Largest School Shooting in American History

Started by Schecter41 pages

ok...

HS part 1:

Originally posted by LordFear
He was brilliant to be able to evade suspicion for four years in a pretty tough school to excel in, as I understand it.

all anyone has to do to avoid suspision is not get caught with weapons and not kill anyone. he was doing good in school? wow impressive

HS part 2:

Originally posted by LordFear
Many people ask themselves how did he make it to senior year? He was extremely knowledge in the technology aspect of things. It was reported that in the manifesto, the way it was set up was pretty skilled. He had a very good working knowledge of how to manipulate what he needed to set this whole thing up.

im sure that would have looked ok on his resume. so he was a good student...again. how is this a sign of brilliance?

HS part 3:

Originally posted by LordFear
I mean obviously buying his time, trying to stay low under radar and avoiding suspicion when warranted. Plus one of his professors said that he was quite well versed in his creative art class/ just the stuff was too damn nightmarish.

he was artistic...and a good student....and he was able to not get caught with guns and wait to kill people. thats it? so he's brilliant?

(HS = HorseShit)

Originally posted by chithappens
What's brilliant about no one giving a **** to really find out what happened?

How do you account for him successfully accomplishing his academic years? ANyway I am not hear to defend Cho, its just to me he was not an idiot. Its fine to insult him on what he did and his actions but being objective and saying that it took smarts to accomplish with such devastating precision what he did to me is undeniable.

Originally posted by LordFear
He was brilliant to be able to evade suspicion for four years in a pretty tough school to excel in, as I understand it. Many people ask themselves how did he make it to senior year? He was extremely knowledge in the technology aspect of things. It was reported that in the manifesto, the way it was set up was pretty skilled. He had a very good working knowledge of how to manipulate what he needed to set this whole thing up. I mean obviously buying his time, trying to stay low under radar and avoiding suspicion when warranted. Plus one of his professors said that he was quite well versed in his creative art class/ just the stuff was too damn nightmarish.

But he didn't avoid suspicion. Over the last year or so he had the cops called on him several times for different things, and people knew he had problems, that he was possibly suicidal and withdrawn from others. He even had to go to to a mental hospital at one point.

The only thing he did was not go completely nuts until he knew he could take a lot of people with him.

He certainly was not brilliant, he just wasn't a complete moron.

Originally posted by Schecter
ok...

HS part 1:

all anyone has to do to avoid suspision is not get caught with weapons and not kill anyone. doing good in school? wow impressive 😬

HS part 2:

yeah, im sure that looked ok on his resume. so he was a good student. wow. amazing. how is this a sign of brilliance?

HS part 3:

he was artistic...and a good student. thats it? so he's brilliant?

would you prefer if I said smart rather than brilliant?
Is the semantic thing really what's bothering you?

And compared to the Colombine kids, Cho was a freaking genius. Two idiots who were uncoordinated and half assed. They planned to bomb the school and brought the tools to do it but the clock they used to set the time bomb wasn't metallic/magnetic and hence failed. I mean Cho demonstrated much more savage cunning than that.

(HS = HorseShit)

so anyone who does good in school is brilliant. you're cheap use of the word "brilliant" reminds me of those "Proud Parent of an Honor Student" bumperstickers.

:edit: and he's a genius because he was economical with his weaponry. wow. i bow to you. [/super-compressed sarcasm:beware]

Originally posted by Schecter
so anyone who does good in school is brilliant. you're cheap use of the word "brilliant" reminds me of those "Proud Parent of an Honor Student" bumperstickers.

:edit: and he's a genius because he was economical with his weaponry. wow. i bow to you. [/super-compressed sarcasm:beware]

Dude why are you raging?
Nobody said shit to you but you seem to be writing with such contempt and venom perhaps this forum is not the proper venue for you to express your grief cuz obviously you seem to not understand what an objective point of view is. Leave your sentiments at the door if you are not capable of engaging in rational discourse with inane sarcasm

I mean Backfire's post was rational and objective.It wasn't guided with emotions and any kind cynicism. Why don't you follow a page in his book?

Originally posted by LordFear
Dude why are you raging?

im not raging.

just irritated that every time someone manages to kill more than 10 people
its "OMG DEY WERE TEH GENEUSEZ! from someone without a clue about it.
so, lets not have a flame war, just reserve posting statements which
you never took the time to think through, at least just a tiny bit.

All the little girls in my basement say that I'm brilliant (unless they want the hose again).

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Good t.v is not nothing.
Ummm.......ok.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by FeceMan
All the little girls in my basement say that I'm brilliant (unless they want the hose again).

All the Young Girls Love Alice.....

Tender Young Alice they'd say....

Originally posted by LordFear
How do you account for him successfully accomplishing his academic years? ANyway I am not hear to defend Cho, its just to me he was not an idiot. Its fine to insult him on what he did and his actions but being objective and saying that it took smarts to accomplish with such devastating precision what he did to me is undeniable.

No he was not good academically at all, I've read two of his plays and they are in absolutely no way degree standard. They were about the level of a fifteen year old at absolute best.
I don't know how he stayed in college as long as he did, and it gives a bleak view at the education system that he did.

I think Cho was just plain out evil and retarded.

Honestly why does everyone care so much about the shooter? The main point is 32 people died because of some psycho. Wherever you go all you here is "oh yeah that shooter guy was crazy! I heard he had 2 9mms and killed a shitload of people!" Seriously, everyone should just care a bit more for all the innocent people who died and stop focusing on the moron who did this all.

Originally posted by Spartan005
Seriously, everyone should just care a bit more for all the innocent people who died and stop focusing on the moron who did this all.

or not

Originally posted by Schecter
or not

Or maybe you're just an *******?

Originally posted by Spartan005
Or maybe you're just an *******?

Nah

Originally posted by Spartan005
Or maybe you're just an *******?

how relevant, thank you.

Originally posted by Schecter
how relevant, thank you.

You're welcome 🙂

oh its my pleasure entirely, as is the case with everyone else, im sure.

in fact i think it was around page 12 that we were all discussing just how we should think/feel/discuss all this, and what basic thought patterns we should follow...yet you never showed up to tell us, so really we just spent the last 25 or so pages talking about knitting, ping pong, and various other hobbies.