Thanos vs Superman

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So the aformentioned feats of Hulk.. including the ones carver named... along with thunder clapping through dimensions... holding up mountain ranges and Pyramids... PG feat in the WWH arc... Thor and the M.S. incident...Hercules holding up both earth and the "weight" of the universe on seperate occasions. Drax crushing the core of the sun with his bare hands etc etc... The lines up just fine with Superman best strengths feats... All these people who have strength feats comparable to Superman have gotten punked like weak feebs by Thanos. We aren't talking about quantity.. we're talking quality which is all that matters here. It doesn't matter how often they do it.. it only matters that they can do it and proven such.

Futhermore, you keep on ducking the question I continue to ask... How can you compare strength feats of heroes against villians who don't have such feats. You even made the ludicris claim that Superman was stronger than Despero.... Yet Despero was punking superman WITH HELP like a weak feeb. But but but.. despero has no lifting feats.. thus superman is stronger? WTF. That line of thinking is so ass-backwards and illogical I don't even know what to say about it. The fact is, villians like Thanos, DS, Mangog, Despero... aren't going to have lifting and pulling feats that heroes do. What they will have, are feats of punking heralds with lifting feats like weak feebs. Ya know kinda like Despero punking Superman with help from the league at the same time like a weakling.

Originally posted by carver9
A weakened Hulk held together a splitting in half planet sakaar which is TWICE the size of Earth "together" with nothing but brute strength.

Hulk punches were strong against Onslaught that it was creative shockwaves so powerful that it was even pushing high Heralds back. A weakened Hulk destroyed an asteroid twice the size of Earth. Hulk has also held apart a positve and negative antimatter bomb from touching each other.

All of this is strength.

The onslaught thing wasn't normal Hulk. Jean Grey had something to do with that. Holding a planet together is an insect to Superman top feats of strength. The antimatter bomb feat is a non feat since positive negative charge force is equal to or less than the electromagnetic force, which is fairly weak.

All in all, Hulk at his best is still an insect to Superman at his best. This is fact.

Originally posted by h1a8
You can't use unquantifiable feats. Hercules never held up the full weight of the Earth. For if he would have let go then the Earth would have been still in place. All other quantifiable feats are still garbage to Superman's best.

The onslaught thing wasn't normal Hulk. Jean Grey had something to do with that. Holding a planet together is an insect to Superman top feats of strength. The antimatter bomb feat is a non feat since positive negative charge force is equal to or less than the electromagnetic force, which is fairly weak.

All in all, Hulk at his best is still an insect to Superman at his best. This is fact.

The Onslaught saga Hulk was still Hulk and going by Reed, Professor X, Tony, and Shield statements... current Hulk>any Hulk that has walked the Earth.

What feats does Superman have that makes Hulk planetary feat look like an insect?

Originally posted by carver9
I'm not going to lie, I did use it as a high end feat but ithe feat that you are talking about me discrediting is kind of different than the Hulk feat.

Which one?

Originally posted by carver9
Hyperbole and BS.

Pot, meet kettle.

.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi So the aformentioned feats of Hulk.. including the ones carver named... along with thunder clapping through dimensions... holding up mountain ranges and Pyramids... PG feat in the WWH arc... Thor and the M.S. incident...Hercules holding up both earth and the "weight" of the universe on seperate occasions. Drax crushing the core of the sun with his bare hands etc etc... The lines up just fine with Superman best strengths feats... All these people who have strength feats comparable to Superman have gotten punked like weak feebs by Thanos. We aren't talking about quantity.. we're talking quality which is all that matters here. It doesn't matter how often they do it.. it only matters that they can do it and proven such.

In fact, show me some of Marvel characters strength based characters [a character we can directly relate in a performance to Thanos] most impressive[top ten] feats of raw strength over the last 10 years, and we'll put them up in a bracket against Superman's performances.

Futhermore, you keep on ducking the question I continue to ask... How can you compare strength feats of heroes against villians who don't have such feats. You even made the ludicris claim that Superman was stronger than Despero.... Yet Despero was punking superman WITH HELP like a weak feeb. But but but.. despero has no lifting feats.. thus superman is stronger? WTF. That line of thinking is so ass-backwards and illogical I don't even know what to say about it. The fact is, villians like Thanos, DS, Mangog, Despero... aren't going to have lifting and pulling feats that heroes do. What they will have, are feats of punking heralds with lifting feats like weak feebs. Ya know kinda like Despero punking Superman with help from the league at the same time like a weakling.

Because suggesting Thanos is physically stronger than character A) whos stronger than B) and C), does nothing for me when Superman and his DC peers operate on a drastically higher level physically on a regular basis.

We have multiple instances -- all recent -- of Superman in combat casually and repeatedly throwing punches that would shatter a moon, not even suggesting he's at his limit, but more-so, impressed when an enemy shrugs them off. When a Marvel 'Character A' does something even remotely close to it, it's a ****ing two page spread, with lots of pretty extra lines and shit, that will go down as one of the highlights of their 40 year history, and will be used as a benchmark of why they're in a 'Superman level' class, even though it's quite blatantly obvious to anyone following the trend of Superman doing amazing shit, that it's anything but the truth. Then they conflate this event onto another character, because 10 years before this event even happened, 'Character C' beat the bejeezes out of that guy.

Which is exactly the type of arguement being presented to me here.

Dodging. Tangents. Lovely. Expected.

Originally posted by h1a8
You must didn't read this.

sure did. Superman has the ability to pass thanos in strength via a sundip. But this dosent mean he can defeat thanos. They are 2 diffrent types of characters. Supes would fair better against thanos them prolly any other hearald. Look at surfer. Surfer is built to kill hearlds like superman. Surfer cant even touch thanos. Just dont see supes beating him unless they are fighting in the center of the sun and thanos is fighting like a idiot. And even then thanos cannot be killed.

Originally posted by zeel
sure did. Superman has the ability to pass thanos in strength via a sundip. But this dosent mean he can defeat thanos. They are 2 diffrent types of characters. Supes would fair better against thanos them prolly any other hearald. Look at surfer. Surfer is built to kill hearlds like superman. Surfer cant even touch thanos. Just dont see supes beating him unless they are fighting in the center of the sun and thanos is fighting like a idiot. And even then thanos cannot be killed.

So you are claiming that Thanos has super speed on the level of Superman where he can defend against a blitz or not be phased by Superman's physical punches.

Are you saying this?

Originally posted by h1a8
So you are claiming that Thanos has super speed on the level of Superman where he can defend against a blitz or not be phased by Superman's physical punches.

Are you saying this?

Yes, that's exactly what he is saying.

Originally posted by h1a8
So you are claiming that Thanos has super speed on the level of Superman where he can defend against a blitz or not be phased by Superman's physical punches.

Are you saying this?

take it how you want it if thats what you get outta my statment then ok.

Originally posted by Juntai
No sir, lifting, pulling, real feats of strength that don't involve A> B > C character-wise are what I'm after.

Regular footfalls doing damage like that has more to do with mass being gained. Strength doesn't do something like that. Now if he was purposely stomping and doing that? Sure. That'd be alright, but then that would even be less impressive in my opinion than Death of Superman against Doomsday, Superman was causing seismic shifts around the entire globe with the blows landed [which obviously were not even directed at the actual planet itself, so that's only residual effect after Doomsday took the brunt of the energy of strikes]. And that Superman, is considered substantially weaker than the current version.

you're a smart guy, i know you know better than that

there is a reason almost 70% of the forums are voting for thanos hehe.

Originally posted by zeel
there is a reason almost 70% of the forums are voting for thanos hehe.

And the 70% that is voting for him is saying that its a outright stomp.

Originally posted by carver9
And the 70% that is voting for him is saying that its a outright stomp.

because the majority voting for anything is always so trustworthy. 😬

Originally posted by -Pr-
because the majority voting for anything is always so trustworthy. 😬

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
This time it is

There's less than 10% of people here who actually read both of them to make an accurate judgement.

Originally posted by Philosophía
70% of the people on the forum don't consistently read Thanos, nevermind Superman.

There's less than 10% of people here who actually read both of them to make an accurate judgement.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
All 10% or lower voted for Thanos

Originally posted by Philosophía
Incorrect, penisface.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
If Carver gives Thanos the win, then I'm inclined to believe him over you and your fake stats.

Originally posted by carver9
Gladiator win 6/10.

Exactly, Carver hates Thanos. If he can put his hate aside to give him a forum win, then Thanos must win here.