Anakin and Luke Skywalker(ROTS&ROTJ) Vs Darth Malak

Started by Darth Traya17 pages

Is this even a fight? You're pitting a Sith Lord of rather notable combat reputation versus a person who displayed the lightsabre skills of a slug and another person who's rather promising skills were brought down a notch by Obi-Wan Kenobi.

Malak WTFpwns these two...

Originally posted by Wesker
Concerning the movies, GL is the highest canon, Glentract.

G-canon is absolute canon; the movies and anything coming directly from George Lucas (including unpublished production notes from him or his production department that are never seen by the public). Elements coming directly from Lucas in the movie novelizations, reference books, and other sources are also G-canon, though anything created by the authors of those sources is C-canon (see below).

When the matter of changes between movie versions is brought up, the remastered editions are deemed superior to the theatrical ones, since they correct mistakes and 'improve' consistency between the two trilogies. They also express Lucas' "original" intention and also final word

You attempting to overrule Gl concerning the movies is moot. Nice try, fanboy.

Of course that means that R2-D2 is the most powerful ever, Lucas says so

"He doesn't need any special powers. He's already the most powerful person on the screen there. R2-D2 is the hero." R2-D2 pwns.

Haha, nice pics Janus.

Originally posted by Wesker
Concerning the movies, GL is the highest canon, Glentract.

G-canon is absolute canon; the movies and anything coming directly from George Lucas (including unpublished production notes from him or his production department that are never seen by the public). Elements coming directly from Lucas in the movie novelizations, reference books, and other sources are also G-canon, though anything created by the authors of those sources is C-canon (see below).

When the matter of changes between movie versions is brought up, the remastered editions are deemed superior to the theatrical ones, since they correct mistakes and 'improve' consistency between the two trilogies. They also express Lucas' "original" intention and also final word

You attempting to overrule Gl concerning the movies is moot. Nice try, fanboy.

Where exactly does it say that GL is a higher level of canon then the movies?

Considering that Lucas created the work, he can do what the **** he wants with it.

It's common sense.

The fact that the movies are retconned to fit GL's "intention" means that he is indeed, the force behind them. For movies, GL is ultimate canon. The fact that you are arguing this means you are the biggest fanboy I have ever seen. You make Lightsnake look like an amateur.

Originally posted by Wesker
The fact that the movies are retconned to fit GL's "intention" means that he is indeed, the force behind them. For movies, GL is ultimate canon. The fact that you are arguing this means you are the biggest fanboy I have ever seen. You make Lightsnake look like an amateur.

How does the show that GL is a higher level source then the movies? If we take GL as the ultimate level of canon, then you always calling OT Vader weak makes no sense as he is 80% of strong as Sidious. It also makes Luke far beyond AOTC Anakin, or perhaps even ROTS Anakin(which even I would not claim) unless you can somehow show that Anakin as of AOTC is greater then 80% of Vader. If me calling GL less canonical then the movies makes me a fanboy, then you are too as you have done it more times then me. I guess we can just be brothers in total fanboyism, eh?

I still have yet to see any quotes that make Luke > AOTC Anakin, Glentract. Once you provide those, I'll entertain them. In the meantime, in absence of GL's word on the issue itself, the movie is used since it resembles his intent. AOTC Anakin is VERY skilled, very expereinced, and has higher force potential than Luke, period.

Originally posted by Wesker
I still have yet to see any quotes that make Luke > AOTC Anakin, Glentract. Once you provide those, I'll entertain them. In the meantime, in absence of GL's word on the issue itself, the movie is used since it resembles his intent. AOTC Anakin is VERY skilled, very expereinced, and has higher force potential than Luke, period.

OT Vader = 80% of Sidious. Source: Lucas
Luke > OT Vader. Source: Return of the Jedi

So unless you think AOTC Anakin is more than 80% of Sidious...

Originally posted by Wesker
I still have yet to see any quotes that make Luke > AOTC Anakin, Glentract. Once you provide those, I'll entertain them. In the meantime, in absence of GL's word on the issue itself, the movie is used since it resembles his intent. AOTC Anakin is VERY skilled, very expereinced, and has higher force potential than Luke, period.

Lets look at it this way. Luke beats Vader. Vader is 80% as powerful as Sidious. If Luke was 10% as strong as Vader, he would not have been able to overpower him. Hence, Luke pwns AOTC Anakin assuming we go only guy GL 's word.

Omg...

Glentract, do you really have trouble admitting that the final battle was conflicted? Did you really see Vader so much as fight back while Luke was just hitting at him? Apparently the symbolism and the meaning behind the fight is lost to you. Right. Whatever. So if Yoda had a son and Yoda's son killed him because Yoda didn't want to kill his son and convert him back to the light side, Yoda's son > anyone Yoda beat? Ridiculous. Obviously the idea of a plot device is beyond you.

And obviously you think Vader let Luke cut his arm off.

I don't see any reason why he'd hold back. It's fake and replaceable.

Originally posted by Wesker
I don't see any reason why he'd hold back. It's fake and replaceable.

If he didn't hold back then you agree that Luke wonn fair and square.

Originally posted by darthsith19
If he didn't hold back then you agree that Luke wonn fair and square.

Uhh... reading comprehension?

Get some.

Here's a question. Why would Malak win? All we have seen of his saber skill is what was in the game which really doesn't show us much. He never shown powers that are really impressive. He seems to be overrated a lot (along with Revan). I want someone to prove me that Malak is this great warrior. After replaying KoToR I it seems that Luke(RotJ) and Anakin(RotS) could take him.

Self-Ownage.

Erm, no.

Malak seemed to have great enough skill to first own Luke in less than five seconds, then take on 'teh ch0s3n 1!!!!!!!!!!!111'

Uhh... reading comprehension?

Wesket said Vader wasn't trying, and then he said there's nor eason why Vader'd hold back. Read his posts.

He meant that Luke wasn't holding back...