Originally posted by carver9
But you're clinging to a statement as well. "It was ordered for Cap to go all out" which is a statement. Why accept one without accepting the other?
Originally posted by abhilegendNo, you are picking and choosing. Both statements count. When you pick and choose it makes it obvious you have an agenda. No one is buying it.
Because it wasn't contradicted anywhere in the comic. Cap having an advantage was where he couldn't KO a weakened and drained Superman with a cheapshot but Superman knocked him out.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Because it wasn't contradicted anywhere in the comic. Cap having an advantage was where he couldn't KO a weakened and drained Superman with a cheapshot but Superman knocked him out.
But Superman admitting that he couldnt beat Cap in a fist fight and actually doing something to prevent him from facing Cap face to face (switching partners with Batman) is contradicting? No. If youre going to accept one statement, accept ALL, especially if the statements take place in the same comic. We don't pick and choose ABHI.
Originally posted by carver9
But Superman admitting that he couldnt beat Cap in a fist fight and actually doing something to prevent him from facing Cap face to face (switching partners with Batman) is contradicting? No. If youre going to accept one statement, accept ALL, especially if the statements take place in the same comic. We don't pick and choose ABHI.
http://i.imgur.com/olGxpZo.jpg
Learn to read.
I'm accepting both statements, Cap was stated to have "an" advantage. He wasn't strong enough to knock superman out even with Superman being weakened and drained after cheapshotting him while going ALL OUT, Superman however KTFO him with a cheapshot. Superman while weakened>>Captain Marvel.
🙂
Originally posted by carver9
But Superman admitting that he couldnt beat Cap in a fist fight and actually doing something to prevent him from facing Cap face to face (switching partners with Batman) is contradicting? No. If youre going to accept one statement, accept ALL, especially if the statements take place in the same comic. We don't pick and choose ABHI.
I get what you're trying to say, but that's some horrible logic right there.
Plus, being wrong in parts doesn't help either.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you are picking and choosing. Both statements count. When you pick and choose it makes it obvious you have an agenda. No one is buying it.
Shut up. You're worse than most of the people on this forum, and you're barely allowed on this forum as it is. Stirring up trouble is only going to see you get banned sooner rather than later.
Originally posted by -Pr-What feats/statements have I ignored ? I am one of the only people on here who doesn't excuse any showings.
I get what you're trying to say, but that's some horrible logic right there.Plus, being wrong in parts doesn't help either.
Shut up. You're worse than most of the people on this forum, and you're barely allowed on this forum as it is. Stirring up trouble is only going to see you get banned sooner rather than later.
Have you ever heard me use the word pis ever ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit flip flopping.
I did questioned the feat before any of you did, the difference is that I'm mature enough to allow his reply which seems within reason. It's called debating without an agenda, learn to do it my friend.
That was quite a mediocre showing for Billy, considering the stuff he has done 🙁
Originally posted by BentleyI try to actively debate with him. I see it differently. I have also seen Marvel ko him easily with Cheapshots and with Superman at full power.
I did questioned the feat before any of you did, the difference is that I'm mature enough to allow his reply which seems within reason. It's called debating without an agenda, learn to do it my friend.That was quite a mediocre showing for Billy, considering the stuff he has done 🙁
I am basing my reasoning on this one fight, nope. The two have a rich history of being close to equal in terms of strength and power. I feel basing their entire history on the one interaction of an Eclipso possession square off is spinning things. Do you disagree with my wisdom in that assessment ?
