Originally posted by Gideon
There would be no "no point" in that argument if your assessment of Dooku's lightsaber skills in comparison to Palpatine's own was correct. That has yet to be proven. In fact, I'd like to see it proven.Count Dooku wasn't able to defeat or outduel a distracted, emotionally conflicted Yoda on a planet [B]steeped
in the dark side of the Force, where his powers would be at their apex, and Yoda's would likely be stifled....And you're saying that Darth "I-Haven't-Dueled-In-Thirteen-Years-And-Managed-To-Pwn-Three-Of-The-Order's-Finest-In-Seconds" Sidious is weaker than that?
In fact, let's analyze that scenario: Palpatine was outnumbered, four to one. All four of his opponents were heralded as among the finest in the Order's history and boasted a lifetime of rigorous training and sparring coupled with three years of active war duty.
What about Palpatine? He... ah... plotted and manipulated for thirteen years, had his lightsaber buried in a statue, and admittedly did not spar with Dooku [LoE].
Yet he pwned three of 'em in less than half a minute whilst going blade-to-blade with Windu himself, and then forcing Mace on the defensive.
Now, analyze the other situation: He was confronted by Yoda in his office and gave him one hell of a duel with a lightsaber. This isn't a half-distracted or emotionally torn Yoda, either. It's a Yoda who is hellbent on skull****ing Sidious and pissing on his robed, dead corpse.
If Dooku > Sidious in swordsmanship, that would imply that Yoda is quite a ways above Sidious in swordsmanship (which wasn't the case) and would also mean that Yoda is superior to Sidious instead of his equal (which you've preached prior).
...Yet, as we've seen, Yoda isn't superior to Sidious. He's equal. Which means that Sidious > Dooku. [/B]