EmperorSidious2
Master of Magic
Originally posted by Silent Master
Acknowledging that Yoda has feats of mutli-ton level tk and speed and thus can use them in a fight isn't an example of bias, it's an example of not ignoring Yoda's feats(like you're trying to do).Fact is that based on feats, Yoda wins.
Yes I have acknowledged yodas feat even making a list of feats that I can recall I know I missed some for sure but, I'm still sticking with a dumbledore win due to versatility and I still don't understand why this would be based on feats from the movies when the books is the main source for Harry Potter but still even if we just use movie dumbledore he still has a good amount of spells that he would use to win
1. Firestorm
2. Water spell
3. Protego
4. Expelliarmius
5. Can really manipulate fire in any way shape or form
6. Turn objects into sand
7. Apparition
He could win with those but he still has all his spells which make him even more versatile and dangerous. So you say based on feats? Vs battles are based on more than just feats. Considering the fact that the story Harry Potter is centered around Harry it wouldn't show dumbledore as much. However the prequels as centerd as they are around anakin it gives more room for different characters to get into play and also since you say no low showing does that mean that dumbledores reflexes are faster? I'm not saying superhuman fast but fast to like he can do what voldemort did in part 2 against Harry. And also with low ball showing does that also mean he can use unforgivable curses? Since he can but chooses not to? But still he still has plenty of other spells to use. You BELEIVE that right?