Freedon Nadd runs the gauntlet

Lesse....Knights of the Old Republic comic, Chronology....really, just about anything...yeah, those sources state the Beast Riders were formed after Nadd exiled them from Iziz...ever read the KOTOR comic where Nomi and Ulic forst appear?

I'm afraid Nai was wrong in this case as I've shown. I'm waiting for where the Jedi were sent, liar

Show me your quotes, show me your proof. Oh wait, you don't have any. As for me, I am reading the Freedon Nadd uprising as it was describing the beast riders. Nothing ever states that Nadd was killed by the beast riders, and my source is a wikipedia type sure, but it already shows more than your ridiculous assumption that "nadd was killed by the beast riders"

The NEC? Knights of the Old Republic? "Those exiled by Freedon Nadd learned how to tame the beasts and became the Beast Riders."
A bit rough from memory, but it's in the NEC, paraphrased from the section "The Shadow of Freedon Nadd."

Ohhhh, Wikipedia....which was misproven on the Wikipedia talk page, sorry liar!

And no, nothing states Nadd was killed by Beast Riders, I never said he was.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
The NEC? Knights of the Old Republic? "Those exiled by Freedon Nadd learned how to tame the beasts and became the Beast Riders."
A bit rough from memory, but it's in the NEC, paraphrased from the section "The Shadow of Freedon Nadd."

Ohhhh, Wikipedia....which was misproven on the Wikipedia talk page, sorry liar!

And no, nothing states Nadd was killed by Beast Riders, I never said he was.

Misproven, where? Oh wait, lets make some MORE shit up!

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Freedon_Nadd#Nadd.27s_Death

And it's later removed...coincidence?

Wow lightsnake, your grasp for logic, or lack thereof, is astounding. I have at least one source(whether canon or not) to possibly logically deduce facts from, while you have none.

Since I clearly cannot understand what either of you two are exactly arguing, I'll ask.

What exactly are you arguing about?

I don't recall, I stated that I don't understand why people claim Nadd wasn't powerful, when I think he was and there are a lot of facts that point to the same. Nai also gave examples as to how he was powerful even as a spirit. Lightsnake simply tried to refute that with nonsense.

The New Essential Chronology does says this exactly "One of the policies Nadd instituted was to banish criminals outside the walls of Iziz, where they would be devoured by the voracious predators. However, some of these exiles managed to band together and survive, even learning how to capture the beasts and domestitacte them."

Then it continues about how they further advanced, and all that. Now, from the actual source material (Tales of the Jedi):

That was Arca describing the basic history, and although he doesn't mention Nadd (he never says anything about him until the end of the comic anyways), he describes the history perfectly in conjunction with the NEC. Which would lead one to believe that the Beast Riders didn't come into existance until "one of Nadd's policies", therefore Nadd was there before them.

And Lightsnake, Nadd can affect the living:

He floored Vodo across an entire room, yes it said his "hatred lashed out at him", but how can that be if he is powerless?

He instakilled King Ommin, granted he was weak, but nonetheless effected him. He was able to pull Exar Kun's lightsaber away, too.

Ok gotcha, didn't know that part, as for Nadd being powerful, it is obvious. The only thing that isn't, is just how powerful he was.

There's nothing claiming Nadd was in a high tier whatsoever. Nothing except but some ghosty feats.

And it'll take more beyond 'easily triggering energy', killing dying old men and yanking away sabers to prove Nadd's so-called power.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
There's nothing claiming Nadd was in a high tier whatsoever. Nothing except but some ghosty feats.

And it'll take more beyond 'easily triggering energy', killing dying old men and yanking away sabers to prove Nadd's so-called power.

blah blah blah more excuses. Good thing Fact>Your opinion. Sama explained it, Nai explained it, I explained it. If you don't want to listen, your problem.

No, Nai tried arguing...you lied your ass off and failed to prove a thing.

Nadd's training was totally incomplete in both cases. Fact

Originally posted by Lightsnake
No, Nai tried arguing...you lied your ass off and failed to prove a thing.

Nadd's training was totally incomplete in both cases. Fact

No, Nai was correct, Sama was correct and I(even though I proved a quote from a non canon source so you can try learning to logially deduce arguments), also was correct. You on the other hand, are wrong yet again.

Really? So Freedon Nadd killed his master in combat?

You were correct even though you provided a quote from something totally falsified? You're a lying fool. Nadd killed his master because he wasn't allowed to be a Jedi and ran away...Nadd killed Sadow because Sadow wouldn't teach him true Sith secrets and this after he got Adas's holocron, when the gatekeeper can deny requests or even threaten the user.

Yelling the loudest means nothing. YOu failed to counter a thing, you lied, used false sources and have failed to show anything.

You lose.

**** off, troll

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Really? So Exar Kun killed his master in combat?

You were correct even though you provided a quote from something totally falsified? You're a lying fool. Nadd killed his master because he wasn't allowed to be a Jedi and ran away...Nadd killed Sadow because Sadow wouldn't teach him true Sith secrets and this after he got Adas's holocron, when the gatekeeper can deny requests or even threaten the user.

Yelling the loudest means nothing. YOu failed to counter a thing, you lied, used false sources and have failed to show anything.

You lose.

**** off, troll

Uh what? Kun did what? Oh wait, you have no argument. And no, the quote wasn't falsified, it probably isn't canon but by no means does that make it false. The only fool on this forum is you arguing with facts and playing stupid as usual. I have given proof, Sama has, so has Nai. And what does the incompetent lightsnake do? Sit on the forum and lies to himself. Oh yes, I forgot, anytime you're heated like an immature little shit, you start calling me a troll and acting in denial. Your attempts at debating are humorous. Moron. You lose yet again.

Freedon Nadd

Hah, what? "It's not canon and was never written but that doesn't make it not true!"

Perhaps you're confused: That quote doesn't exist. It's not canon, meaning it's 100 percent invalid. It was a made up quote with no source or backing, sorry!

Sorry, troll! Go away.

seriously you expect that calling someone 'troll' and names of the sort would only make him/her go "Oh yes sorry I'm a troll, sorry for bothering you I must leave now"? no2

Courtesy
Don't attack others. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack.

I'm sorry, I've tried doing that.

I doubt you can find a single post of his that's not full of insults, even when I've tried being civil. He is a troll, plain and simple

This is what lightsnake does when he gets embarassed and can't face facts. He starts using terminology he himself doesn't understand. Also I can find you at least 100 posts that I am not insulting anybody as can the rest of the people on here. Lightsnake has never tried being civil, and talking to him doesn't work because he's always delusional, so I don't take him seriously and just laugh when he posts angrily. His last recourse is calling someone a troll which is even funnier.