Originally posted by Tha C-Master
2. Just read the thread, this isn't meant to be a bashfest, this is meant to be simple.
I glanced through it..
All I saw was the feat from Civil War 7: which I already disproved as definitive proof in this debate.
The spiderman dodging electro's blasts feat: in regards to this we've seen wolverine dodge living lightning. He may not have produced the same amount of consisant agility there.. but at that point he didn't need to....
still it stands.. spiderman's fast enough to dodge electric currents; so to was wolverine.
And then the feat from MTU (what is that? 23 I think)...
Meh, Spiderman's hard to shoot and agile.. it's a good feat to show that he's hard to shoot.. and extremely agile.. it's not a good feat to show him faster than wolverine.. wolverine's dodged beams before too.. it's not a big deal. Hell he was noncholantly hopping around lazers as early as uncanny 106 and said it wasn't even hard for him to do.
Did that feat prove spiderman's faster? No not really....
Let's also not forget how evil Iron man plucked spidey out of the air in that encounter as well.. it's really not a good speed feat of speed concerning h2h situations as much as dodging blasts that's for damned sure...
did I miss any?