Originally posted by peejayd * let me repeat to the Ryu fanboy: "the red outfit was trademarked to Ken not to stand out from Ryu, but to stand out from everybody else and to reflect Ken's flashy style of fighting"... and that was stated by Capcom, so shut the hell up...
OFFICIAL STATEMENTS READ BELOW
"He wears a red gi because when he trained with Ryu under Gouken, he saw
that Ryu was better so he wanted to stand out more and took on a red gi."
Taken from Ken's SF Canon Guide Profile
End of Debate, you fail.
Please, do not bring this up again, you are simply making yourself look foolish.
Not every character in game is going to have the "same advantage" some characters simply have far more then others.
In Ryu and Ken's case, Ryu has come out on the top more so then Ken has.
Originally posted by peejayd * you cannot even answer the open questions? what a loser... it seems like you just won a versus battle using Ryu and you made him a god... very revolting... you're stubborn and touchy, that's fanboyism... ๐ [/B]
Let me put it simply to you, my statements where never a "This is my opinion" statement.
I have made it very clearly to you, why I've stated Ryu>Ken, and that is because Capcom has officially stated Ryu>>>Ken. Ryu has proven this within the storyline of the SF Series that he is in fact the better fighter.
Ryu has been recognized by the super elites as the one with the most potential.
All of these are official, so what fanboyism are you really speaking of?
Who was it here that made Violent Ken the character that he actually wasn't meant to be.
"HAD" you of actually read Snk's official statement, you would have known that Violent Ken is a carbon copy of the SFII:AM Ken.
So again, the mere fact that you have never ever read the Canon SF Guide, the fact that you bring up "this is my opinions" and then try to back it up with with statements from comicbooks and the SF Animes...which btw, aren't even canon...who truly is the "insert character name" fanboy here?
I would only be a fanboy if this was a Ryu vs Gouki who would win thread and I kept on saying Ryu>>>>>>>>>Gouki because I said so.
However this is Ken...someone that Ryu is in fact, a better fighter over.
Originally posted by peejayd * tell me why Ryu was seduced by the Dark Hadou in the moment he struck Sagat with the Metsu Shoryuken? it was stated by Capcom that Ryu refused to accept defeat... the Metsu Shoryuken was a cheapshot while Sagat tried to help Ryu up, because Sagat knows the battle is over...* Ryu agreed to fight Ken fair and square... can't your thick skull admit that Ryu cheated Sagat? and Ken did not cheat to win the fight with Ryu?
Ryu did not rig the win over Sagat, even Sagat has claimed it to be a defeat on him against Ryu. So no, you are wrong, it's just atrocious for you to ride on this notion, when everyone on there has stated Ryu bested Sagat.
Not a "clean" win, but still a win, much like how Ken defeated Ryu, not a "clean" win, but still a win regardless.
Yet, does this even remove the fact that Ryu is still clearly better then Ken? Oh yeah, it doesn't, my point exactly.
Originally posted by peejayd * two wins in the tournament... but both Ken and Ryu made 20394892038209 match-ups, more than you'll ever know... logic dictates that in those matches, they have wins over each other... Ken is Ryu's eternal rival, not a jobber nor a punching bag...
Indeed, they are eternal rivals, however being rivals doesn't always mean "we are equal". It has been clear from Capcom's statements that it's been Ryu>>>>>>>>>>Ken majority of the times. Since Day #1...how many times do I have to tell you this.
How many times do I have to tell you that Ryu is the better fighter over Ken. He has bested Ken far, and alot more then Ken over Ryu, this has been mentioned, and stated very clearly.
So where does my statements lose water? Where? Ken defeats a Ryu consumed in conflict with Satsu-No-Hadou, Ken most likely defeated Ryu during SFII...yet Pre-SF1, and SFIII which is practically everything else, Ryu completely pawns him.
Have you've actually noticed that there has been only one match up that Ken has actually won in which Ryu most likely would have been in the fight (SFII). Yet Pre-SF1, and SFIII, all of the matches Ryu would have been in the fight, he's been the clear cut stronger, better fighter?
That should be pretty crystal clear to you, and please, if you bring up Sagat vs Ryu again, I'll just laugh. Considering again, if it was Ken vs Sagat...Ken would have gotten completely destroyed by Sagat, considering Ryu barely won, even though he was above Ken.
Originally posted by peejayd * how? that's just a fanboy statement...
That isn't a fanboy statement when Capcom has officially stated Ryu>>>>Ken Pre-SF1. So should we start calling Capcom liar's now?
Originally posted by peejayd * that's the point... Ryu knows how Ken fights and Ken knows how Ryu fights... that is why it is very illogical to say - like what you've said - that Ken cannot beat Ryu...
I never, not once stated that Ken did not beat Ryu, because Ken has actually achieved this. However, what I do say is this...Ryu is the far better, more stronger and better fighter then Ken.
Ryu has PROVEN this by besting Ken far more then what Ken has ever done to Ryu through out their entire life time together as rivals.
It has been stated by Capcom that Ryu is the better fighter over Ken.
How are these "fanboy" remarks, when Capcom has officially, remember, officially stated it so? You tell me, if anything, your the fanboy. Going on talking about how Violent Ken is "just as good" as Dark Ryu.
That's an absolute complete utter joke.
Originally posted by peejayd * are you blind? Sagat can destroy Ken as crystal clear as how Sagat destroyed Ryu... Ryu just cheated Sagat...
Very simple here, during SF1...
Sagat>Ryu>>>Ken, does that take away from the fact that Ryu was not better then Ken.
Like I've said before, all win's in SF aren't always clean...Alex defeated Gill and won SFIII, should he be as strong as Ryu or Ken now?
Get out of here man, Sagat did not destroy Ryu, he only had an upper hand.
Originally posted by peejayd * they are rivals...
Much like how Hwoarang is to Jin, yet Jin has beasted the monsters like T. Ogre and Hei/Kazuya/Jinpachi...should we start considering Hwoarang in the same league as Jin, just simply because Hwoarang can fight solidly against Jin?
Your a complete walking contradiction now, Ryu and Ken are rivals yes, but that doesn't remove the fact that it's still Ryu>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ken.
You can still be rivals even though your rival is much better then you are, hopefully that makes sense to you.
Originally posted by peejayd * you just laid out your cards... you are watching dumb players...
LOL...right, guys like Tomo Ohira, the greatest SFII Player of All Time who won 150+ Tournaments at a time when the competition for SFII was at it's absolute peak and competitive drive.
He only took 2nd place 4 times, and the rest where all 1st place finishes.
What about Daigo Umehara...you know, the guy who beasted Justin Wong another SF great during Evolution 2004...yeah...he must be a dumb player too right?
Oh wait...what about guys like Alex Valle, or the Wolfe Bros, or the japanese players like Kuni and Nuki, etc, etc.
Yes...all of these guys who play SF on the competitive lvl, that I've myself played more then once before in my lifetime..yep...these guys must be "dumb players right".
Yet if you where to ask anyone who's been the better overall character Tier Wise between Ryu and Ken within the SF series, they will all tell you very clearly Ryu.
A players abilities can only go so far...you mean to tell me that someone like Sean in SFIII:3S who has crappy hit-confirms, crappy Super Arts, horrible options is just as good as someone like Yun. Who with Genei-Jin can destroy you for nearly half your life with a single hit-confirm from Genei-Jin.
Or that T.Hawk in ST has as many options as someone like Balrog who can mix up throw option you to death, or high/low mixups, with a powerful rushdown game, not to mention the best super in the entire game.
Please man, you have no idea what you are speaking too. The mere fact that you say "It's all about the player not the character" tells me every notion that you have never played a serious tournament in your life.
When you see tournaments like Evolution, where the best players from around the world coming from Japan, S. Korea, Europe, etc, etc, and obviously the US (since it's held in the US) come together and play a game like SFIII:3S.
Guess who's almost always in the Top 8 Place finishes...you guessed it...Yun, Chunli, Chunli, Chunli, Ken, Yun, Chunli, and a random Makoto here and there.
If it was all about "characters" skills...why aren't more top Ryu players placing in the top 8? Why is it always dominated by Yun, Chun, and Ken?
Plain and simple, these three characters have far more advantages over the other characters.
Originally posted by brainchild81
-snip-
Considering Ken openly admitted that Ryu>>>>>>>>>>>>Ken, reasons why he dunned the Red Gi.
I guess people here fail to realize that you can still be rivals even though you may not be as good as your rival.
Ever seen Sagat and Adon...Sagat is leagues better then Adon, yet they are rivals.
Get the facts straight, Ryu is stronger, better then Ken.