Originally posted by abhilegend
Nope. Feats are only usable as a general estimation of the character. Fights are what matters most. We can compare them and you would find that batman can compete with steve in virtually every category.
Only DC vs Marvel was fan voted. I would also like to point out the fact that it was considered canon at that point and none of the fights were as terrible as people make them out to be.
What makes you think I'm not counting fights. To me a fight is a feat as well. Now direct comparison feats to me are more important then single isolated feats. Some fights in that voted contest were terrible like Lobo vs Wolverine and some would say Storm vs WonderWoman.
Feats including fight feats. Cap abilities just look that much better then Bruce irregardless if its a stat feat or a fight feat.
Its almost like marvel fanboys know better than the writer who have actually wrote these two characters. I'd like to think that John Byrne, PAD and Kurt Busiek's opinion matter more than random internet poster #one billion.
Plus its not like that fight were Bruce won had the same circumstances of this scenario anyways. And plus it was a voted contest, decided by fans anyways, not the writers.
This scenario is a fight with "no" weapons and in a octagon. It be illogical to assume Bruce can win this other then maybe 2/10. This more amounts to how much Steve holds back.