15 seconds to do.Did I do all 10 sprints in 15 seconds?
Yeah, sure, writers suck at math. Stan Lee sucks at radiology and biology, so what?
My point, though, is super clear. Look how much effort you are expending trying to question everg single little thing, but with Tony and Hulk juggling suns(lol) you didn't even spend the time to actually read the words.
Originally posted by carver9
However you want to read that instance as fatigued, in pain. What we know is, he's experiencing something not comfortable during that instance. I don't know why you're asking me about time when the comic literally tells us he was going shy the speed of light. The comic is literally telling us how fast he went.
Originally posted by h1a8
I gave you some:
Hulk being held down by the weight of a star
Gladiator tearing apart a black holes with his hand
And some ones DS pointed out.
I'm going to repeat this again. The spear was created from an exploding sun, so yes, it's valid to me. If it was created from a tree branch, then no, the statement holds no weight.
I never agreed with Gladiator tearing a black hole with his hand. It didn't happen on panel, so the statement holds no weight. There's zero proof that Gladiator can tear a black hole with his bare hands.
DS doesn't know what he is talking about.
Originally posted by carver9
I'm going to repeat this again. The spear was created from an exploding sun, so yes, it's valid to me. If it was created from a tree branch, then no, the statement holds no weight.
I never agreed with Gladiator tearing a black hole with his hand. It didn't happen on panel, so the statement holds no weight. There's zero proof that Gladiator can tear a black hole with his bare hands.
DS doesn't know what he is talking about.
I do know exactly what I'm talking about.
When it suits you, you try and move heaven and earth and spend so much time and effort trying to argue narration.
Otherwise, you just accept wrong interpretations when it suits you without even bothering to read the words properly. This entire exercise proves it clearly😂
Originally posted by carver9
I'm going to repeat this again. The spear was created from an exploding sun, so yes, it's valid to me. If it was created from a tree branch, then no, the statement holds no weight.
I never agreed with Gladiator tearing a black hole with his hand. It didn't happen on panel, so the statement holds no weight. There's zero proof that Gladiator can tear a black hole with his bare hands.
DS doesn't know what he is talking about.
The point is, those were two character statements - not narration - one claiming the net had the weight of a star, and another saying it was "forged from a sun trapped in distorted space time". While the phrase "forged from a sun" doesn't necessarily mean it carries the weight of that sun - just like other fictional weapons forged from stars - you still accepted both statements despite clear discrepancies with what's actually shown.
Yet you have no problem rejecting DC statements - whether there's a discrepancy with what's shown or none at all.
Do you see the double standard now?
You argued tooth and nail that Gladiator tearing a black hole was true. That's how I knew about the showing. Have you changed your mind about that showing?
DS mentioned the million decibel showing that you argued against as well as some others.
Originally posted by h1a8
No need to.
If made aware of this fact, the writer would simply choose for Flash to save those people rather than limit his speed to below the speed of light and have the people die.
Well the writer told us it was under the speed of light. You should probably send them a tweet asking them to give you the calculations so they can tell you the same thing that the comic said.
Originally posted by h1a8
The point is, those were two character statements - not narration - one claiming the net had the weight of a star, and another saying it was "forged from a sun trapped in distorted space time". While the phrase "forged from a sun" doesn't necessarily mean it carries the weight of that sun - just like other fictional weapons forged from stars - you still accepted both statements despite clear discrepancies with what's actually shown.Yet you have no problem rejecting DC statements - whether there's a discrepancy with what's shown or none at all.
Do you see the double standard now?
You argued tooth and nail that Gladiator tearing a black hole was true. That's how I knew about the showing. Have you changed your mind about that showing?
DS mentioned the million decibel showing that you argued against as well as some others.
We either going to accept all statements or push away the hyperbolic statements. I'm ok with either since that would mean Hulk is more powerful than the entire Celestial race and is the strongest being in existence. Hyperbolic statements should not be used as factual whereas statements with clarity should be used. Statements of Onslaught being powerful than the Phoenix and Franklin should not be used as concrete evidence unless we truly want to put Hulk above those characters. Either way, I'm alright with it. Hulk has also been said to be more powerful than Galactus. Someone saying I can punch you in the face at femto second speeds is just someone boasting. Someone stopping a bullet at super speed and screaming out femto is hyperbole. I'm not saying hyperbolic statements are legit. I'm saying when the drawing match the wording, then it's ok to use.