Darth_Glentract
The Truest Sith Lord
Originally posted by IKC
Glentract, have you read all of TOTJ?
Good job dodging the question. Answer it in your next post with a 'yes' or 'no' question, please.
I, unlike you, will answer you question the first time you ask. I have read parts of it. I also have the Essentail Guides, which even if they aren't a higher level of canon then the comics themselves(even though I do not believe they are a lower level) have not been shown to contradict the actual comics in any way. I would sure like to see your source that is official on the NJO and Dark Nest.
Originally posted by IKC
Nice condescension from a 14 year old, Glentract. I own the book and have read it; can you say as much?
Yes, the book has been owned by one person or another in my family for over 20 years. I have read it twice, actually, but the second time I read it was almost five years ago.
And even though I haven't read the book in years, I at least know the backround on the things in the book. Those things you called inconsistentcies really are not inconsistent with the rest of EU as I have shown several post ago. If you would, take the time to read and think about my answers, and then once again you should try to prove that the book is uncanon.
Originally posted by IKC
Except Obi-Wan mysteriously is unable to do so in ESB. He even states that he's unable to. Contradicted by the movies, not canon. QED.
Where did Obi-wan state that he was unable to do so? And did you ever think about the fact that Obi-wan's spirit was far older and weaker then it was in ESB?
Why do you always type 'QED' at the end of certain paragraphs?
Originally posted by IKC
lol. Prove up, where is this stated? Do I have to prove to you that the Chronology cannot create canon, again?
When you prove that the Chronology isn't canon the first time, then you can do so again. It's stated on page 117, lines 3-5 in the NEGtC.
Originally posted by IKC
He's able to use telekinesis with a fair degree of competence.
Specifics? I want actual instances of this, not, "bUt lukee use teh forcE!!1"/
Originally posted by IKC
Jesus, Glentract. I just proved to you that the guides are not canon because they do not come from his movie production department. G-Canon is anything that comes from Lucas. The guides did not come from Lucas. Ergo, the guides are not G-Canon, much less any other kind of canon.I like how you conveniently ignored that I showed how absurd your logic is with my Lucasarts example.
I already stated that they aren't G-canon, but the next level down, just like the books and comics. And for what must be the tenth time, if the guides don't contradict the comics to begin with, what does it matter if one is higher then the other, the state the same thing.
Originally posted by IKC
lol!Glentract, guess what? That was a scan of the compilation book. That one has all of DLotS in it. According to your fanboy logic, that makes TOTJ G-Canon.
Good thing for you that I don't subscribe to that bullshit "logic."
You're just being pathetic. Why don't you try getting some sleep.
Originally posted by IKC
And then I quoted Lightsnake stating the same things you just stated. Good job, buddy.
Still waiting for an actual response.
Originally posted by IKC
Did you... read the quote?
Have you read any of what I have said? Just because one small part is wrong, that doesn't mean the entire thing is wrong.
Originally posted by IKC
Because the Chronology is not and can not create canon, your point collapses. The Chronology cannot, as well, contradict the primary source material they derive their information from, or else the primary source takes precedence over the guide.
You made a horrible assumption.
The guides don't contradict the comics.
Originally posted by IKC
Says the boy who thinks he can dictate what is canon.
I'm the one who thinks I can dictate canon? I think you should take a look in the mirror, buddy.
Originally posted by IKC
TOTJ is not hyperbolic, for one. It makes several objective statements: Marka Ragnos, for example, is the (definitive) most powerful of the (again, definitive) most powerful.But because DE describes DE Luke and Sidious as godlike beings, etc etc, and later those two are put into context with the people of TOTJ (because TOTJ was written later) their descriptions are retconned.
How does it retcon is? Is having the ability to destroy capital ships with the force weaker then what the Ancient Sith did? If so, how? What exactly makes them weaker?
Originally posted by IKC
And if you had read the book, you'd see that they did.
I still want you to describe them. Go ahead, do it.
Originally posted by IKC
First of all, your analogy is flawed since absence of proof is not proof of absence. Lars could easily have told Obi-Wan that as, for example, Obi-Wan is handing off Luke.
You still have to prove that he did.
Originally posted by IKC
And I never said the entire comic was false, you do have a reading comprehension problem. I stated that many of the descriptions of power were made false and Sidious' meetings with Sith spirits were called into question because it was written at a time when the Sith were only supposed to have existed two thousand rather than five thousand BBY.
You haven't showed how these descriptions are false. All you have done is said they are flase and then say they are retconned by later sources. That, although it might sound like proof, is not proof. An actual occurence would be proof.
And since the Sith Empire being 2000 years old has been retconned, then we now know who he was really talking to, don't we?
Originally posted by IKC
But you do not know that all of them "liked" Sidious, and you do not know that Ragnos himself liked Sidious, [B]because Ragnos did not yet exist. [/B]
Ragnos not existing is retconned. And even if not every Sith liked Sidious, is that any different then with Kun? I seem to remember Nadd not esactly liking him.
Originally posted by IKC
See above.
Ditto.
Originally posted by IKC
I just told you. One of them was Exar and Ulic's amulets meeting. That is made very clear at the end of DLotS.
I don't remember that. Can you provide a passage or quote or somethingt? It seemed to me that him being there was what made the amulets act like they did. I think we have a false cause and effect on your part here.
Originally posted by IKC
Except you have no proof that he lorded over those who were already dead, nor do you have any proof that spirits can harm one another. You assume that since he lords over the living then he must lord over the dead, but this assumption begs for proof. So prove up.
What would make spirits unable to harm other spirits?
If Ragnos wasn't the top dog of the spirits, then what does Ragnos liking him prove? It's not like there were many other capable Sith for him to pick from.
Originally posted by IKC
How about you provide some context? I remember your bullshit about "zOMG, Kyp killed teh leviathan!!1!1!ONE"
This just goes to prove that you really don't know jack about Luke at this point. The person I am referring to is Raynar Thul, who drew power from the Killik nests. The Killiks inhabited approximately 375 nest before the end of Dark Nest. Now, it doesn't appear the he drew as much power from each individual as Sidous did, but he did have a far larger base of power to draw from, making him far more powerful then DE Sidous.
Originally posted by IKC
This is another Lightsnake argument.There is no proof that Exar got jack shit from the massassi. We only know that their sacrifices were needed for the ritual to free his spirit to take place.
And just because it is something that Lightsnake said it is wrong?
Try and answer this, why would all of the Massassi die if Exar didn't draw power from them?
Originally posted by IKC
Feat wars are a logical fallacy. Provide some convincing context and then show how he'd beat Kun, who likely has much greater lightsaber skill than Luke.
Oh yes, "who likely has greater saber skills" is a great argument. Here's all the argument I need, Luke pwned Raynar.
continued in next post.