AOTC Mace vs AOTC Dooku

Started by Time-Immemorial17 pages

Where are you getting this boost from? And what makes you think Yoda could take Windu? Yoda might have higher midi's but Windu is the best swordsman there is.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Where are you getting this boost from? And what makes you think Yoda could take Windu? Yoda might have higher midi's but Windu is the best swordsman there is.

ROTS novelization and then it's also in some EU material. Yoda is the greatest Jedi up to this point. It's pretty much easy to realize Yoda would take Windu. If he can match Sidious on his own merit with no such boost, while Windu needs one to contend, it's obvious Yoda would be better.

He didn't beat Sidious, Windu did..boost or not..Yoda lacks the reach to win a decisive saber victory imo.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He didn't beat Sidious, Windu did..boost or not..Yoda lacks the reach to win a decisive saber victory imo.

Well in the novelization Yoda also did disarm Sidious, and in the movie as well as proven by the script, so... I retain the argument Yoda is better since he could disarm Sidious without the need of a boost. Yod's size in an advantage as well. It makes him a harder target to hit and a ball of speed.

I didnt see anything from him in the movies that puts him above Maul.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I didnt see anything from him in the movies that puts him above Maul.

All maul did was beat Qui Gon Jin who just going by the movies had no feats. Dooku beat the better Kenobi with ease with his saber while Maul didn't, defeated Anakin, held his own against Yoda and lived, then in ROTS held his own agisnst the better version of both Anakin and Obi wan at the same time, and defeated Obi wan without Dun Moch, and was able to hold his own agaisnt Anakin's strength which his form is weak against.

So yea that's plenty to put Dooku above Maul.

If you mean Yoda then all you need is his battle with Sidious and compare the two. Yoda disarmed Sidious while Maul didn't enough said.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I didnt see anything from him in the movies that puts him above Maul.

I suggest you watch the movies again.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I suggest you watch the movies again.

I mean Mace, not maul.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I mean Mace, not maul.

That's different then.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
All maul did was beat Qui Gon Jin who just going by the movies had no feats. Dooku beat the better Kenobi with ease with his saber while Maul didn't, defeated Anakin, held his own against Yoda and lived, then in ROTS held his own agisnst the better version of both Anakin and Obi wan at the same time, and defeated Obi wan without Dun Moch, and was able to hold his own agaisnt Anakin's strength which his form is weak against.

So yea that's plenty to put Dooku above Maul.

If you mean Yoda then all you need is his battle with Sidious and compare the two. Yoda disarmed Sidious while Maul didn't enough said.

I meant Mace...

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Cause Windu won't receive the same boost he did in that fight. The dark energy coming from Dooku isn't nearly as much as Sidious, and the hatred mace has, is mutually not as large. Dooku is also more controlled and calculating then Sidious who wouldn't let his emotions get the better of him like that.
He didn't get an amp from Talzin yet took her on by himself. Dooku isn't as skilled as Sidious either. Windu didn't need an amp for Jango Fett. An amp is outside outside ones own abilities. You aren't defining it correctly.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Windu is better then Dooku, everyone in the other forum has told you this and proven it over and over. Dooku literally gets curb stomped by Windu faster and easier then Anakin did to him .
👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
He didn't get an amp from Talzin yet took her on by himself. Dooku isn't as skilled as Sidious either. Windu didn't need an amp for Jango Fett. An amp is outside outside ones own abilities. You aren't defining it correctly.

and want feats suggest Talzin was a great deulist in the first place? She was really just swinging and he was blocking. Jango Fett would be crushed by Dooku. Really you beinging Jango Fett is irrelevant. Dooku didn't need a boost to last as long as he did agisnst Yoda, defeat Anakin and Obi wan, Vos and Ventress, and savage, Sora Bulq and tholme, and the master he killed in SOD, or to defeat all the night brother in SOD comic.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Where are you getting this boost from? And what makes you think Yoda could take Windu? Yoda might have higher midi's but Windu is the best swordsman there is.

Top kek. Windu is stated repeatedly to be 'second only to Yoda'. Let me simplify that. 'Mace is weaker than Yoda'. Only in pure canon can you even debate that Windu is a better swordsman.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
and want feats suggest Talzin was a great deulist in the first place? She was really just swinging and he was blocking. Jango Fett would be crushed by Dooku. Really you beinging Jango Fett is irrelevant. Dooku didn't need a boost to last as long as he did agisnst Yoda, defeat Anakin and Obi wan, Vos and Ventress, and savage, Sora Bulq and tholme, and the master he killed in SOD, or to defeat all the night brother in SOD comic.
Well, he beat Sidious but not her. Sidious also didn't best her in his own.

Based on ?

Dooku fled and Sidious bested Yoda. Also abc logic.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
Top kek. Windu is stated repeatedly to be 'second only to Yoda'. Let me simplify that. 'Mace is weaker than Yoda'. Only in pure canon can you even debate that Windu is a better swordsman.

I am debating in pure canon, Windu is a middle aged male in his prime while yoda is 800 years old.

Windu is fast enough to keep up with palps, him and palps were moving so fast Ani could not even seen them iirrc.

Windu has the speed, the age and the height, reach advantage, all of which matter in a sword fight.

Windu took down Sidious with easy, while Yoda could not get the job done.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I am debating in pure canon, Windu is a middle aged male in his prime while yoda is 800 years old.

Windu is fast enough to keep up with palps, him and palps were moving so fast Ani could not even seen them iirrc.

Windu has the speed, the age and the height, reach advantage, all of which matter in a sword fight.

Windu took down Sidious with easy, while Yoda could not get the job done.

Canon is all that matters.

👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well, he beat Sidious but not her. Sidious also didn't best her in his own.

Based on ?

Dooku fled and Sidious bested Yoda. Also abc logic.

Again with what? Say it with me, a large boost.

To Dooku crushing Fett? Windu won and Obi stood his own, and Dooku is solidly above Obi and is on level with Windu so.

Dooku contended none the less without a boost. Sidious didn't best Yoda. He got lucky.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Again with what? Say it with me, a large boost.

To Dooku crushing Fett? Windu won and Obi stood his own, and Dooku is solidly above Obi and is on level with Windu so.

Dooku contended none the less without a boost. Sidious didn't best Yoda. He got lucky.

That was done infer his own abilities.

Abc logic. Dooku is also slower.

Dooku fled while Windu bested the guy who bested Yoda.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Again with what? Say it with me, a large boost.

To Dooku crushing Fett? Windu won and Obi stood his own, and Dooku is solidly above Obi and is on level with Windu so.

Dooku contended none the less without a boost. Sidious didn't best Yoda. He got lucky.

This isn't DBZ, there was no power up displayed over 9000.