Originally posted by AllianceNo. 3 would imply he knows shit about sexual reproduction too.
He was implying that it has to be chosen because gay couple don't raise gay children. Therefore, he's saying that its not genetic..There are three flaws with this argument.
1. It assumes that homosexulaity is a cause of one trait.
2. It assumes that if both parents express a trait, the child will.
3. It assumes that homosexual couples can have children that are biologically thiers.Basically, he knows shit about genetics.
Once again, I have to ask those who subscribe to the notion that homosexuality is a learned or taught behavior follow up that claim with some evidence from their own childhoods that an illuminate the rest of us on teh subject. I mean, I'm all for evidence that homosexuality is a practice in instructional behavior, but I don't see it....especially given my own childhood experiences. And that shold be one thing that's considered by so many of the people that assume it's taught; they themselves can never provide examples of this education. They can bloat themselves up and act all high and mighty about it, but they never seem to have the evidence to back it up. For every example of "straight-raising", there's a comprable example of how a homosexual recieved the same instruction, encouragement, discipline, condemnation, etc... but reached a different conclusion.
So, stop being stupid, back up your bullshit claims, and stop waiting until the thread has reached a point where you can toss out the same disproven, bullshit like it's the first time someone has raised the issue and act like you're a genius for having thought of it.
Originally posted by FeceMan
I'm not sure the Founding Fathers would approve.
Originally posted by FeceMan
His "having fun" infringes upon several of my Constitutional rights. I'm not sure which ones they are, but I'm sure they're in there.
Not sure...doubt it. Poor you.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
you're not helping.
Did I ever say that was my goal ?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
hes just having fun.
👆
It always amazes me when a Conservative Christian is layed back and loose, while a Gay Liberal is uptight and overtly serious. I guess I should stop stereotyping then....
Originally posted by Feceman
His "having fun" infringes upon several of my Constitutional rights. I'm not sure which ones they are, but I'm sure they're in there.
Oh Please
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Once again, I have to ask those who subscribe to the notion that homosexuality is a learned or taught behavior follow up that claim with some evidence from their own childhoods that an illuminate the rest of us on teh subject. I mean, I'm all for evidence that homosexuality is a practice in instructional behavior, but I don't see it....especially given my own childhood experiences. And that shold be one thing that's considered by so many of the people that assume it's taught; they themselves can never provide examples of this education. They can bloat themselves up and act all high and mighty about it, but they never seem to have the evidence to back it up. For every example of "straight-raising", there's a comprable example of how a homosexual recieved the same instruction, encouragement, discipline, condemnation, etc... but reached a different conclusion.So, stop being stupid, back up your bullshit claims, and stop waiting until the thread has reached a point where you can toss out the same disproven, bullshit like it's the first time someone has raised the issue and act like you're a genius for having thought of it.
I think Regret should read this post....I will PM it to him right now 👆
Originally posted by Lord Urizen
[BIt always amazes me when a Conservative Christian is layed back and loose, while a Gay Liberal is uptight and overtly serious. I guess I should stop stereotyping then....[/B]
there is a difference between being offensive in order to provoke thought and just being a child who needs a 'time out'.