Death Penalty

Started by soleran3088 pages

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
As face-peelingly witty as that off the cuff remark was, it doesn't actually disprove what I just said.

-AC

Well I found nothing witty about that statement I wrote just the facts......

Anyway you never prove anything you say as its just a personal belief system and not justifiable by anything other than your little part of the world (namely your head) So like it or not if you don't have a solution for the death penalty why do you keep yammering on about it.....

But but everyone does what they want cuz its their choice and its none of your business, ok yes I summed up what you have said over and over again.........So back on topic the Death penalty serves a purpose and it is implemented all over the world and it can get ugly in countries out of the US like you cannot defend yourself you are just guilty.

There's worst things in life then contradiction lil bitchiness. For someone with a temper like your's, SpellJammer is suprised your so "sentimental" towards criminals.

Infact, alot of liberals seem to have an unholy temper, what? Are you trying to compensate?

Evil suceeds when goodmen do nothing. If you want to be guilty of asscosiation, that's your problem. But SpellJammer, and a host of other people who still have a soul, would rather see justice served. Capital punishment isn't pretty, nice, or full of yummy gumdrops, then again what they did to get in the position there at wasn't nice and full of gumdrops neither.

Responsibility. A lesson all liberals need to learn..

Originally posted by Spelljammer
There's worst things in life then contradiction lil bitchiness. For someone with a temper like your's, SpellJammer is suprised your so "sentimental" towards criminals.

Infact, alot of liberals seem to have an unholy temper, what? Are you trying to compensate?

Evil suceeds when goodmen do nothing. If you want to be guilty of asscosiation, that's your problem. But SpellJammer, and a host of other people who still have a soul, would rather see justice served. Capital punishment isn't pretty, nice, or full of yummy gumdrops, then again what they did to get in the position there at wasn't nice and full of gumdrops neither.

[b]Responsibility. A lesson all liberals need to learn.. [/B]

You do not know the differance between justice and revenge. When you recognise the differance come back and make an arguemnt.

Justice. A term you need to learn

Originally posted by soleran30
Well I found nothing witty about that statement I wrote just the facts......

Anyway you never prove anything you say as its just a personal belief system and not justifiable by anything other than your little part of the world (namely your head) So like it or not if you don't have a solution for the death penalty why do you keep yammering on about it.....

But but everyone does what they want cuz its their choice and its none of your business, ok yes I summed up what you have said over and over again.........So back on topic the Death penalty serves a purpose and it is implemented all over the world and it can get ugly in countries out of the US like you cannot defend yourself you are just guilty.

Stop being bitter about the drugs thread, you did try. You did....you did goooood.

What do you mean I never prove anything? You shutting your eyes and going "Lalalalala not listening" doesn't equate to me not proving shit. Sorry to drop the T-bomb on you there but it's true. I'm entitled to talk about the death penalty, solution or not. Life sentances being life sentences are a solution.

Thirdly, let's see what you said earlier:

Originally posted by soleran30
Yes but the difference is that when you are "free" to make your own choices and you actively kill someone for whatever reason you have now lost your freedom to make further choices

Again, says who? You? Who are you? Some random dude.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Stop being bitter about the drugs thread, you did try. You did....you did goooood.

What do you mean I never prove anything? You shutting your eyes and going "Lalalalala not listening" doesn't equate to me not proving shit. Sorry to drop the T-bomb on you there but it's true. I'm entitled to talk about the death penalty, solution or not. Life sentances being life sentences are a solution.

Thirdly, let's see what you said earlier:

Again, says who? You? Who are you? Some random dude.

-AC

LOL I am anything but bitter actually I reread some of your threads and the way you attack people by putting them down you should publish some of your works because if so many people who disagree with you are retarded, foolish, stupid then you should have a tremendous book if anyone can understand your higher intelligence.

Sentancing someone to life in jail is your opinion and I am glad you live in the UK so your opinion doesn't matter for beans in the USA for rules where I live. So anyway I don't feel life in prison is a viable solution for blatant offenders to leech away at society paying for them all the time.

Originally posted by soleran30
LOL I am anything but bitter actually I reread some of your threads and the way you attack people by putting them down you should publish some of your works because if so many people who disagree with you are retarded, foolish, stupid then you should have a tremendous book if anyone can understand your higher intelligence.

Oh come on man. At least use something other than the "YOU ATTACK PEOPLE!" schtick. Everyone uses that. Calling me abusive is the new hating Bush. Except undeserved.

Originally posted by soleran30
Sentancing someone to life in jail is your opinion and I am glad you live in the UK so your opinion doesn't matter for beans in the USA for rules where I live. So anyway I don't feel life in prison is a viable solution for blatant offenders to leech away at society paying for them all the time.

So murder is ok? Despite it being the reason they're deemed worthless anyway?

A hypocrite isn't an animal in Africa.

-AC

LOL well who are you to decide the rules just some random guy? Thats your piece anyway........I am glad you don't agree with the justice system just don't break any laws and you won't have to see how it works for yourself......

Aside from that like I said when you kill someone you forfeit your rights in my opinion.......sociopath go look it up

Of course we could just let them do all the work put them in a crowded jail with like inmates and let the carnage ensue.

Originally posted by soleran30
LOL well who are you to decide the rules just some random guy? Thats your piece anyway........I am glad you don't agree with the justice system just don't break any laws and you won't have to see how it works for yourself......

Exactly. Who am I to decide that someone should be "officially" killed? No one.

Originally posted by soleran30
Aside from that like I said when you kill someone you forfeit your rights in my opinion.......sociopath go look it up

So because you believe that, the murderer officially deserves to be killed despite it being an extremely barbaric, hypocritical and un-needed process?

Originally posted by soleran30
Of course we could just let them do all the work put them in a crowded jail with like inmates and let the carnage ensue.

What would be the problem there though? By your rationale it wouldn't matter. Unless of course you want the death penalty for self-satisfaction of knowing a murderer had been killed...which would....render your whole stance on justice irrelevant.

-AC

Again AC, a major ass-hole to everybody he comes across.

Yet magickaly we're suppose to agree with him on mercy towards drug dealers, serial killers, and rapists? SpellJammer thinks the only reason you care about them is cause they're your heroes and you could only make it to subpar jerkface..

This isn't about mercy towards another human being.
It's about cause and effect. Someone has to be heald accountible.

Your entertainment value aside, it's becoming boring. Shouldn't you be rallying the anti-AC army somewhere?

Secondly, that second part is a chunk of lies and bs. Never have I said such things. I've never asked you to agree with me on anything and I've certainly never justified rape or murder. Why are you sitting there telling me that my heroes are rapists and breaking out the insults? Irony is that nobody will say "Hey, now you're attacking AC because he puts you away everytime you chime in." Which I do. Because you're a very stupid, illiterate moron. I'm curious as to why you continue despite admitting defeat.

Someone has to be held accountable? Who are you to do the holding? Or to decide that? Nobody.

-AC

SpellJammer has every right, what part of we are one do you not understand?

When you get a zit, you pop out the head and put clerasel on it.

Criminals are the zit.
Justice is the clearasel.

You have a responsibility to yourself, to do something about other people. Because you're one and the same.

Once you get over that ignorant sense of "I". All things will become clear..

Originally posted by Spelljammer
SpellJammer has every right, what part of we are one do you not understand?

Difference is, that's your opinion. Here in factville, you're not one with me. I'm me, you're you. You're not responsible for me, I'm not responsible for anyone else. If you choose to take on some moral obligation that isn't actually yours, then that's fine. Don't try pretending we all have it.

Originally posted by Spelljammer
When you get a zit, you pop out the head and put clerasel on it.

Criminals are the zit.
Justice is the clearasel.

You know, they say bursting spots spreads the spots.

Originally posted by Spelljammer
You have a responsibility to yourself, to do something about other people. Because you're one and the same.

Once you get over that ignorant sense of "I". All things will become clear..

No I don't, I am responsible for me. No one else. Same goes for you. You're not at fault if I commit murder, or if someone in Japan rapes a woman.

Stop being a cretin.

-AC

Then who are you to try and stop SpellJammer from infringing someone else's rights? It's not your problem, you only have responsibility to you correct? So infringing on SpellJammer's right to infringe on other's rights is still infringing.

Liberal Nasal Voice: Sounds pretty hyporcritical..

A friend of mine who lives up in New York gave me a Candiria CD a few years back. They're alright.

Originally posted by Spelljammer
Then who are you to try and stop SpellJammer from infringing someone else's rights? It's not your problem, you only have responsibility to you correct? So infringing on SpellJammer's right to infringe on other's rights is still infringing.

I'm telling you that it's wrong, because it is. I'm telling you that you've got no right to infringe on other peoples rights, because you don't. That's the kicker. You have no right to influence and infringe that which doesn't concern or have anything to do with you.

AKA Everyone else and their issues.

"But it becomes my..." No, it doesn't.

Botankus: What album? 300 Percent Density? You should check out their others. They're excellent.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
"But it becomes my..." No, it doesn't.
-AC

Funny......

Although Spelljammer got a point ....if you actually tell him not to infringe on others rights you kind of are hypocritical...now if you are just saying you find it wrong....that's ok.

OK....OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!!!!

Originally posted by Bardock42
Funny......

Although Spelljammer got a point ....if you actually tell him not to infringe on others rights you kind of are hypocritical...now if you are just saying you find it wrong....that's ok.

I'm not. Infringing on other people's freedom because of a moral obligation that you PERSONALLY CHOOSE to believe and uphold, is actually wrong. It's not a matter of "I choose to infringe. That's my right." It's not. You do not have the right to involve yourself in my life, a random person's life or anyone's life but your own.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm not. Infringing on other people's freedom because of a moral obligation that you PERSONALLY CHOOSE to believe and uphold, is actually wrong. It's not a matter of "I choose to infringe. That's my right." It's not. You do not have the right to involve yourself in my life, a random person's life or anyone's life but your own.

-AC

hmm then i disagree with you..I personally believe a person has to do whatever they want.....even support the death penalty......I dont believe there is any eternal morality that could forbid it....

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm not. Infringing on other people's freedom because of a moral obligation that you PERSONALLY CHOOSE to believe and uphold, is actually wrong. It's not a matter of "I choose to infringe. That's my right." It's not. You do not have the right to involve yourself in my life, a random person's life or anyone's life but your own.

I'm telling you that it's wrong, because it is. I'm telling you that you've got no right to infringe on other peoples rights, because you don't. That's the kicker. You have no right to influence and infringe that which doesn't concern or have anything to do with you.-AC

HAHA well its good you always make me laugh.......Just so you know its not ME holding you responsible its "Johnny Law" like it or not I don't care.......I just state my viewpoints.

At this point it looks like you are infringing on my right telling me what I can and cannot do this hypocracy runs deep.

So anyway let Jail justice do its work take all the sociopaths and stick them in alcatraz to double its capacity and let them do the work for us.