What's wrong with being Liberal?

Started by Nogoodnamesleft16 pages

Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

Originally posted by dani_california
I don't understand why people think of Liberals as crazed idiots looking to raise taxes. Believe it or not Liberalism is a legitimate way of thinking. Tell me what you think.

Liberals suck because they're wildly inefficient. Criminals deserve to be *punished*. Liberals would rather feel sorry for the offender rather than for the people who were his victims, even if the offender is a murderer or a pedophile or something. Liberals want to destroy the military. Any country that won't become another's byatch needs to have a good military. Liberals are the ones who have foul ideas, like making it illegal for airport security to detain and/or search Arabs, because if they did then they might "offend" them. In other words, according to liberals and the contagious brain-disease they support, political correctness, national and public safety and security-the lives of millions of people-are of no worth compared to not offending an unimportant minority that only wants to destroy western civilization anyways. Liberals would rather give druggies free drugs (at taxpayers' expense, of course) and "safe injection sites" instead of giving them a one-way ticket to a maximum security prison like they deserve. Liberals have no morals; they're the ones who support things like gay marriage and gay adoption (I don't give a rat shit what you think, even if they're not pedophiles, it still interferes with the child's right to grow up normally, and boys need to have the right male role models, a position that a homosexual cleary simply cannot fulfill). If liberals had their way, they'd probably think up something like "Pedophiles' Rights".

And besides that, liberals are so stupid that despite that many of them are white and male, they're only interested in the welfare of women and minorities.

I admit that conservatives can be stupid, that they can do foolish things, and that the religious nutjobs are some real retards, but in my experience, conservatives are intelligent, organized, and most of all, LOGICAL. There is nothing logical about liberals.

Re: Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

Originally posted by Nogoodnamesleft
Liberals suck because they're wildly inefficient. Criminals deserve to be *punished*. Liberals would rather feel sorry for the offender rather than for the people who were his victims, even if the offender is a murderer or a pedophile or something. Liberals want to destroy the military. Any country that won't become another's byatch needs to have a good military. Liberals are the ones who have foul ideas, like making it illegal for airport security to detain and/or search Arabs, because if they did then they might "offend" them. In other words, according to liberals and the contagious brain-disease they support, political correctness, national and public safety and security-the lives of millions of people-are of no worth compared to not offending an unimportant minority that only wants to destroy western civilization anyways. Liberals would rather give druggies free drugs (at taxpayers' expense, of course) and "safe injection sites" instead of giving them a one-way ticket to a maximum security prison like they deserve. Liberals have no morals; they're the ones who support things like gay marriage and gay adoption (I don't give a rat shit what you think, even if they're not pedophiles, it still interferes with the child's right to grow up normally, and boys need to have the right male role models, a position that a homosexual cleary simply cannot fulfill). If liberals had their way, they'd probably think up something like "Pedophiles' Rights".

And besides that, liberals are so stupid that despite that many of them are white and male, they're only interested in the welfare of women and minorities.

I admit that conservatives can be stupid, that they can do foolish things, and that the religious nutjobs are some real retards, but in my experience, conservatives are intelligent, organized, and most of all, LOGICAL. There is nothing logical about liberals.

wow. what a c*nt

...........and I'm not even a liberal

Re: Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

Originally posted by Nogoodnamesleft
Liberals suck because they're wildly inefficient. Criminals deserve to be *punished*. Liberals would rather feel sorry for the offender rather than for the people who were his victims, even if the offender is a murderer or a pedophile or something. Liberals want to destroy the military. Any country that won't become another's byatch needs to have a good military. Liberals are the ones who have foul ideas, like making it illegal for airport security to detain and/or search Arabs, because if they did then they might "offend" them. In other words, according to liberals and the contagious brain-disease they support, political correctness, national and public safety and security-the lives of millions of people-are of no worth compared to not offending an unimportant minority that only wants to destroy western civilization anyways. Liberals would rather give druggies free drugs (at taxpayers' expense, of course) and "safe injection sites" instead of giving them a one-way ticket to a maximum security prison like they deserve. Liberals have no morals; they're the ones who support things like gay marriage and gay adoption (I don't give a rat shit what you think, even if they're not pedophiles, it still interferes with the child's right to grow up normally, and boys need to have the right male role models, a position that a homosexual cleary simply cannot fulfill). If liberals had their way, they'd probably think up something like "Pedophiles' Rights".

And besides that, liberals are so stupid that despite that many of them are white and male, they're only interested in the welfare of women and minorities.

I admit that conservatives can be stupid, that they can do foolish things, and that the religious nutjobs are some real retards, but in my experience, conservatives are intelligent, organized, and most of all, LOGICAL. There is nothing logical about liberals.

Chillax cujo.

Re: Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

Originally posted by FeceMan

Maybe Soleran is not talking about people who are employed in jobs that would be classified as 'unskilled' but rather people who completely lack skills and thus have no chance to better themselves and thus live in poverty?

i wish i had picked up on it sooner, or i wouldnt have wasted my time arguing with him.

...but maybe thats the last we'll have to see of idiotic gross generalisations in this thread from people who have no idea what the **** they're talking about

Originally posted by Nogoodnamesleft
Liberals suck because they're wildly inefficient. Criminals deserve to be *punished*. Liberals would rather feel sorry for the offender rather than for the people who were his victims, even if the offender is a murderer or a pedophile or something. Liberals want to destroy the military. Any country that won't become another's byatch needs to have a good military. Liberals are the ones who have foul ideas, like making it illegal for airport security to detain and/or search Arabs, because if they did then they might "offend" them. In other words, according to liberals and the contagious brain-disease they support, political correctness, national and public safety and security-the lives of millions of people-are of no worth compared to not offending an unimportant minority that only wants to destroy western civilization anyways. Liberals would rather give druggies free drugs (at taxpayers' expense, of course) and "safe injection sites" instead of giving them a one-way ticket to a maximum security prison like they deserve. Liberals have no morals; they're the ones who support things like gay marriage and gay adoption (I don't give a rat shit what you think, even if they're not pedophiles, it still interferes with the child's right to grow up normally, and boys need to have the right male role models, a position that a homosexual cleary simply cannot fulfill). If liberals had their way, they'd probably think up something like "Pedophiles' Rights".

And besides that, liberals are so stupid that despite that many of them are white and male, they're only interested in the welfare of women and minorities.

I admit that conservatives can be stupid, that they can do foolish things, and that the religious nutjobs are some real retards, but in my experience, conservatives are intelligent, organized, and most of all, LOGICAL. There is nothing logical about liberals.

...or...maybe not

Originally posted by FeceMan
Maybe Soleran is not talking about people who are employed in jobs that would be classified as 'unskilled' but rather people who completely lack skills and thus have no chance to better themselves and thus live in poverty?
Like invalids and the mentally retarded? 😖

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Like invalids and the mentally retarded? 😖

Nah, just generally peopel who are not fit to lets say calculate the mass of a neutron star...

thats not a general trait of skilled laborers...not general in the least.

Re: Re: Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

to early for me to post, *edit deletes the comment*

Originally posted by Soleran
My only amusement with you is that you feel compelled to argue and to win even, WIN, there we go.
🤨

Re: Re: Re: Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

oops

Re: Re: Re: Re: What's wrong with being Liberal?

Originally posted by Soleran
My only amusement with you is that you feel compelled to argue and to win even, WIN, there we go.

yeah he feels passionate about his country. what an a-hole. you're right. that's pretty funny soleran. 😆 🤨

there is no winning, soleron. in fact i think thats what you were trying to do, at the expense of reserching the topic even slightly. perhaps just a dictionary would have saved us the trouble. so next time: first the dictionary, THEN the economic doom propaganda.

i hope you dont still choose to remain ignorant to the topic (or more acurately: semi-relevant subtopic).
if so, although there is no 'winner' in such a situation, there unfortunately is a loser.

Originally posted by PVS
there is no winning, soleron. that is why you choose still to remain ignorant to the topic (or more acurately: semi-relevant subtopic).
although there is no 'winner' in such a situation, there unfortunately is a loser.

More relevant perhaps is that I am not against increaseing wages but I don't like minimum wage increases just for the increase as I said before its a stop gap thats to little to late and not truly effective.

no 'winner' in such a situation, there unfortunately is a loser.

I agree with you here.

edit

Look, no one wants to remain a minimum wage earner. But the whole point of having a free economy is to allow wage earners to gather skills and experience with which to leverage better, higher paying jobs in the marketplace. PVS has pointed out that we will always need unskilled labor to subsidize our standard of living. I agree. However, just because unskilled labor is always needed, doesn't mean that the same people must supply this labor and never have the opportunity to earn something more. Most everyone I've ever met that's worth a damn has started out in a job earning minimum wage. None of them intended on staying in that position. That's because they understood what minimum wage jobs were for...to garner experience with which to move onto higher wages.

Originally posted by Dr. Zaius
That's because they understood what minimum wage jobs were for...to garner experience with which to move onto higher wages.

horseshit. please stop pretending to agree and then backpeddling out of it.
with all your intelligence and grand vocabulary, i am shocked and disgusted by your infinite ignorance with regards to the middle class, particularly unskilled labor. you have no idea what it really means or how crucial it is. all you see is the kid dipping fries at mcdonalds over school break and that to you is the sum of unskilled labor and your justification for allowing minimum wage to remain firmly below the line of poverty. please, dont respond. you just drop it, then ill drop it, and then i wont have to be annoyed.

Originally posted by Dr. Zaius
Look, no one wants to remain a minimum wage earner. But the whole point of having a free economy is to allow wage earners to gather skills and experience with which to leverage better, higher paying jobs in the marketplace. PVS has pointed out that we will always need unskilled labor to subsidize our standard of living. I agree. However, just because unskilled labor is always needed, doesn't mean that the same people must supply this labor and never have the opportunity to earn something more. Most everyone I've ever met that's worth a damn has started out in a job earning minimum wage. None of them intended on staying in that position. That's because they understood what minimum wage jobs were for...to garner experience with which to move onto higher wages.

Wow, hey, I'm with you on the capitalism side, but that's, as the old guy said, just horseshit. People do not get experience as unskilled labours and become managers or so...that is a minority if at all...

I saw the stupidest bumper sticker today: "MEAT IS MURDER!" 😐

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I saw the stupidest bumper sticker today: "MEAT IS MURDER!" 😐

It's also a great Album.