Master Crimzon
Baby Killer
Yeah, Faunus, you're right. But I really can't resist when somebody spews enough bullshit to claim that "Anakin > Dooku". In TECHNICAL SKILL.
Originally posted by Taven
Which is what all evidence points to, and your burden of proof if you wish to claim it.
Lightsnake owned that theory already.
Originally posted by Taven
Irrelevant on his lightsaber technique.
Quite right, but it speaks for his overall ability as a Jedi/Sith (labelled one of the greatest ever by the RotS novel).
Originally posted by Taven
Unsupported; I don't recall any source commenting on his learning potential.
The 'Temple's Greatest Student' (STRONGEST, too)- when not having any sort of age advantage over the other 'students'- would mean that Dooku's learning and training potential as far above average.
Oh, and he was also seen as 'the greatest failure'; why, you would ask? Probably because he had the most potential out of the many defecting Dark Jedi. Sora Bulq and Depa Billaba among them.
Originally posted by Taven
In an Order full of numerous races with enhanced life spans (a setting where humans in fact also possess as much, and where "80" won't be relatively as high), and where the Force can slow down a Jedi's aging, it'd be ridiculous to claim that Dooku possessed an anomalous length of time to train in lightsaber combat, and that due to that (and other as insignificant points) he's somehow going to stand out amongst the ten very best in an Order of thousands.
'We argue virtue of what we know.'
Now, that's your statement. Dooku not only has incredible learning potential (as the Yoda statement proves, and the Qui-Gon statement, if we are to go by your logic, proves as well), he is also older than any of the people you listed- FAR older- and I don't recall any of them displaying particularly superior learning potential in saber combat in comparison to him. Ergo? Dooku has more time and just as much natural talent to train his saber skills, and therefore is logically a more proficient technical user of saber combat than they are.
Originally posted by Taven
His "unequaled" status loses its value when you consider how underused the form was.
And? I already proved that it's the form that requires the most finesse, grace, and, in turn, technical skill. Being the unparalleled, complete master of it would put his technical skill at "DA UBERZ" level.
Originally posted by Taven
Which can likely be said for any Jedi Guardian (the lightsaber dueling part; the elegance is irrelevant), one of the more prominent classes in an Order of thousands. Even when combined with your other points (his age, Makashi being supposedly the best, technically), this holds no value with the scope we're dealing in this discussion.
I know. But now, name a prominent Jedi saber master who is older than Dooku, has just as much love for saber practice, an obsession with grace, finesse, skill, and class, and also mastered his form of choice to an extent similar to Dooku.
... you can't, can you?
Originally posted by Taven
Enough to make him stand out as one of the ten greatest technical swordsman in an Order of thousands, among or over beings who's mastery has been far better defined? You haven't come close to proving such a claim.
Dooku is possibly the most refined swordsman- certainly in his form of choice- in history. He is more refined, more skilled, better practiced, and has just as much natural talent as anyone you listed- he also has incredible dueling experience.
Yeah, he's that good.
Originally posted by Taven
Again, age is not the be all end all. Given how Kas'im mastered all seven forms in under ten years for all three primary form of lightsaber combat, his learning potential was clearly incredible. He then spent decades (far longer than it originally took him to learn them) perfecting all of them. Not to mention, my point was to illustrate how encompassing these forms were. I wasn't comparing Kas'im to Dooku (not a good one for the Makashi master).
You're right, age isn't everything. But Dooku has raw power, learning potential, and prodigious skill/natural talent to go along with his age; while his mastery of the saber is nowhere near as broad as Kas'im's, his mastery of dueling is undoubtedly superior.
Originally posted by Taven
Irrelevant, not to mention wrong. What has Dooku ever displayed that compares to defending against Force attacks that possess the force to tear through temples?
Tooling Ventress by lifting his finger, pushing back/lifting up/disarm Quinlan simultaneously, owning Bulq with lightning- I could go on and on. The temple was old, and the force attack was relatively indirect, uncontrolled, and born of anger. Dooku is certainly a greater force user than Kas'im. Kas'im didn't display any where near his offensive mastery of the force or Dooku's refinement.
Originally posted by Taven
Arguable, not that I was attempting to do so (argue the point).
Alright.
Originally posted by Taven
That's exactly what I'm doing. His skill stood out as the best amongst twenty generations of students, by the guy who trained them all. When has Dooku's skill in itself ever been held in such high regard?
Being called one of the greatest Jedi in history (also the temple's STRONGEST student), when his combat prowess was born out of his lightsaber mastery? Strength = combat prowess, for a combat-oriented Jedi/Sith.
Originally posted by Taven
So praise = admission of inferiority? Nice to know. I guess, given that Qui-Gon was a master swordsman by anyone's standards, he's therefore #1 himself.
Yeah, sorry about that.
Originally posted by Taven
I've responded to all of this. It's all either irrelevant, insignificant, unsupported, or illogical.
And I have done the same to you, and proven my points. Again.
Originally posted by Taven
Depends with the scale we're dealing with. It certainly doesn't compare to the praise Qui-Gon receives in relation to twenty generations of Jedi students, nor does it make him stand out amongst ten out of an Order of thousands.
Yeah, sure. Only that Dooku is older, displayed more natural talent, is called a legendary duelist (on the grand scale of things), and led Yoda to believe that only he and Mace would be a match for Dooku in lightsaber combat? And both use the force far more heavily than Dooku while lightsaber dueling.
Originally posted by Taven
Already responded to this.
Same.
Originally posted by Taven
I'm ridiculous? Sidi-Boy, I've tried to be polite to you and stuff, and I think because of that you don't quite realise just how stupid and poorly placed your points have been. I'm sorry, but until Dooku's lightsaber mastery can be defined as even the same league as some of these guys, there's no logical basis in claiming that he holds the position you give him.
I could say the same to you. C'mon, Nebaris. We both know you're not a moron, so why do you bother making those arguments? Do you just disagree with everyone for the sake of standing out?
Originally posted by Taven
No, your points have involved a mixture of illogical, insignificant, irrelevant and unsupported. You haven't established anything, other than that Dooku was pretty good when dealing with a scale infinitely smaller than the one we're dealing with.
Ha. Ha. Ha.
I've already demonstrated that Dooku's technical skill is teh uberz- he has natural talent (a LOAD of it), a passion for saber combat- well, saber skill, dueling, and elegance is more like it- unrivaled among those people you listed- incredible age, more than anyone significant we know of- and you still consider him only 'pretty good'?
What is this rubbish? All Jedi use the Force to aid them physically and mentally in combat. That you'd assume Dooku wouldn't is too stupid to put into words.
Originally posted by Taven
No, you clearly can't comprehend what Qui-Gon was saying. He was commenting on Dooku's natural partiality for fencing, and that was it. That all those traits were natural to Dooku is a comment on how accustomed to the art he was. It's not a comment on prowess.
So, decide. Either Dooku has no spectacular natural prowess, or he has incredible natural prowess (which is what you're ARGUING Qui-Gon was saying). You've spat out two points that contradict each other. In the same friggin' debate.