Originally posted by leonidas
really? he had a part of the watcher's talisman, at least. i have no idea why. you're the cosmic guy. why DID he take it?i'm afraid the only thing funny is your creative cropping abilities. again . . .
sure g willed it from his hand. and as the scan shows, abraxas clearly enjoyed the moment . . .
😆
whew . . .
this from the guy who says that when an eternity m-body leaves a universe, it takes ALL of the universe with it because it IS the 'whole' universe, that warlock confronted multi-eternity and that thanos clearly destroyed the multiverse. 🙄
1. where exactly in the end does it say that thanos destroyed the multiverse again?
2. where does it say multi-eternity in that warlock issue?
ohhh, you're speculating, you say? using outside the book resources and trying to draw inferences? so . . . it's all right if you do it, but what, no one else can . . .?
really? then why does he have to tell g that he has an ACE up his sleeve?
or did i miss where that was actually said in the arc . . .? i did see the part where g told abraxas he was nothing. i know, i know, galactus was using hyperbole . . . of course he was . . .
galactus had no intention of using the UN. why not, exactly? you have repeatedly said that he has the ultimate control -- he could certainly have used it to focus on abraxas, no? or he could himself have used it to wipe out everything. why not on just abraxas? imo because that would have done nothing. abraxas was a symptom, NOT the problem. the multiverse was unhinged by g's death. because of thatdeath, abraxas was freed.
😆 that was you?? you won't believe me, but i actually didn't know/remember it was you who started that . . .
sticking to the topic at hand let's start with this:
care to show anyone WHERE this was shown OR been stated to have happened in the arc . . .?
🤨
first, it was in the letter col. yeah, it's a bulletin, so . . .? . . . just who do you THINK wrote it? it's an editor's bulletin. what the hell, you think they just let some guy off the street walk up and write a summary of the story and they stuck it in the letter col?
let's add this one to the list:
could you show all of us the part where multi-eternity is quaking in fear? or a part that tells us he is afraid at all . . .?
nice scan showing reed talked to abraxas. and . . . 😕
🤨
"HE" referred to abraxas. reed had found out about him, and was saying it didn't matter. abraxas thought he knew the knowledge wouldn't help them.
it is sorta funny that you constantly deride others for not showing on-panel feats and exaggerating or lying then you tell us multi-eternity is 'quaking' in fear (and show a SCAN as it it somehow proves your point!) then you tell everyone abraxas is collapsing the multiverse (something else never shown or stated to have happened) and then say g didn't even manage to hurt him at all and show a cropped scan that by-passes the panel that has him screaming!
the hell am i saying -- in retrospect it IS damn funny!!
mm, i seriously can't believe you posted that last scan. the same one i quoted, then said:
now in your scan, it says:
[b]"Until this reality's galactus died. And the doors to the multiverse became unhinged."
in your own QUOTE with your own SCAN you said exactly what i said (well . . . except for the part where you added your own text to the scene, something you would crucify someone for) -- GALACTUS'S DEATH UNHINGED THE DOORS TO THE MULTIVERSE!
was abraxas released? of course. but the multiverse was ALREADY unhinged, set out of whack by galactus's death. how much more clearly does a being with omniversal knowledge have to state things??
please, somewhere, SHOW me -- show all of us -- where it says abraxas is a multiversal destroyer!! reed says that if abraxas gets the UN he could destroy the multiverse, abraxas HIMSELF says once he HAS the UN no soul in the universes could stop him. what does that imply? it implies someone could PREVIOUSLY have had the power to stop him. or shall you dismiss it has 'crappy writing' once again?
do you or do you not have on-panel evidence (that does NOT rely on your interpretation of the story or your OWN speculation) that says abraxas is a mutliversal destroyer?? [/B]
💃
there are certain members you don't screw around with, and leo is certainly one of them.
Originally posted by leonidas
really? he had a part of the watcher's talisman, at least. i have no idea why. you're the cosmic guy. why DID he take it?i'm afraid the only thing funny is your creative cropping abilities. again . . .
sure g willed it from his hand. and as the scan shows, abraxas clearly enjoyed the moment . . .
😆
whew . . .
this from the guy who says that when an eternity m-body leaves a universe, it takes ALL of the universe with it because it IS the 'whole' universe, that warlock confronted multi-eternity and that thanos clearly destroyed the multiverse. 🙄
1. where exactly in the end does it say that thanos destroyed the multiverse again?
2. where does it say multi-eternity in that warlock issue?
ohhh, you're speculating, you say? using outside the book resources and trying to draw inferences? so . . . it's all right if you do it, but what, no one else can . . .?
really? then why does he have to tell g that he has an ACE up his sleeve?
or did i miss where that was actually said in the arc . . .? i did see the part where g told abraxas he was nothing. i know, i know, galactus was using hyperbole . . . of course he was . . .
galactus had no intention of using the UN. why not, exactly? you have repeatedly said that he has the ultimate control -- he could certainly have used it to focus on abraxas, no? or he could himself have used it to wipe out everything. why not on just abraxas? imo because that would have done nothing. abraxas was a symptom, NOT the problem. the multiverse was unhinged by g's death. because of thatdeath, abraxas was freed.
😆 that was you?? you won't believe me, but i actually didn't know/remember it was you who started that . . .
sticking to the topic at hand let's start with this:
care to show anyone WHERE this was shown OR been stated to have happened in the arc . . .?
🤨
first, it was in the letter col. yeah, it's a bulletin, so . . .? . . . just who do you THINK wrote it? it's an editor's bulletin. what the hell, you think they just let some guy off the street walk up and write a summary of the story and they stuck it in the letter col?
let's add this one to the list:
could you show all of us the part where multi-eternity is quaking in fear? or a part that tells us he is afraid at all . . .?
nice scan showing reed talked to abraxas. and . . . 😕
🤨
"HE" referred to abraxas. reed had found out about him, and was saying it didn't matter. abraxas thought he knew the knowledge wouldn't help them.
it is sorta funny that you constantly deride others for not showing on-panel feats and exaggerating or lying then you tell us multi-eternity is 'quaking' in fear (and show a SCAN as it it somehow proves your point!) then you tell everyone abraxas is collapsing the multiverse (something else never shown or stated to have happened) and then say g didn't even manage to hurt him at all and show a cropped scan that by-passes the panel that has him screaming!
the hell am i saying -- in retrospect it IS damn funny!!
mm, i seriously can't believe you posted that last scan. the same one i quoted, then said:
now in your scan, it says:
[b]"Until this reality's galactus died. And the doors to the multiverse became unhinged."
in your own QUOTE with your own SCAN you said exactly what i said (well . . . except for the part where you added your own text to the scene, something you would crucify someone for) -- GALACTUS'S DEATH UNHINGED THE DOORS TO THE MULTIVERSE!
was abraxas released? of course. but the multiverse was ALREADY unhinged, set out of whack by galactus's death. how much more clearly does a being with omniversal knowledge have to state things??
please, somewhere, SHOW me -- show all of us -- where it says abraxas is a multiversal destroyer!! reed says that if abraxas gets the UN he could destroy the multiverse, abraxas HIMSELF says once he HAS the UN no soul in the universes could stop him. what does that imply? it implies someone could PREVIOUSLY have had the power to stop him. or shall you dismiss it has 'crappy writing' once again?
do you or do you not have on-panel evidence (that does NOT rely on your interpretation of the story or your OWN speculation) that says abraxas is a mutliversal destroyer?? [/B]
Somebodys 😮💨 💃
And I Say Parallax wins he has more on panel feats and at times of desperation thats the card certain members seem to pull out.
Originally posted by juggernaut66666
What the hell are you talking about????
He did it easily. Show me a scan where he say it took all his power to do it.
Read Zero Hour #0, at the end of it he was almost completely drained, I think its Waverider who says it. But in Green Lantern #0, which takes place just after they land on Oa and he has almost no power left.
And it's not always a matter of feats. Eclipso has many more impressive feats then Dr Light. But Dr Light can beat him easily because of the type of power he has.
Parallax can create rifts that erase time, but you haven't proven that Abraxas can be destroyed by Entropy.
Originally posted by Starhawk
Read Zero Hour #0, at the end of it he was almost completely drained, I think its Waverider who says it. But in Green Lantern #0, which takes place just after they land on Oa and he has almost no power left.And it's not always a matter of feats. Eclipso has many more impressive feats then Dr Light. But Dr Light can beat him easily because of the type of power he has.
Parallax can create rifts that erase time, but you haven't proven that Abraxas can be destroyed by Entropy.
Neither have you proven that it won't destroy him
Originally posted by Starhawk
Ill leave that to the other guy but when were they 'leeching' off of him? I'd like to see a scan of that.If if we have no proof if Entropy CAN destroy Abraxas, then it's an open question which cannot be resolved.
Nice try, they were abosrbing the Universe he was trying to create, not leeching off of him. So they absorbed the universe he wanted to create and he didn't have the power to do it a second time.
If if we have no proof if Entropy CAN destroy Abraxas, then it's an open question which cannot be resolved.
Originally posted by Starhawk
Nice try, they were abosrbing the Universe he was trying to create, not leeching off of him. So they absorbed the universe he wanted to create and he didn't have the power to do it a second time.If if we have no proof if Entropy CAN destroy Abraxas, then it's an open question which cannot be resolved.
Originally posted by juggernaut66666
Please just shut the **** up and read Zero Hour .
I have, he created one universe, they absorbed it and he didn't have the power to do it again.
and there's still:
"If if we have no proof if Entropy CAN destroy Abraxas, then it's an open question which cannot be resolved."
"It is working we are absorbing most of Parallax's energy"
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a366/juggernaut66666/1-2.jpg
