Originally posted by Schecter
without power they would have no shields or weapons.
without shields their hulls would be torn apart. werent you paying attention in wrath of khan and just about every other film?
Depends on what you use. there is the GL Star Wars Universe and the Star Wars EU Universe, which contains GL's Universe but adds too it, it's quasi canon. And GL himself said that the Dark Empire comics would be a perfect sequal to the movies if he ever decided to make them, so I dont know where you got the ill conceived part. Also, Lucas Arts has said that all of the games, such as KOTOR, are part of continuity and soon so will Star Wars: Force Unleashed (ya know.. the one where a single padawan brings down a Star Destroyer by himself. Yeah I rolled my eyes at that garbage too.).
Originally posted by Kahless
ok, they cant hurt the hulls because in star wars, they use lasersnow in startrek, spcifiaclly the episode "the outragous Ocana" the crew of the enterprise discuss how laser do not harm the hull of federation starships.
since starwars vessals use lasers.... they cannot hurt federation vessals w/o shields, let alone those with several layers of shielding
" DATA: Sensors report a minimum range combat craft of the Squadron Class, twenty-six crew.
WORF: Captain, they have locked lasers.
PICARD: Lasers?
RIKER: That won't even penetrate our navigational deflectors.
Literary method: they seem to be saying that their navigational deflectors are immune to lasers, probably because lasers are supposed to be less advanced than phasers. Some people feel that this means any Federation ship could shrug off any laser, even a monster laser that can blow up planets. Others feel that Riker was factoring the ship's small size into account, and that his statement was not meant to be so over-arching. However, it is impossible to conclusively resolve this argument one way or another unless we can get some kind of official statement from the author on the episode, and that's not forthcoming.
Suspension of Disbelief: it is scientifically impossible for any kind of shield to block infinite amounts of laser energy, because the second law of thermodynamics prohibits 100% efficiency devices and light carries momentum equal to U/c, so there are two mechanisms through which increased power levels would eventually overwhelm any blocking system. Therefore, Riker was either an idiot or he was taking the enemy ship's small size into account when he made his statement. Case closed.
It should be noted that Graham Kennedy (ditl.org) has concocted a bizarre rationalization for his infinite laser protection argument, where the ship simply becomes transparent to lasers and they pass right through. Needless to say, he cannot present actual evidence of lasers passing through the ship ... "