Originally posted by Magee
It must be God I mean brain tumours dont just go away like they never existed, what more proof could you ask for. Why do you people hate God so much? He is my saviour and I am saved BLESS THEE LORD!
😇
Just because science can't explain it at this point, doesn't mean that science can't explain it later using natural means. As a young and up and coming scientist myself, I understand the necessity of being subjective as possible when interpreting such phenomena, and being open minded enough to interpret such phenomena using all natural explinations.
Let me clarify. Science has no objective answers. Quite simply put, there are no absolute answers in science. Some may counter this fundemental-scientific logic with the argument does 2 + 2 = 4?(This argument is often times used by those who assert that mathematics, is an absolute concept used in science).
My rebuttal to this silly question is of course 2 + 2 fundementally equals 4, but only in the positional numeral system of base 13. If I were to assign another base to this axiom, then logically I'd get another fundamental answer. What I mean by this is that number schemas can only be determined as absolute, if they have a fundemental starting point to work with, or a base.
Moving on, you may now be pondering about how my above statements can be fundementally true with no absolutes existing. The answer to this question is quite simple. From the perspective of a scientist, you'd have to do a series tests to prove my statements untrue. How does one prove something untrue if they have no absolute basis to work upon? Well again, scienfically speaking, it's been fundementally accepted by scientists that one can't really prove a negative statement.
So with all that being stated, there really is no way for you to prove my above statements as untrue. However again, from the scientific perspective, you could provide a positive statement that contradicts my own, which includes evidence and proves to myself and my colleagues that your statement could be true.
We would then perform a battery of unbiased, logical, and natural tests to determine the validity of your hypothesis. But remember, even if we found your hypothesis to be the more logical one, it still wouldn't make it an absolute. It would just mean that it was the best answer we had at the time, or more specifically, the best answer that assisted us in supporting our beliefs at the time.
This is how science works. As scientists, we don't just make up things to support our opinions or beliefs. We base all of our decisions on logic and reason.
So to simplify things, science doesn't have all of the answers. But we understand that we can come up with all the answers eventually, by using the natural means made available to us. I hope this post has been informative to you(sic).
Sincerely,
Thundar