Originally posted by Dinalfos
It counts, but there are so many different showings for different characters that it's impossibly hard to tell. At least in this case it is. Especially since Cap's on panel abilities strongly fluctuate.
which is why direct comparisons are important... the two characters get together nd build consistency off of one another.. spiderman consistently has problems with cap.. therefore cap gives spiderman problems.... cap's abilities don't fluctuate anymore than any other comic book character.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Ha, funny you should mention that, because Spidey's origin is among the most wildly critisized.
irrelivent.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Hell, even I believe it's beyond implausible.
so ligically it can't happen.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
But you know pretty damn well that even fantasy pieces are bound by logic, even if they have to create their own. Internal logic is one of the most important things in all forms of art, comics are not exempt from this.
EXACTLY.... so you DO understand the point but you don't want to accept it's consequences? hmmmm.
so your appeal to logic was for nothing since the only logic that works is this "internal logic" or comic logic.... thank you for conceding.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
It's not literally off, but the subject is more or less covered with the Bloodlust rule.
not really.. it's contradictory.. for instance.. the characters that can use bloodlust are to be bloodlusted in fights... this means characters like venom, wolverine, taskmaster.. they can be bloodlusted all they want cause they don't have a problem killing people.. but CIS isn't exempt from these debates... so if a character CAN be in bloodlust but it conflicts with their character's principles.. then they most likely won't be.. besides.. a bloodlusted spidey is basically a punching bag for gifted fighters.. daredevil proved that.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Pis is often subjective, but not int this case. At the best of his abilities, Cap would lose the fight.
actually it IS EXTREMELY subjective in this case.... otherswise we wouldn't be discussing the semantics of what counts in these threads and what doesn't.... 😬
But yes I agree cap would lose more often than not.. I DO however think he could secure 3 wins at best.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
🙄
😉
Originally posted by Dinalfos
One level is really quite a margin.
not really.. after all ghost rider and demonic hobgoblin are a level above spidey... spidey's still able to tag them like crazy...
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Even still, Spiderman obviously has his own fighting skills. IF you want to go by panels(which is good in this case), then you would also know that his skills are developed around his supernatural powers. I would say that it isn't a real skill, because it doesn't really take much training to perform the acrobatics and stuff. But it does take training and experience to create a deadly offensive cocktail out of them. And Spidey's got enough experience of his own.
I'm not denying that spidey has his own fighting style.. but it's not a honed and tempered one.. which is why gifted streeters give him fits... I'm not denying he has experience.. but his experience is "meat and potatoes" fighting.. not formal training... there's a reasons why spiderman conceded that cap know more about h2h then he would ever learn in 100 years...
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Also, his higher showings generally dwarf those of Captain America.
In strength perhaps.. but that's a given...
like soljer said.. caps been shown to be able to go toe to toe with too many characters at spidey's level and do fine to deny that he's around the same level as spidey.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Why is Hulk vs. Gladiator irrelevant? It's not. Anyway, it's funny.
it is irrelivent.. you didn't make a decent point using that feat... and this thread isn't about either character anyways.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Because Thing didn't have a problem with Wolverine on at least one occasion.
which is also irrelivent since that was due to the fact that wolverine was already messed which was even stated ON PANAL.. and again consistency.. one occasion does not denote a dozen other occasions where logan tears it up with thing or people on things level.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
Nor did Juggernaut. Doesn't sound very consistent to me.
juggernaught punches holes in demensional fabric.. he clobbered thing in 3 hits... juggernaughts on an entirely different level than most bricks.. bad example.. also.. only based off of ONE example.. again.. one example doesn't denote CONSISTANT examples.. i you want to use wolverine and play the brick game I've got over a dozen examples off the top of my head where logan does just fine with them.
Originally posted by Dinalfos
But let's say for argument's sake that it is, how would that qualify as reasonable?
it doesn't have to be for arguments sake it is consistant.... 😕
reason is again contingent on logic.. comic book logic says it's reasonable.. my personal opinion on the matter is irrelivent.