I don't know if anyone has seen this list, but it's appalling. When the first console listed is described by, "The Virtual Boy would've been higher on our list, but it was made by Nintendo," you know you're in trouble. It just seems full of constant Sega bashing. I wanted to see what you guys thought of this list.
That and the fact that his entire opinions seem to be soley based on graphics and his ridiculous Sega bias(I don't think there was a single Sega consol to miss the list) lead me to believe he is an idiot.
Yeah, that list is completely biased. The Sega Saturn at the time was a more graphically inclined system that had a more diverse gaming catalogue than PS1. I wouldn't put the Saturn near the top, but certainly not near the bottom.
The Dreamcast as well. There is no need to even comment why this is a ridiculous system to include on top five worst consoles.
Lastly, the sega genesis. Saying that the Sega Genesis is the worst system of all time is like saying the SNES is the worst system of all time. Granted, the SNES had a few advantages. The graphics were generally better and the games were far more popular, but not necessarily better. The Genesis and SNES were essentially the same systems. They just generally focused on different types of games.
The virtual boy and the 32X are definitely contenders, especially the Virtual boy since it was way overpriced, caused injuries and only had a dozen or two games in it's library.
The only thing that kind of bugs me about this list is the Dreamcast. The Dreamcast was too expensive? It was $199 if I recall. And the Genesis did NOT kill it. Lack of third party support and the PS2 killed it.