Revan & Malak vs Obi-Wan & Anakin

Because Yoda is better then Dooku and it more depends on a user of the form, then actual form.

Originally posted by Count Makashi
Oiu-Gon used the same form and he couldn't do the same thing as Yoda, Dooku said that Ataru is better for small people like Yoda, not for humans.

Maul had a double bladed lightsaber, he needed more space, Maul was just better then Qui-Gon. And when they fought on those bridges and before in the hangar, their wose a lot of rome then.

Source for that other than Wookiee?

Because Maul seems to use much more acrobatics and has a much larger weapon.

"Kenobi's Master had been Qui-Gon Jinn, Dooku's own Padawan; Dooku had fenced Qui-Gon thousands of times, and he knew every weakness of the Atar[u] form, with its ridiculous acrobatics."

But did Qui-Gon perform any in the fight. No.

Acrobatics? Yeah, he did alot of jumping and spinning. Besides, it's better to judge facts than actors.

I meant that he dint jump around and doing flips like Yoda, he cant do that.

Not like Yoda, but he does use acrobats....

Maul was just better, then Qui-Gon, end of story.

Pretty much, though I'd say that Qui-Gon was technically better than Maul, he just didn't have the same kind of speed and stamina, and overall skill.

It takes extreme skill and technique to wield double blades lightsaber.

It was specifically stated that Maul was a better weapon user than Qui-Gon in the TPM novel...

Originally posted by allfg
Pretty much, though I'd say that Qui-Gon was technically better than Maul, he just didn't have the same kind of speed and stamina, and overall skill.

Wrong

What part, that Maul is better, or Oui-Gon was technically better?

It's during the ending battle, at the part with Qui-Gon's thoughts I believe. Anyway, Maul was just better....

I agree.

Qui Gon is inferior to Maul as the novelization states. So is obiwan

We all agree.

team two

In a lightsaber match yea, but in overall fight, team 1wins.