Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
The Ancient Sith created them(maybe mutated something else, maybe made them from scratch) to use as war mounts. They were gone for thousands of years until one was found somewhere and Kyp went to go kill it. Where's the continuty problem?
naga sadow could have created the tarentatek on yavin 4(where sadow conducted numerous experiments and created numerous dark creatures).
exar kun destroys "giant monster" with the power of the sith amulet that is given to him by freedon nadd.
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
What do Tarentatek's have to do with this?
you wrote this, my friend:
"The Ancient Sith created them(maybe mutated something else, maybe made them from scratch) to use as war mounts. They were gone for thousands of years until one was found somewhere and Kyp went to go kill it. Where's the continuty problem?"
I said that we can't compare lightsaber fights from OT to PT, not that we can't used movie canon.
You said we can't use movie fight scenes as evidence because they are in your opinion "too inconsistant". This totally rolls over and cocks the idea of movei canon being the highest level canon. If you can't use it as evidence, nothing else can be used either. The entire EU is branched off of the movies, not the other way around.
You basically made the mother of all **** ups trying to prove your case for Luke and it bit you in the ass. Admit this and move on.
Janus, go read his post in the "which character" thread in the EU section.
I did. I have also seen you make some pretty outlandish claims over the last few months, too. But you sure go out of your way to bash anyone you have a week's seniority over, whether they deserve it or not.
BTW, that was a mean sig you made.
No, it was hilarious. I couldn't believe you tried to argue against movie canon, so I had to make a sig to remind myself that it really happened.