IKC:
I refuse to read either of those piles of festering excrement.
And good job, you read... some of them.
My source for NJO and DN? I'll just use you. Try proving up.
And I will use you as my source for all things TOTJ. There, I have you as a source and you have me. Don’t try that pathetic excuse about my limited access to the comics again.
Beside the fact that it does contradict EU (no kaiburr crystal to be found, etc), it contradicts G-Canon (Luke vs. Vader, Luke mysteriously sucking ass at telekinesis).
SotME is not canon. QED.
You have not stated any actual instances when Luke used this telekinesis that was to powerful. Why not?
The Kaiburr crystal and Luke beating Vader I have already explained. If you aren’t going to listen to those, then you are just being ignorant.
GFGI
?
Scroll a few pages up. I'm not going to waste my time getting it myself just to have you in your all-knowing 14 year old wisdom deny it again.
Attacking my age can be taken as a sign of desperation, you know.
And you didn’t prove that it’s not canon. But, I’m not going to ask you to do that. Instead just provide a few contradictions between TOTJ and the Guides.
I already told you, he's able to use telekinesis to a far greater degree of competence than he shows in ESB.
And specifis occurrences of this?
Except that the chronology cannot create canon. It needs primary source material behind it and it cannot contradict this source material. Ergo, it's barely even C-Canon.
Why can’t the guide create canon? It doesn’t contradict anything in anyway when it does so.
Lol! I just showed you to be talking out your ass and this is your response?
Typical.
Still trying to make yourself feel better? Well, I won’t stop you, you probably need it.
Have you read anything I've posted? I never argued that all of it was wrong, for what must be the dozenth time. The elements that I've mentioned, among others, are though.
You said that it’s description of DE Sidous is wrong. How so?
Except they frequently do contradict the primary source material. Type some stuff on Kun and I'll point it out.
"Chronolgy is to the C-canon as an encyclopedia is to Julius Caesar's life recorded by peers." - Janus
I want a specifis instance when it contradicted the comics. You saying that it has isn’t a specific instance. Please provide one.
And the Guides are like an encyclopedia of Julius Caesar’s life assuming you went and talked to Julius himself when writing them.
Says the boy who just got made to look like an ass with his bullshit "zOMG, LUCASBOOKS SEAL = G-CANON" nonsense.
How you doing with that Lucasbooks seal on TOTJ, by the way? Still sting, does it?
No, actually it didn’t to begin with because only some of the comics have the seal on them. The fact that you have to mark pathetic remarks like the one you just did really show that if you can’t get a 14 year old kid to believe you, you suddenly lose any sense of security you may have once held.
You need to learn to read. Hyperbolic descriptions of DE Luke and Sidious' power have been retconned by the existence of more powerful beings in TOTJ. Considering Sidious' use of Force Storm is a technique described as an ability derived from the Ancient Sith... he isn't more powerful than them.
So there you go.
1. Did I say that Sidious is greater then the Ancient Sith? No, I didn’t. Maybe you sohuld practice what you preach and work on your own reading comprehension.
2. What are these hyperbolic descriptions of Luke and Sidous’ power? Word for word, please.
3. Just because Sidious got a technique from the Ancient Sith doesn’t mean he can’t use it to a fuller extent. Show one instance of any Sith Lord knowing Force Storm better then Sidious.
And by your ‘logic’, Exar Kun can’t be stronger then Vodo as most of his force powers are derived from Vodo. See the fallacy? If not, I’ll be happy to explain it to you.
Read up. I already have.
Really, when exactly did you do so? How many post would I need to count back?
Obi-Wan's quote proved that he did. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
So since Obi-Wan is never shown taking a shit in the movies, does that mean he doesn't?
Anakin and Lars never talked since before the Clone Wars started. How would Lars have not wanted him to fight?
I already told you. Sidious never uses anything that the Ancient Sith haven't invented. He never is shown to have used Sith magic, nor is he shown to invent artifacts as they did. The definitive quotes related to their power overrule the subjective, hyperbolic ones about Sidious'.
You still have not provided these hyperbolic quotes. Please hurry and do so.
And as I already told you, just because earlier people came up with a technique first it doesn’t mean that people later down the road couldn’t have come up with a better one.
And seeing as Sidious draws energy from an entire planet full of people...well, I think he had enough power for his goals, amulets or not.
No, we don't. We have no ****ing idea who it was and we didn't even know when DE was written.
1991. Good thing you know what you are talking about. How do you know that it wasn’t Ragnos? You have your out-of-universe evidence, but you need in-universe evidence.
Occam's razor, assume the negative unless there's proof to the positive.
Ragnos was the strongest Sith that the Ancients had ever produced. That is made quite clear. So Ragnos' opinion is the one that weighs the most when it comes to matters of power. He crowns Kun with his former title.
You still need to prove that it wasn’t Ragnos Sidous was talking to, or at least provide a likely alternative with proof supporting that alternative. Why wouldn’t it be Ragnos? We know he was still around even after DE?
No, it only proves that I asked you to provide context.
So, how about you quantify his power rather than spouting off a bunch of hyperbolic bullshit? How powerful are Killiks? Did he draw power from all of them? How much power would this be?
And don't give me bullshit about calories
Go read my stuff at EoD. I answered it all in detail there.
Most of the time, yeah.
Oh, come now, that’s not good enough and you know it. Provide actual reasons.
Because the narration decrees that they sacrificed themselves to power the ritual that would release his spirit. There is no proof that their power went to Exar's spirit.
Why couldn’t Exar just stab his lightsaber through his head? That would have killed him too. Your ‘evidence’ isn’t conclusive.
Feat wars are a logical fallacy. Pwning Vodo with the ease Kun did is a better feat even by those low standards.
Answered in detail at EoD.
Thrawn is declared wrong by the PT, hyperspace is invariably same-day travel.
Source?
You and Fishy are proven wrong by Janus' excellent contributions. The Senate building holds a monstrous amount of beings. Kun's feat is in the bag.
No, we aren’t. I don’t know where you got off on that. Look at the Senate Chamber in ROTS; when the Senate was much larger, and you will see that it could not possibly hold a million beings.
Nice try degrading Kun's accomplishment. Sorry, fanboy. Vodo would wipe his ass with Luke, too.
Proof?
LOL! Okay. Prove how Luke's going to block something he's never heard of, seen, or even imagined existed.
How do you know Luke doesn’t know of it? Luke had access to large amounts of knowledge of Ossus. Oh, and what if Luke uses his green sparks thing on Exar? Exar’s never seen that. I guess Exar automatically can’t block it.
Okay.
Kun curbstomps. Quod erat demonstrandum.
Still unproven.
You apparently think that's the end-all-be-all of my argument. Read the entire thread next time, that's just the most sure way Kun has to kill Luke.
He could easily tear him apart in a lightsaber duel, or a duel of the Force as well.
Totally unsupported IKC. Prove that Kun would defeat Luke in either a lightsaber duel or a duel of the force.
This is the main thrust: Luke has no edge on Kun in any facet of personal combat. Kun is his superior in every way in that regard.
Totally unsupported, IKC. Prove your statement. Seriously, this is as bad as almost anything Lightsnake wrote.
No, emerald lightning only stuns its victim. Jacen then hacked the Vong up while it was stunned.
How the ****, by the way, would lightning beat those beams? I see them dissipating as Kun's beam comes crashing at Luke. Luke begins wetting his pants a millisecond before he's vaporized.
If Kun is stunned, then Luke just has to walk over and dice him with his lightsaber. It’s a non-lethal instakill. It makes sense that Luke wouldn’t have it kill on contact, as that wouldn’t be a Jedi thing to do.
And how do you know that those beams are more powerful then Luke’s lightning? Any proof?
Seeing as Luke has faced down force storms that can destroy capital ships before(when he wasn’t nearly as strong as he is in DN) why do you think that Exar’s beams with be any different?