Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Its actually stated what the patient is. Its stated to be the badly wounded universe.Its actually stated that Jean was to grow a NEW future to REPLACE the one she cut away.
With that in mind how can Mr M's idea that she took away the future and added it back on be right?
Plus if Jean went about solving the problem by altering past events then how can she just be adding on the amputated future which is the result of the previously unaltered events. Get what im saying now?
This is what I got from it.
Jean amputated the future to disinfect it, by doing this she damaged that same future, this is from mr m's scans, Jean does ask, "is this the future" and it does respond, "you lost concentration, shock almost killed it" so obviously the future is damaged in some way.
It is then repaired by Jean in the whr, like mr m showed, it then tells Jean, "controlling those atoms was not as easy as it looks".....it makes sense that it's talking about a feat that was just performed, and the only thing that seems to have been done is the future being repaired.
I also realized when Jean asks, "did I have to fix something that was dying?"
It doesn't say anything, when Jean asked, "what is it?" it responds, "a badly wounded orphan universe"
Here is where mr m's arguement wins for me, Jean asks after this, "but what's that supposed to mean?" and it replies, "That Henry's heart's broken, that Scott succumbs to loneliness" So that universe in her hands was exactly what mr m said, a representation of the events of here comes tomorrow.
Jean then replaces the future(here comes tomorrow)with another one by changing Scott's mind about Emma, and like I said Grant Morrison and the writers agreed on this, I saw it with my own eyes on the back of #155.