CorderaMitchell
Zitz! Rash! Pimple!
No Teamates, don't let this articulation and rugged good looks of this guy persuade you from your common sense, he has intelligence, but you have wisdom and enlightenment to counter it, stick to your prudence and dont waddle out your comfort zone.........Use your prudence to discern what is right or wrong and skip the words that you don't understand.
See my problem is not you pointing out the errors in the arguments of others or mine at all, feel free to. But if you are going to point them out and not explain why, its like saying " you're wrong because you're wrong" despite the size of the words you use , which I know the meaning of well, like you said, well dressed shit is still shit. Don't criticize and not explain, if thats too hard than why bother posting?
See there's this thing I don't like called contradiction, or a go against. It's when somebody makes themselves eat their own words. It was said stats alone are insufficient data. Only later to use a tier hierarchy as an valid point. NO, no,no.
It's like subject a saying, that spidey's muscles are stronger and more dense due to his strength. Then B explicitly proclaims this alone is insufficent data. Later subject B says wolvies musles are better because of his larger trapezius, latissimus dorsi, pectoral, and deltoid muscle. That is the contradiction I mean.
We've already established in explicit detail that logic is not an actual fact( what is fact), that it is a genre or library of detail that affects our reasoning,but is agreed upon at the same time, in easy terms. We do however need a common medium to communicate upon. It is good logic to say that a hit to the head is more likely than not to cause unconsciouness or critical damage to the body than the foot, because it is the center of information of the body, and controls functions, and a sufficient blow will shut the brain down, in a minor sense, temporarily, or cause lasting damage etc. etc. Anyone in here with an IQ over 80 (if yours is lower, you shouldn't be here) agrees upon this concept, and it is proven time and time again, therefore it is a good and reliable piece of reasoning and logic to use and support your data with.
Thanks for support while I was at court, and look this over more than once before you respond, please, i want this to be understood and agreed upon by everyone.