LoL, this is going nowhere. With Phoenix in the lineup, JLA loses. That is my only point.
Superman is not invulnerable to everything else. Jesus God. Is Superman invulnerable to telepathic attacks, for example? The power cosmic? Concussive blasts? As I stated, invulnerability, when used in reference to comic book characters, does NOT mean that a character is impervious to ALL physical attacks. Can Superman TODAY survive a direct hit from nuke? NO, fully powered or not.
I also stated that ROGUE is invulnerable. Binary knocked her ass into orbit with ONE punch, and she (Rogue) was about to get her ass handed to her until the other X-Men intervened. Invulnerability, if nothing else, gives one an IDEA of how much physical punishment a certain character can absorb. Nothing more.
Dark Phoenix, for example, would INCINERATE Superman - absolutely DEMOLISH him. Let him marinate in the sun for 20 years and she would STILL dismiss him with just a thought. It has NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING to do with his "solar reserves."
Getting knocked out does not necessarily mean you are hurt. Superman is not impervious to physical injury. He was hurt. Read the issue yourself. Like the number?
Superman's "reserves" were not depleted during the Doomsday battle. Let it go. Superman's reserves do NOT have to be depleted for him to get CRUSHED. LoL, if they WERE depleted, the fight would have lasted 1 1/2 minutes - you fail to realize just how powerful Doomsday is. Superman CANNOT defeat Doomsday again, reserves or otherwise. Doomsday CAN defeat Superman again. Superman CANNOT defeat The Shaggy Man. The Shaggy Man CAN defeat Superman, reserves or otherwise. You are incorrect as regards to Superman. Read up on more Superman battles all across the internet and you will see WHY.
Supreme durability does NOT mean that one is invulnerable. Hulk's durability is listed as demi-godlike. Wolverine walked through him in the #340's (although Hulk was about to kick his runt ass before they stopped the fight). Seen Spiderman's rating for durability?
"Read minds at the speed of light." What does this have to do with anything?
X-Men do not even have "far" more members than the JLA does. Will give you a list after giving you - or anyone else - a little more time to research their roster.
Re: Speed of light, wrong again. This is exactly why they say Superman and others CANNOT exceed the speed of light. Read JLA #2 with the Flash battle. LoL, why do you THINK that Flash NEVER runs at the speed of light on earth (or otherwise)? Like some quotes? And by the way, he cannot throw an object at light speed if he cannot RUN at light speed, now can he?
"Now able to run at speeds >>> approaching<<<< the speed of light, West donned the scarlet costume of The Flash to protect his hometown of Central City from any rogues who would consider causing it harm."
"The effect of the Speed Force on the original two Flashes was to grant them the ability to move at superhuman speeds, often at their peak moving at >>>a good fraction of light speed.<<<"
"This allows him not only to run at >>>near<<< light speed, but also to "vibrate" his body's molecules, enabling him to pass through solid matter. The Flash's speed has deteriorated somewhat with age."
"Powered by the extradimensional Speed Force, he can not only move at >>>near-lightspeed,<<<< but can transfer speed to and from others."
Like other "scientific" references when discussing moving at light-speed? This is AURORA from Alpha Flight.
"It was once theoretically possible for her to reach 99% of the speed of light (286,272 miles per second in a vacuum), although she never traveled at anywhere near that speed since if she did, >>>>she would wreak great damage upon herself end her environment.<<<<"
Wonder why it states that she would wreak great damage upon herself and the environment? Need other references of comic book feats being bound by the laws of physics when discussing objects moving at light speed on EARTH?
I did not "theorize," I have been debating Flash's abilities/battles - and others - for years. I know I am correct, and I know why I am correct. We also had this very same discussion on the other messageboard (comixfan.com) wherein the moderators backed me up. Like that link as well?