Darkseid vs Anti Monitor(pre AM Universe absorption)

Started by darthgoober6 pages

Darkseid vs Anti Monitor(pre AM Universe absorption)

Current DS

vs

Anti Monitor BEFORE he absorbed the life energies from the Anti Matter Universes.

Who takes it?

am

Re: Darkseid vs Anti Monitor(pre AM Universe absorption)

Originally posted by darthgoober
Current DS

vs

Anti Monitor BEFORE he absorbed the life energies from the Anti Matter Universes.

Who takes it?


nice thread, but i dont think current DS would give PC superman a fight imo..
AM ftw.

darkseid gets curbstomped. he is screaming for luthor as he dies.

Originally posted by Priest
nice thread, but i dont think current DS would give PC superman a fight imo..
AM ftw.

Supes was pretty heavily weakened when AM took him down, and Supergirl damn near took AM out afterwards, so it's a stretch to base it off that fight. I'm not claiming that DS wins here, just pointing that out.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Supes was pretty heavily weakened when AM took him down, and Supergirl damn near took AM out afterwards, so it's a stretch to base it off that fight. I'm not claiming that DS wins here, just pointing that out.
i feel while am is highly overrated in this forum that darkseid still gets curbstomped here.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Supes was pretty heavily weakened when AM took him down, and Supergirl damn near took AM out afterwards, so it's a stretch to base it off that fight. I'm not claiming that DS wins here, just pointing that out.
\oh shit, i was thinking of the AM after he fought Spectre, probably at his most weakened state..
Im gonna have to come back and do some research..

Originally posted by Priest
\oh shit, i was thinking of the AM after he fought Spectre, probably at his most weakened state..
Im gonna have to come back and do some research..

Yeah this is AM BEFORE all that went down.

Originally posted by quanchi112
i feel while am is highly overrated in this forum that darkseid still gets curbstomped here.

Again I'm not saying that AM wins, but he doesn't have anywhere NEAR the feats to suggest it would be a curbstomp IMO.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Again I'm not saying that AM wins, but he doesn't have anywhere NEAR the feats to suggest it would be a curbstomp IMO.

superpoke You and I aren't reading the same story apparently. Darkseid knew that if AM found Apokolips, he was screwed. Which is why he set up the cloaking field and cut off the 4th world in the first place.

AM smokes Darkseid. Universe destroying power ftw.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Again I'm not saying that AM wins, but he doesn't have anywhere NEAR the feats to suggest it would be a curbstomp IMO.
I actually disagree with you on that one Dg....the Am maybe able to curbstomp Ds. I'm just going to wait for one of our Dc experts, to come along.

Originally posted by starking
I actually disagree with you on that one Dg....the Am maybe able to curbstomp Ds. I'm just going to wait for one of our Dc experts, to come along.
whose a dc expert in here?

Originally posted by quanchi112
whose a dc expert in here?

Meherb

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
superpoke You and I aren't reading the same story apparently. Darkseid knew that if AM found Apokolips, he was screwed. Which is why he set up the cloaking field and cut off the 4th world in the first place.

AM smokes Darkseid. Universe destroying power ftw.


DS's current incarnation is being portrayed as being a bit more powerful than it was Pre Crisis(given the reality manipulation, creating pocket dimensions, etc.) so it's a bit of a stretch to base a winner off DS back in the day.

And it was never firmly established that he destroyed a universe without tech(and specifically mentioned that the anti matter wave that destroyed the Positive Matter Universe's WAS the result of tech). So the claim that he's a universal destroyer based off of his POSSIBLY destroying Pariah's universe(off-panel) when there's no further evidence to support it(and plenty to contradict it) is very similar to bringing up Sentry stalemating Galactus as evidence of him being more powerful than Darkseid.

Originally posted by darthgoober
DS's current incarnation is being portrayed as being a bit more powerful than it was Pre Crisis(given the reality manipulation, creating pocket dimensions, etc.) so it's a bit of a stretch to base a winner off DS back in the day.

And it was never firmly established that he destroyed a universe without tech(and specifically mentioned that the anti matter wave that destroyed the Positive Matter Universe's WAS the result of tech). So the claim that he's a universal destroyer based off of his POSSIBLY destroying Pariah's universe(off-panel) when there's no further evidence to support it(and plenty to contradict it) is very similar to bringing up Sentry stalemating Galactus as evidence of him being more powerful than Darkseid.

ur a tricky one arent you.

The stairs win.

Originally posted by quanchi112
ur a tricky one arent you.

Not tricky, just fair. If unsubstantiated off panel evidence that's contradicted by on panel evidence isn't viable evidence for one character then it shouldn't be viable evidence for any character.

Originally posted by Nikkolas
The stairs win.
i almost forgot about darkseid falling down the steps. it utterly makes him look ridicuolus even with the explanation.

Originally posted by Nikkolas
The stairs win.

now that would of been funy if this was a month ago...

Originally posted by darthgoober
Not tricky, just fair. If unsubstantiated off panel evidence that's contradicted by on panel evidence isn't viable evidence for one character then it shouldn't be viable evidence for any character.
oh i agree with what ur saying.