I have no ultimate opinion on the winner as of now (I really don't care), but there's several things flawed in your points, ESB.
Originally posted by ESB Vader
and this fight is on tatooine, vader would blind dooku with sand then chop him,
This has got to be the most ridiculous thing said up to this point. I could just as easily say by some type of rare, freakish chance lightning strikes on Tatooine and goes straight for Vader's suit as it's metal, and thus dies instantly. It's basic demonstrating absurdity by being absurd. The aforementioned outcome would not happen (or rather not be accepted).
o and vader has 20 years of DS experience and dooku has like only what? 13? vader has a wider range or DS powers,
And Dooku has about 70+ years of experience as a Force user. Your point? Seven years isn't that much difference when you consider Dooku years of more general experience. And he hardly has a wider array of Force powers, a few simple more demonstrated (Dooku used Force grip on Kenobi, so it's ridiculous to assume he doesn't know Force choke). Dooku has Force lightning, the weakness of Vader. So, he hardly has more (that would be useful).
and advent, vader used the force thing to block han solos bolts i dont see why he cant block lightning with that, yoda used that to block a yinchoris blast and used that to block lightning, no difference i think
That'd be illogical to claim such. You'd be saying because Vader can block blaster bolts, he can block Force lightning. I mean, despite the fact that the ROTS Visual Dictionary states that Vader cannot successfully repel (or conjur) Force lightning as it requires living hands to do so.
It's a simple case to make. The nature of the two attacks are not the same, ergo we cannot say "since he blocked attack X, he can block Y". They have different properties, unless a blaster bolt has the same characteristics as Force lightning.
(Hint: It doesn't.)
he owns dooku in saber conbat, makashi cant fight up to shien, ROTS novel proved this
1.) Makashi cannot generate enough kinetic energy to meet Djem So head on (key).
2.) By no means is Makashi incapable of actually "fighting up" (WTF?) to Djem So. This is proven by the fact the Star Wars Insider article in Issue 62 says that Vaapad is "more open and kinetic than Form V". Now, this alone isn't enough to prove the case, but we all know Sora Bulq was a fine Vaapad master yet he was tooled by Dooku.
So it's not as if Makashi is utterly useless against Djem So. At least Dooku's prowess of Makashi. Though, I will say Vader still has the form advantage over Dooku, but it's not as if he'll just win like that as you are apparently implying.
Originally posted by ESB Vader
number1) the emperor commanded vader not to hurt luke but instead lure him to the dark side,number2) vader wouldnt kill his own son
According to the novelizations in which you are so fond of, you are wrong. Following this point on, expect nothing but quotes and simple sentences:
"This accusation really made Vader angry. He could tolerate much from the insolent child, but this was insufferable. He must teach this boy a lesson he would never forget, or die learning."
"His anger was layered, now - he did not want to win if the boy was not battling to the fullest. But if winning meant he had to kill a boy who wouldn't fight...then he could do that, too."
You were saying?
number3)vader underestimated him because he has beat him before, in terms of saber combat luke is still the same as he was in ESB only his force powers grew
Prove this statement. Actually, no. Logically speaking this is wrong by pure nature. To assume ROTJ Luke didn't grow in dueling ability is ridiculous because he faired far better in ESB than in ROTJ (even before he started attacking like a madman), and hell, he went to train with Yoda longer. Also:
"Vader watched Luke. His boy was powerful, stronger than he'd imagined. "
"Vader was impressed with Luke's speed. Pleased, even."
Maybe he underestimated him in the very beginning, afterwards he did not. He even goes so far as to gauge his skills. So this is out the window.
number4) vader panicked when he pissed luke off, remember luke owning him and vader kept walking back wards?
How can you call it "panicked"? This isn't necessarily wrong, but the choice of words seem to imply that Vader walked backwards on purpose (well, you did say that, lol). According to both the novelization and script he was forced back:
"Blow upon blow, Luke forced Vader to retreat - back, onto the bridge that crossed the vast, seemingly bottomless shaft to the power core. Each stroke of Luke's saber pummeled Vader, like accusations, like screams, like shards of hate. The Dark Lord was driven to his knees. He raised his blade to block yet another onslaught - and Luke slashed Vader's right hand off at the wrist. '
The script also near exactly described this same event. Of course, as I already said, the way you chose to type that sentence seems a little different. I just want to make it clear.
number6) in the rotj duel, vader was not angry, the real battle was in him, the conflict of vader and anakin, luke said "i sense the good in you, the conflict"
Actually, Vader did get very angry during the duel as you can see by the first quotes I provided; although he did simmer down eventually.
Keep in mind, though, I'm not arguing Dooku > Vader, so do not treat my response as such (with things like, "z0mg vad3r k1lls d0o0oku wit 1 hand!!//ONELEVEN111!!/"😉, because quite frankly, I don't care.