WindDancer
THE LOOSE CANNON
Originally posted by The Omega
WindDancer> But your philosophers are not experts – obviously. They did NOT prove the existence of God. If they did – humour me: Show me 😉
So with that statement I can see that you will either reject or not acknowledge ANY philosophical proofs of God. Or are YOU a better expert than philosophers? Besides, I'm not a jester and you're not a queen so I'm not here for your amusement. 😉 😛
But for the purpose of the argument. I'm willing to discuss philosophical thoughts of God as long as they are taken seriously. No, I'm not saying we can't find humor in a discussion, but is better to keep humor out and be a little bit serious. After all, these are our opinions, right? If you're willing to, we can start a philosophical arguement with Ex Nihilo and Cogitatum. Or maybe Emanation?.
Originally posted by The Omega
And there is a big difference between scientists investigating something which is THERE for all to see, gravity, planets and moons, and philosophers discussing the possible existence of a superhuman being. Which can be neither seen, heard, felt, tasted, touched or measured.
I agree, there is a big difference between scientist and philosophers. But back in the ol' days science and philosophy held hands together. After all scientist obey their laws and their experiments from which their facts come from. But occasionaly they do tend to change or revise their theories. Philosophers think too much and scientist are materialist.
Originally posted by The Omega
But you obviously believe in God, right? Then are we Gods children or are we NOT Gods children? God is God, right?
This God and we being his children topic really bothers you, or what? 😑
Saying I keep bringing this up is NOT answering my questions, nor participating the debate.
Tell me: Why is the opposite of free will being completely without will. How about free will under a caring Gods caring supervision?
I believe in God? from a philosophical perspective.... yes!. After all there are conversations about God without religious dogmatism.
No, it doesn't bother me, but the Christian concept of God is our father and we are his/her children is getting too repetative. Let's move from that idealism to a more different approach. As for our free will we make the choices. I don't think God dictates our will. If he did we would be perfect. And that's not the case in reality. God gave us free will to test our abilities to act. The consequences of our free will come from the choices we make. God did not cause the consequences of our free will. We did!
Originally posted by The Omega
No, you’re absolutely right. Not all scientists take religion seriously (fortunately they don’t have to anymore – the Inquisition is over). Why should they? Science is not about being RIGHT, it’s about facts.
“fundamentalism
noun {U}
the belief in old and traditional forms of religion, or the belief that what is written in a holy book, such as the Christian Bible, is completely true.”
So – Science can’t be fundamentalist. Sorry 😉
It was meant to be a pun. Religious ppl accept facts from what their Holy books tell them. Scientists accept facts from what their books tell them. In other words both sides consult their books about facts.
Originally posted by The Omega
Oh, and you were the one calling Science a child. Science, which has given us medicine, airplanes, computers, men on the Moon and so on and so forth endlessly. Technology is based on science - yes, if you call science a child, then what is technology in your world-view? A baby????
That was meant to be a metaphor. Unfortunally, I made it the wrong way. Instead of science, it shoulda have been "scientist". As in Scientists and Religious ppl are like children, fighting to prove one is right and the other is wrong. No biggie, I wasn't trying to offend those that accept science as the ultimate truth of our lives. I'll keep metaphors out. I'm not very good at them.