Death Penalty

Started by Spelljammer88 pages

How so? We're the ones declaring war on them, you rant how that's wrong and they are people too yet want to blame US for them having weapons, drugs, and power over innocent lives as a neo-fascist state?

Are you smoking the crack they sell?

Originally posted by Spelljammer
How so? We're the ones declaring war on them, you rant how that's wrong and they are people too yet want to blame US for them having weapons, drugs, and power over innocent lives as a neo-fascist state?

Are you smoking the crack they sell?


You declared war on China? Must have missed that one......

And this is a whole different issue....saying that killing is wrong doesn't justify the Professional Killing of peoplöe (Professional Killing being Death Penalty as well as War)

China is of no threat to us, they're just a bunch of pissed off commies we use as slave labour.. Not saying that's a good thing, but that's as far as it go's..

Originally posted by Spelljammer
China is of no threat to us, they're just a bunch of pissed off commies we use as slave labour.. Not saying that's a good thing, but that's as far as it go's..

So you are not declaring war on them...why did you say that then?

Originally posted by Bardock42
So you are not declaring war on them...why did you say that then?

SpellJammer was talking about the middle-east. They sell drugs and terrorize and declare fascist law. Yet liberals defend them.

Originally posted by Spelljammer
SpellJammer was talking about the middle-east. They sell drugs and terrorize and declare fascist law. Yet liberals defend them.

Because not the Middle East sells the but some People From The Middle East......and the U.S.A. did not declare war for drugs.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
Because not the Middle East sells the but some People From The Middle East......and the U.S.A. did not declare war for drugs.....

The democrats did a couple of years ago. (Though we all know they're well known for not finishing what they started.)

Bush declared war on terrorism which though to Spellammer personaly is not as important as getting rid of drugs, it will indirectly bring them down to near zero because most drugs come from overseas. IE: The Middle-East.

a. the drugs will still be there

b. in the US, you should worry more about South America.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
a. the drugs will still be there

Well ofcourse drugs will still be there. But SpellJammer's driving teacher use to work for the military, he said 80some% of drugs come from The Middle-East.

That's a whole lotof crack..

For world distribution, sure. But for what floods into the US, look to your southern border.

But it is your talk of bringing them down to near zero which I was saying "the drugs will still be there" about. No it won't.

Originally posted by Spelljammer
And? They sell a product that ruins lives, makes people become slaves to a substance, and can break apart families, and leave children victimized the most..

What's suprising is how you defend these people. Are you the devil or something?

Yes, that's right. They're the Devil. Because everything can be simplified to a matter of good and evil. Everything is black and white. People might argue that you don't acknowledge the ambiguities and complexities of social issues such as this, but why do that when you can put everything into superstitious categories of "Left" and "Right"? That way, whenever you encounter someone with a point of view you don't agree with, you can just call them names such as "Leftist" and dismiss their argument, regardless of its validity. Who wants to have to scrutinise everything anyway? Who wants to think for themselves when our television and politicians do that for us? It requires less mental effort to defend people instead of principles. If it's adored with nationalistic imagery, it must be righteous.

You have been conditioned by your culture to blindly accept whatever your government decides to do. Anything that might generate dissent is scandolised by Fox News and the like so that any anti-Republicanism--or as they call it, anti-Americanism--is supressed with threats of marginalisation by society. Nobody wants to be on their own in a point of view. It's easier to go with the crowd and be just another mindless cheerleader than to actually question the justice of your own countries actions.

Originally posted by DarkAge

You have been conditioned by your culture to blindly accept whatever your government decides to do.

😆
If that were the case. SpellJammer would be a die-hard liberal. They control the media, our libraries, our schools..

Anything that might generate dissent is scandolised by Fox News and the like so that any anti-Republicanism--or as they call it, anti-Americanism--is supressed with threats of marginalisation by society.

FOX may be somewhat conservative, but it's hardly comparible to the MANY liberal outlets. MSNBC News, The New York Times, hell, it's even effecting our comedy as SNL has become a cespool of cheap shots at president Bush. Which by the way proves liberals have no sense of humor..

Nobody wants to be on their own in a point of view. It's easier to go with the crowd and be just another mindless cheerleader than to actually question the justice of your own countries actions.

There's more liberals then conservatives. So what does this tell you? You're right, SpellJammer wouldn't like to be alone in how he thinks, no-one wants to be alone, we yearn for companionship. But he'd rather be alone then have no morales. That's something the goverment had no bearing on SpellJammer. He's not a tool, maybe you should rethink where you stand. And come to the relization that you're just being used by the liberal hive-mind. The sooner you accept the truth, the sooner you can choose to be a free thinking individual. The truth shall set you free.

Hahaha.

NASA: There's no gravity in space.
Spelljammer: That'll be the liberals.

-AC

Actually there is gravity in space. Just very very little..

Originally posted by Spelljammer
Actually there is gravity in space. Just very very little..

Actually there is Gravity everywhere....the only reason we circle the sun is gravity..we just wouldn't be ion the Gravitorial Field of the Earth anymoer...or at least jsut very little....

Originally posted by Bardock42
Actually there is Gravity everywhere....the only reason we circle the sun is gravity..we just wouldn't be ion the Gravitorial Field of the Earth anymoer...or at least jsut very little....

Exactly. Gravity is also the weakest form of energy. It just encompasses all matter..

It's not energy..it's a Force...actually it'S not even that...it'S just a bending of space.....

Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental fources, so it is weaker than the Strong Atomic Force, the Electromagnetic Force and the Weak Atomic Force.

Originally posted by shaber
Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental fources, so it is weaker than the Strong Atomic Force, the Electromagnetic Force and the Weak Atomic Force.

Pluis..it isn't even a force....

Originally posted by shaber
Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental fources, so it is weaker than the Strong Atomic Force, the Electromagnetic Force and the Weak Atomic Force.

Doesn't it strike you as odd that in alchemy there was four elements that dictate us and in science there is four "forces"?

People think ancients were primitive and stupid, but they really weren't. They just explained things differantly for a differant time..