Babe Ruth the true homerun king

Started by forumcrew6 pages

your argument is BAD. Ruth hit 59 home runs in 1921 and 60 in 1927 both of these were 154 game season. That would be 8 less than marris, McGwire, and Bonds played (162) That means Bonds hit 13 more home runs in only 8 more games.

This means Ruth was hitting 0.38 homeruns a game while Bonds was hitting 0.45 homeruns a game.
Also Bonds only played 153 games the year he hit 73, he also walked 40 mor times than Ruth and Ruth had 64 MORE at bats than bonds did.

Marrris may have hit his 61'st the last game of the regular season, but Ruth hit his 60th in the playoffs so i see it as fair game

(if you wanna bring up anything NFL related go for it, but do it in the NFL thread)

Mr Parker I think Forumcrew has got you beat, and why would you bring in previous posts as some kind of "dirt" you have on him. It was his oponion don't bring that up when you are loosing this argument

FOH

hank aaron is the TRUTH!

Last I checked, steroids don't improve your timing or how you see the ball, and as an FYI, McGwire, in his rookie year, fresh off the USA baseball team, he had 48 HR's, which was the most by a rookie.

But, of course, he was probably on those hand/eye coordinating steroids back then, too.

Damn hand eye coordinating steroids......

Originally posted by PINBALL
Mr Parker I think Forumcrew has got you beat, and why would you bring in previous posts as some kind of "dirt" you have on him. It was his oponion don't bring that up when you are loosing this argument

I admit those are good points and I can concede that Maris was fair game because of those points made but I still say the Babe has Bonds beat in homers in a season since Bonds was a steroid freak and whats your obsession with Bonds Forumcrew?why are you not talking about Mcguire as well when he did it? either way,those guys will always have an asterisk next to them now that it has been learned they were indeed taking steriods back then.I only bring up that point he made back then because I stopped taking him serious in his posts after he put his foot in his mouth back then. 😄 However I must say,nice to see you think more rational in your posts about baseball than you do about football forumcrew. 😄 you make much better points when it comes to baseball than football. 😄

Originally posted by P, that Dude
FOH

hank aaron is the TRUTH!

damn right.even if Bonds breaks his record this year,Aaron is still the true all time home run king.Bonds should have been barred from the game before the year began.

I'd like to mention this point. To my knowledge bonds has no real evidence against him. All I know of is that people are accusing him, I think he did steroids, but the fact is there is no physical proof that he did in fact use steroids....

yea bonds has never been totaly proven of taking steriods, and i talk about him over McGuire because bonds out did Mcguire so why bother.

ps. once again im not gonna respond to your football comments unless you wanna bring it up in the NFL thread, which you obviously dont wanna discuss there because a) you will look like an idiot for bringing up a playoff prediciton from 2 years ago and b) its just pointless

^agree.....

Originally posted by forumcrew
yea bonds has never been totaly proven of taking steriods, and i talk about him over McGuire because bonds out did Mcguire so why bother.

ps. once again im not gonna respond to your football comments unless you wanna bring it up in the NFL thread, which you obviously dont wanna discuss there because a) you will look like an idiot for bringing up a playoff prediciton from 2 years ago and b) its just pointless

All Im saying is that you at least think rationally and at least make good points when making posts about baseball unlike you do with football which means i can at least take you serious in a discussion about baseball where I cant in a football discussion because you at least make good points in baseball discussions. but yeah it would be pretty pointless to bring that up in that thread since it happened so long ago-again this is why I dont take you serious in football discussions because it wasnt 2 years ago when that discussion took place,it was only just a little over a year ago,it was in january 2005 when that happened,this is only may 2006.LOL But hey,if you want me to,I'll go over there and bring it up for you again to show you how you put your foot in your mouth back then. 😄 Its your call if you want me to bring it up there again.I dont care one way or another.just make the request and I will be glad to bring it up again there if you like.

i meant 2 years going by seasons, if you wanna go bring it up there then do so, if not then dont, otherwise shutup please because your annoying everyone.

Mr. Parker your looking like a total ass, just in case you didn't already know..............

yeah whatever. 🙄 are you like forumcrews brother or something? Many people share my view about Bonds that an asterisk belongs next to his name.Just last sundays sports paper in my city carried one of those caption pictures with a pic of Bonds and all these flakes and things falling and it has Bonds saying-See people like me,look at all that confetti they are throwing. and there is a guy standing next to him saying-Thats not confetti you idiot,those are asterisks.

and oh,I will bring that point up on that thread tomorrow when i have more time. 😄

No I'm not really on either sides its just that you are talking about this whole stupid NFL thing and you can't accept others oponions thats why you an ASS....

your full of crap,either that or have a major reading problem because I have said at least twice to Forumcrew on this thread that he has made some good points quite a few times such as conceding to him that Maris broke Ruths record in that like he said it was fair game that he did so.yeah Thats really not accepting other peoples opinions all right. 🙄 Its time for me to put you on ignore because you obviously got some reading comprehension problems since I indeed in fact acknowledged to forumcrew by telling him many times that he made some good points and conceded those points to him.all I said was his posts in baseball are much more logical and thought out than they are in football and you like take it personal that I said to him his posts in football discussions are not very good like they are in baseball.Damn I have never seen someone take something so personal before such as yourself.you got problems dude besides your reading comprehension problems and definetely not worth my time anymore now or in the future. 😛

Go ahead and put me on your ignore list I honestly couldn't care, this means I won't have to ever have another discussion with you again. Also I may Misread things occasionally, but atleast I have proper grammer. I am also not an ass...

I guess you did not take me serious that I have you blocked from my view.how pitiful.

it appears steven wells was right

^???