Originally posted by King Kandy
It could just be a viewing sort of thing... Like the way Braddock wasn't ACTUALY in Alfie's TV.
I found out what really happened.
Alfie's Universe is from a Comic titled "Nth Man" ... (published by Marvel of course)
I didn't know this guy had his own title through the early and mid nineties.
Ok so, that means that Jamie definitely did not create that Universe BUT,
Jamie was manipulating that Universe through "Nth Man's" Comic book.
(Which is Amazing)
This is why Nth Man himself said,
"I recognize the designs (he and his partner are wearing X-Men suits)
they belong to Two Characters named Nightcrawler and Phoenix"
His partner replies,
"You mean we are costumed as characters in a Comic Book?"
"I will not be treated like some toy, provided for the amusement of Alfie O'Meagan"
(Nth Man) says,
"I suspect, though, This isn't altogether Alfie's doing"
..............................................................................
Apparently there's an X-Men Comic book series in Alfie's World just like in real life,
Nth Man knows they've been Universally Switched,
and he also knows someone else is behind this. (Jamie Braddock)
So Jamie was able to pick up a "Nth Man" Comic book in 616,
and incredibly manipulate the Real "Nth Man" Universe,
by manipulating the artwork in the Comic book.
*This Feat is so unique and complex I had to read the issue again*
Jamie earns respect on this one. 🙂
Originally posted by Mr Master
I found out what really happened.Alfie's Universe is from a Comic titled "Nth Man" ... (published by Marvel of course)
I didn't know this guy had his own title through the early and mid nineties.Ok so, that means that Jamie definitely did not create that Universe BUT,
Jamie was manipulating that Universe through "Nth Man's" Comic book.
(Which is Amazing)
This is why Nth Man himself said,
"I recognize the designs (he and his partner are wearing X-Men suits)
they belong to Two Characters named Nightcrawler and Phoenix"His partner replies,
"You mean we are costumed as characters in a Comic Book?"
"I will not be treated like some toy, provided for the amusement of Alfie O'Meagan"
(Nth Man) says,
"I suspect, though, This isn't altogether Alfie's doing"
..............................................................................
Apparently there's an X-Men Comic book series in Alfie's World just like in real life,
Nth Man knows they've been Universally Switched,
and he also knows someone else is behind this. (Jamie Braddock)So Jamie was able to pick up a "Nth Man" Comic book in 616,
and incredibly manipulate the Real "Nth Man" Universe,
by manipulating the artwork in the Comic book.*This Feat is so unique and complex I had to read the issue again*
Jamie earns respect on this one. 🙂
Mr. M, have u read about New Son
Originally posted by Mr Master
Can't say I have.Link? Or Titles he's appeared in?
http://www.marveldatabase.com/New_Son 🙂
Issues were pretty good
Originally posted by King Kandy
Also, that comic seems to imply that Alfie and Jamie are connected in some way... That's what Jamie's "I thought I was one of a kind" comment comes in.I know Jamie had an Nth-man comic,
but is there any proof he actualy did anything through it?
Jamie says,
"Bye-Bye Nth Man it's been - giggle - Real"
"I wanted my piece of that Playground,
he took the Comic Book with him"
"Can't play with other Realities, Have to make my own"
.......................................................................
I think it's conclusive,
Jamie was manipulating Alfie's Universe through the Nth Man Comic Book.
Also,
it seems Alfie's Universe,
was within the Nth Man Comic Book within the Alternate Reality Excalibur was in to begin with.
Excalibur was not in Alfie's Universe but another Reality,
that also contained a Nth Man Comic Book, with Nth Man's Universe in it apparently.
That's the ONLY other Nth Man Comic Book besides Jamie's.
So Jamie used his Nth Man Comic Book to control the contents
within the Nth Man Comic Book in the Alternate Reality Excalibur was in.
Now HOW Alfie's Universe ended up within that Comic Book is a mystery,
perhaps only it's Life-Force was connected to it and not the actual Universe itself.
Sortalike Merlyn and his Crystals.
Originally posted by Takion
So, uh Did the SOK kill like some god that was Odin level or something?
Didn't he kill the God of some Comic Book company?
That whole mess is wierd how can you kill the God of a Reality?
Unless he wasn't a true God, or SOK was a greater God,
which doesn't make sense because he was created by the God he killed. 😂
Comics slap themselves in the face sometimes, especially involving Cosmics.
In Marvel though, no one is killing TOAA.
the rules that apply are different from company to company.
Roma's scond in command has ridiculous Authority and Power just like her boss:
Saturnyne
"The Omniversal Mastrex"
...........................................................................
"Who is she"
"Absolute Monarch of all she survey's "
...........................................................................
"The Mastrex (Saturnyne) what can you tell us about her?"
"She maintains order across the Dimensional Planes ...
working in concert with the Guardian Roma
to keep the Sidereal Strings from fraying,
or getting knotted and perhaps breaking"
"Is she a Telepath ... any Powers at all?"
"That never seemed to matter"
"Bat her eyes, waggle her bottom ...
the Whole of Creation turns to putty in her hands"
Originally posted by Mr Master
Didn't he kill the God of some Comic Book company?That whole mess is wierd how can you kill the God of a Reality?
Unless he wasn't a true God, or SOK was a greater God,
which doesn't make sense because he was created by the God he killed. 😂
Comics slap themselves in the face sometimes, especially involving Cosmics.
In Marvel though, no one is killing TOAA.
the rules that apply are different from company to company.
Hey Mr. M.
You know much about Parallax from the crisis Zero Hour in DC? Seen you debating him and you had some scans with you so not sure.
If you do, where would you rank him in the Marvel Cosmic Hierarchy and is there anyone who be a good match for him? Not someone who would beat him. Lots of those. Just someone who be a awesome fight with.
Thanks.
Also Mr. M
I'm in this thread about Galactus' Origins.
http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?p=5124781#post5124781
The guy was using stuff from GS but I wisely warned everyone not to and posted your five depictions of Galactus being created with no mention of the PF at all.
But I'm wondering, which is the most recent depiction? And does it say anythign about this in recent handbooks?
And finally, this person has a question for me because I posted those origin scans but you're the one who has the issue so it's better suited for you i reckon.
"I have a question, though- where does that Fourth version come from? It mentions the Enigma Force empowering Galactus, which is rather interesting, as it raises a lot of questions regarding Galactus and his relationship to the Microverse/Captain Universe. Is it supposed to be the same Enigma Force?"
Don't ask Mr. M anything about DC. 🙄 He doesn't know enough to be an authority.
Mr. Master, can Mad Jim Jaspers beat the IG?
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/457640_1-Anti-Monitor-vs-Thanos-w-e-the-IG
I said it could in this thread, I was wondering if I'm correct.
Originally posted by Nikkolas
Hey Mr. M.You know much about Parallax from the crisis Zero Hour in DC? Seen you debating him and you had some scans with you so not sure.
If you do, where would you rank him in the Marvel Cosmic Hierarchy and is there anyone who be a good match for him? Not someone who would beat him. Lots of those. Just someone who be a awesome fight with.
Thanks.
I have Zero Hour,
Parallax erased one Timeline/Universe, and was going to re-write it.
Parallax was experienced enough and inadvertantly was causing other Realities to blink in and out.
I think Photon would be an interesting opponent.
Originally posted by Nikkolas
your five depictions of Galactus being created with no mention of the PF at all.
Correct.
Originally posted by Nikkolas
But I'm wondering, which is the most recent depiction?
Most recent depiction that I know of is this one: (2007)
I forgot where this is from, I'll look into it.
Originally posted by Nikkolas
And does it say anythign about this in recent handbooks?
Nothing's changed.
