Originally posted by Escape81
Rofl. Vious was arguing that Lucas's words aren't canon? Lololol.Sorry Vious. You've lost the debate. Why? You're arguing against canon.
How's this for a nice dose of 'canon', for you. In ANH, Luke was attracted to Leia, and clearly didn't like the idea of Han pursuing her. In ESB, when she kissed him (admitedly, it was to piss off Han), Luke was totally smug. If
anything Lucas says or does is canon (including the movies) then that can only mean that Lucas
intended for Luke to be attracted to Leia, something we in the Real World, like to call incest. If Lucas was to say something along the lines of "I'd've liked this to've gone on longer, but had to cut it for time." That does not mean that the existing movie is necessarily missing anything. It would only be ammended if a future version of the movie was released with additional scenes actually added into the original cut.
As for the debate, I have
not lost it, because Dooku did not beat Anakin
in a duel. I explained the basics of a duel before, did you not understand that? Was it too complicated for you to understand? Anakin was not a good enough swordsman to hit Dooku, he had to resort to physical methods, which meant they were no longer duelling.
Originally posted by Escape81
This comment above isn't going to be enough to secure a victory. Especially when your contemporary likes to argue against canon statements made by George Lucas. I've provided bounds of evidence. You've provided an opinion, and Vious wants to argue a duel. 'I couldn't care less if you like Dooku, or even if you worship him. But Lucas said that Anakin proved his power by killing Count Dooku. If you'd like, go read my word-for-word transcript of the commentary - and where I combine it with all the other evidence.
Count Dooku was beaten. You'll just have to accept it.
I fully accept that Dooku was beaten. You'll just have to accept that he was not
beaten in a duel.