Originally posted by Blue nocturne
no, it destroys your logic, how can a comparison between two species be similar to a comparison of individuals of the same species?
You are lecturing me on logic? Miss "If I lived like an eskimo I'd know what it's like to actually be one."? Funny.
How can you compare? Because it's not the subject matter that is important, it's the idea. You, in a defeated haze, overlook that.
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
If two eskimo's lived two diffrent lives, by your logic they could understand each others lives.
They would both know what it's like to be born an eskimo, yes. What it's like to be an eskimo. Not what it's like living in different conditions, but that's irrelevant.
They would both know what it's like to be an actual eskimo. You wouldn't, unless you were born one.
You skipped a lot of my post, like the part where I proved that no matter how well you replicate something, you are never going to be IT. You will always be a replica. Same with studying black Americans. You will never be one, nor will you know what it's like to be, unless you are one.
How many more times? At least give me a number so I can say it in one post.
-AC