Canada's rich get richer while it's poor get poorer, new study shows.

Started by Fishy24 pages

Originally posted by Starhawk
It's your job to have a solution because you are claiming mine won't work, so then I come to you and ask if you have a better idea.

And what exactly do you thing is wrong about my assesment, don't speak in abstractions. And which points do you think are irrelevent?

I believe we have already given plenty of solutions that will work and have worked in the past.

Besides you are complaining that everything is shit and give a solution, we say that solution doesn't work and it will only make matters worse. That doesn't automatically make it our job to come up with a better solution, perhaps we simply don't care but are trying to be helpful by saying your idea's are stupid.

"assessment," "irrelevant." Oh and "its" is the possessive. "It's" is "it is."

Originally posted by Fishy
I believe we have already given plenty of solutions that will work and have worked in the past.

Besides you are complaining that everything is shit and give a solution, we say that solution doesn't work and it will only make matters worse. That doesn't automatically make it our job to come up with a better solution, perhaps we simply don't care but are trying to be helpful by saying your idea's are stupid.

Actually it does, I never said my plan was perfect for all sides, but it helps the people who need it most. And thats what matters to me.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Oh and "its" is the possessive. "It's" is "it is."

damn, I get that one wrong all the time

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
"assessment," "irrelevant." Oh and "its" is the possessive. "It's" is "it is."

Like in: "About my assessment, it's irrelevant, as I am lying about being a law student"?

Originally posted by inimalist
damn, I get that one wrong all the time
Canada's rich get richer while it is poor get poorer, new study shows. 313
Originally posted by Bardock42
Like in: "About my assessment, it's irrelevant, as I am lying about being a law student"?
A gold star and a cookie. 😊

Originally posted by Starhawk
Actually it does, I never said my plan was perfect for all sides, but it helps the people who need it most. And thats what matters to me.

"that's"

Cut out the trolling and get back on topic.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Cut out the trolling and get back on topic.

You are overestimating the problem, and you can't spell.

No I am not over estimating the problem. The rich in Canada have gotten rich by 22% while the poor have gotten poorer by 11%. Disabled people don't get enough to live on.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Cut out the trolling and get back on topic.

You're a law student, who makes grammar mistakes of an eleven year old's ability. How very intellectual.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I am not over estimating the problem. The rich in Canada have gotten rich by 22% while the poor have gotten poorer by 11%. Disabled people don't get enough to live on.
If that was true then there wouldn't be any disabled anymore since you first started that topic.

Originally posted by Bardock42
If that was true then there wouldn't be any disabled anymore since you first started that topic.

What kind of logic is that?

And it is true.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I am not over estimating the problem. The rich in Canada have gotten rich by 22% while the poor have gotten poorer by 11%. Disabled people don't get enough to live on.

I can't believe you think this is exclusive to Canada. As I'm sure I, and many others have already said; it's capitalism, it's happening in every industrialised country. In countries that aren't industrialised it's worse, if they're born poor they stay poor.

Originally posted by Starhawk
What kind of logic is that?

And it is true.

And once again how would you handle that? By making it even worse for company's to stay in Canada? That's stupid, the company's will only want to stay if they make money in Canada. The way to do is that is through reducing taxes or creating tax loopholes. You give company's that invest in Canada reduced taxes. This helps, your way will scare them away.

Originally posted by Starhawk
What kind of logic is that?

And it is true.

Because if they don't make enough to live...they'll die, correct?

Still as relevant as ever and, oh so, mesmerizing.. Communist Megaman march!

Originally posted by xmarksthespot

And what about the people who lose their jobs when these companies downsize? And while they may stay in your country for the benefits , they will ALWAYS outsource. And hard working people are left out in the cold with nothing.

What about the disabled population? What are they supposed to do while you are giving the money for their social programs to big business? As I said Canada's economy has been great for the last decade, we eliminated the federal deficit, and yet wages for the low tax brackets have gone down, social programs have been cut again and again.

And the disabled have to live off charity and got ot the food bank and live in missions. None of which they should have to do.

Originally posted by Starhawk
And what about the people who lose their jobs when these companies downsize? And while they may stay in your country for the benefits , they will ALWAYS outsource. And hard working people are left out in the cold with nothing.

What about the disabled population? What are they supposed to do while you are giving the money for their social programs to big business? As I said Canada's economy has been great for the last decade, we eliminated the federal deficit, and yet wages for the low tax brackets have gone down, social programs have been cut again and again.

And the disabled have to live off charity and got ot the food bank and live in missions. None of which they should have to do.

And if you tax them more you think they will not downsize?