srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Basically, the only real point of contention between Batman and Captain America is Batman being more skilled in the eyes of his supporters (who generally concede that Steve is physically on another level).And upon closer inspection, it's extremely debatable.
It's an undeniably absurd notion, and I have no idea why it seems to have taken hold.
Almost no one would have any hesitation in admitting that Shiva, Dragon or BT are more skilled than Batman, if only marginally so. It's well established that those characters are above Bruce in terms of martial prowess. Conservatively speaking Shang-Chi is on par with those three (he's actually significantly better... but lest pretend he is merely their equal), and in the Marvel U Captain America is established as being more skilled than Shang-Chi. Shang-Chi's villains have said it, Shang-Chi has confirmed it, and Captain America has proven it. Caps also stated he is better than Iron Fist. When DC firmly establishes that Batman is more skilled than Shiva, Dragon or BT, and doesn't have Batman's closest friends and allies walking around and suggesting or in some cases out right stating that likes of Black Cannary or Connor Hawke are more skilled than Bruce is, then we can start to talk about Batman being on par with Steve Rogers. Captain America is stronger, faster and more skilled than Batman. Captain America is more skilled than Batman... he is more skilled than several characters who are themselves more skilled than Batman. That's it.
Captain America would rag doll Batman just like Slade and Azrael have. This really should have been a short thread, there is no excuse for believing Batman can win.