Problem is that CO2 levels do not necessarily correlate with periods of global warming [throughout history] because it is not the exclusive driver of climate change. Earth has a mechanism to absorb CO2 emissions in large quantities and even re-adjust its environment when subjected to anomalies.
Climate change is a very complex phenomenon; a large number of factors are involved including movements of Earth and Solar activity.
In-fact, Sun has the power to cook Earth with its powerful emissions.
Last edited by S_W_LeGenD on Aug 16th, 2017 at 04:04 PM
Those are some batshit crazy settings you are using to trust science. The idea of "every variable is accounted for" is night impossible and cannot be proven at all. What we use to describe the universe (among other things) are mathematical models that never change because we invented them so they don't change, science is consistent for conventional reasons. Heck, there are even good arguments that make the idea of consistent/unchanging maths not allowing to demostrate everything: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%...teness_theorems
I'm just making this note because a lot of people consistently misrepresent how science works, not as an excuse for people to follow shitty climate predicting models.
Carbon dioxide makes the earth greener. But they didnt know that, anything with a unusual sounding name must be bad. But somehow drinking flouride must be good cause someone said so.
Only in bizzaro word is carbon dioxide bad and flouride good, only a stupid government could get its stupid people to believe it.
Last edited by Sable on Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:43 PM
nobody says carbon dioxide is "bad". the problem is that we're producing too much of it.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 16th, 2017 03:53 PM
